Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.05UNLIKELY
Fear
0.67LIKELY
Joy
0.63LIKELY
Sadness
0.59LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.38UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.72LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.71LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.63LIKELY
Extraversion
0.3UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.75LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.47UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Lord, grant me the grace to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change those things that I can, and the wisdom to know the difference
Wilberforce
MP
dedicated his life to abolishing slavery
Undoubtedly influenced by Paul in Galatians 3:28
And yet, today’s passage, written in Paul’s own hand, was used by his opponents who argued that slavery was accepted by Paul, so it must be OK.
What gives?
Paul vs. Wilberforce
Wilberforce wealthy, influential, close friends with the prime minister.
Was in a position to change the way of the world, and set out to do so.
Paul couldn’t have been in a more different situation - old man, prisoner, hoping for freedom, but on his way to the executioners block.
Not in a position to change the world.
But he could change life for one person.
Onesimus was in a no win situation.
If caught, fugitives could be punished by being whipped, burnt with iron, or killed.
Those who lived were branded on the forehead with the letters FUG, for fugitivus.
Sometimes slaves had a metal collar riveted around the neck.
Paul recognises that he is not hte moral authority in society, but he feels strongly about how human beings, how followers of Christ should treat one another.
With love.
With love.
Paul treats Philemon with love and respect.
Paul displays his love and respect for Onesimus.
He leans hard on Philemon to do the same.
What can we learn from this?
Sometimes we can’t change the world, but we can always change our attitude to vulnerable people
You can’t always legislate to make bad things go away.
We’re particularly guilty of this in the PCANZ.
If there’s soemthing we disagree with, we force a resolution through GA.
It doesn’t help.
It doesn’t extend the kind of radical love that Paul calls us to.
What if we replaced slave with another word in this verse?
Woman.
Liberal.
Conservative.
LGBTQI.
Tangata Whenua.
Doubtful.
Hopeful.
Broken.
Seeker.
hurting.
Vulnerable.
Lost.
You.
Me.
All of us.
It’s not actually that hard.
Lead with love.
Make that our starting point.
Everything else will fall into line - not because we make it so, but because we will be living in harmony with God’s will for our lives, and in harm,ony with God’s will for the world.
This is the law of love.
It’s not about what is right, or what is wrong.
It’s not about enforcing our will on others.
It’s about recognising the things that we are not in a position to change in the world we share, and choosing to respond with love.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9