Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.49UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.83LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.65LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.77LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.59LIKELY
Extraversion
0.21UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.79LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.5UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
He lives on the edge of my mind - a friend and former colleague who hurt me deeply.
He makes his home several hundred miles away, but every so often he walks through the borders of my memory.
I have to choose again to forgive him.
He lives on the edge of my mind - a friend and former colleague who hurt me deeply.
He makes his home several hundred miles away, but every so often he walks through the borders of my memory.
I have to choose again to forgive him.
While I h ave refused to live in the bondage of bitterness, toward this man, the relationship has never been reconciled.
If I saw him on the street, I would not run up and put my arms around him.
Some issues would have to be dealt with first.
Question for Personal Reflection:
Do you have an unresolved relationship in your past or present?
What feelings surface when you think about that person?
If I’m not careful, I can start feeling angry and even bitter.
I have to prayerfully guard myself against this and ask for God to give me grace to continue to not only forgive, but love that person.
Jesus took the matters of forgiveness and reconciliation very seriously.
He was concerned enough to give us detailed instructions about how to confront people who wound us - and what to do if they refuse to admit they’re wrong.
This section of Jesus’ teaching directly precedes the parable we read in Study 5.
Jesus took the matters of forgiveness and reconciliation very seriously.
He was concerned enough to give us detailed instructions about how to confront people who wound us - and what to do if the refuse to admit they’re wrong.
This section of Jesus’ teaching directly precedes the parable we read in Study 5.
Read
Question 1
a.
Construct a simple flow chart of the steps and the possible responses outlined by Jesus in these verses.
Step 1: Tell the person who sinned against you that they sinned against you… one on one.
Step 2: If he does not listen to you, take one or two others with you so that you have witnesses with you when you confront him again.
Step 3: If he still does not listen to you, bring it up to the church.
Step 4: If even here he does not listen to you and repent, he is to be regarded as an unbeliever.
b.
What would it feel like to walk through this process as the one who was sinned against.
b.
What would it feel like to walk through this process as the one who was sinned against.
It would be uncomfortable to bring this up with someone.
It would be easier, though not helpful or biblical, to sweep it under the rug and just be mad about it behind the person’s back.
I say that as a joke, but also what far too many folks do.
c. as the one who was sinning?
c. as the one who was sinning?
I would probably run through the emotions of being defensive and being ashamed.
It would upset me to be confronted like this, but I also know this is the proper way to handle it.
And, I would much more respect the person who approached me one on one than the person who went around telling everyone else how mad they were at me for whatever I had done… or been accused of doing.
Question 2
Question 2
This process begins, “If your brother sins against you” (v.
15).
Jesus’ words apply directly to problems between “brothers” (Christians).
What principles from these verses might help us resolve conflicts with non-Christians?
Approaching someone, one on one, still shows respect for that person.
Even bringing one or two others with you shows respect rather than airing out all of your dirty laundry to everyone else.
Also, not holding everything in is also very healthy.
You are much more likely going to win that person (if they are an honest person) than if you went straight to everyone else.
Question 3
Why does Jesus place the burden of resolving the conflict on the offended person rather than on the offender?
First of all, God was the offended party and approached us first to bring about reconciliation.
Second, the offender may not even know they have offended.
Third, we are to be agents of reconciliation and seek healing these relationships rather than letting our own sinful feelings about being wronged fester within us and get worse.
Question 4
What attitude do you think you should exhibit when you confront the person who has wounded you?
Love and humility.
I don’t think you should approach that person wagging your finger from your high horse.
Instead, lovingly share with that person what they did and how it made you feel.
Often that person will have no idea about either and would want the opportunity to apologize.
We should always be aware that we also have offended others, and especially God, and have been grateful for when those times have been handled lovingly.
And, it’s much more likely to bring forth reconciliation than if we approached the person in great anger and righteous indignation.
Question 5
What are the benefits of taking two or three people with you the second time?
To verify that you did in fact lovingly approach the offender.
To also verify how that person responded.
It would be easy for that person to deny you approached them or even lie about what was said, when you approach them alone the first time.
This helps keep the record straight and true.
Question 6
What will (hopefully) be accomplished by taking the extreme measures of verse 17?
The whole point of church discipline is restoration of a sinning brother or sister and the reconciliation of that relationship… whether it’s the relationship of two people or back with the church.
Excommunication is a last resort.
The goal is not primarily punitive.
But in our very litigious society, church discipline almost never happens.
We are afraid to confront people and terrified of how they will respond.
But these words are from Jesus, so we need to come to a place where we understand them and practice them.
Question 7
What authority does Jesus give to his followers and the church to act in such a way toward the person who refuses to repent (v.
18)
He gives us his authority to carry out church discipline in his way.
It must be lovingly and humbly carried out and not in an authoritarian manner.
Question 8
What promises does Jesus make to those who are faithful in the areas of resolving conflict and pursuing reconciliation (vv.
19-20)?
That when two or three are gathered in his name for such a purpose, he promises to be with them in their midst.
In other words, even in the midst of something so difficult, the two or three will not be going through it alone, but the Lord Jesus will also be there as well.
What a great encouragement.
Question 9
a.
What should you do if the offender never admits wrong?
In the context of a Christian brother or sister who attends your church, you should carry out the steps listed above.
If the Christian goes to another church, you need to modify it.
And if the person is an unbeliever, they are living as you would expect.
Still work through some of the steps, especially if there is a relationship involved.
But be loving and humble toward them in hopes that you can win them to Christ as well as restore the relationship.
b.
How do you think God views that person?
God sent his Son to die for that person.
He cares about how this situation is handled.
He wants them to repent.
Their very soul is at stake.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9