0951

Exploring Biblical Characters   •  Sermon  •  Submitted
0 ratings
· 2 views
Notes
Transcript
Sermon Tone Analysis
A
D
F
J
S
Emotion
A
C
T
Language
O
C
E
A
E
Social
View more →

Boaz is not Elimelech’s brother nor is Ruth Elimelech’s widow. Instead, the duty falls to Boaz because he is Elimelech’s close relative, i.e., a “kinsman-redeemer” (Heb. gōʾēl; 2:20). By a kind of “legal fiction,” Ruth substitutes for Naomi as Elimelech’s widow. Hence, we prefer to describe the practice in Ruth as “levirate-like” or even as a “kinsman-marriage.”
Clearly, the closer the relationship to the deceased, the greater was the kinsman’s duty to carry out the custom. One may, thus, hypothesize that the kinsman duty followed an order of obligation similar to those for inheritance (Num. 27:8–11) and enslaved relatives (Lev. 25:47–55), i.e., brother, paternal uncle, paternal uncle’s son, and “the member of his clan who is most nearly related” (Num. 27:11).
Old Testament Survey: The Message, Form, and Background of the Old Testament Social Features
Behind it stands an ancient Israelite custom: ownership of ancestral land always had to remain in the family. A family might mortgage it to fend off poverty. But the law required the nearest next of kin to buy it back into family ownership (cf. Lev. 25:25ff.). In this case, the other relative agreed to buy Elimelech’s property from Naomi (4:4).

Boaz cleverly obtains the right, marries Ruth, p 521 and the two have a son. The book celebrates him as a “son … born to Naomi” (4:17a) for the child Obed preserves her family line. More important, he turns out to be the grandfather of David.

From Latin levir “brother-in-law,” thus “marriage with the brother-in-law.” For excellent summaries of the main arguments and problems, see H. H. Rowley, “The Marriage of Ruth,” pp. 169–194 in The Servant of the Lord and Other Essays on the Old Testament, 2nd ed. (Oxford: 1965); also T. and D. Thompson, “Some Legal Problems in the Book of Ruth,” VT 18 (1968): 79–99.

For example, in ch. 2, a “flashback” gives facts withheld earlier (v. 7). Similarly, the narrator withholds mention of Elimelech’s field until late in the story—to the surprise of readers (4:3).

Something else is striking in the book: the author likes to identify Ruth as “the Moabite

Further, the book promotes the practice of Israel’s covenant ideal, the lifestyle of ḥesed or “loyalty.” In essence, to do ḥesed is voluntarily to “go beyond the call of duty.”17 Ruth’s stunning statement of love and devotion puts that lifestyle into words: “Where you go, I will go; where you lodge, I will lodge; your people shall be my people, and your God my God” (1:16)

Finally, the book teaches the divine providence which brought forth David (4:17b). The closing genealogy (4:18–22) sets the story of these ordinary folks from Bethlehem in a larger context. It shows the direct link between their lives and God’s work in Israel as a nation. The son born to Naomi is more than just God’s gift to continue her family line. He also begins the history of God’s rule through the dynasty of David.18 In this way the book ties in to the Bible’s main theme of redemptive history. Thus, directed by God’s hidden guidance, the faithfulness of Ruth, Naomi, and Boaz achieved more than they knew. From their family stemmed the great David and, many generations later, great David’s greater Son.

Related Media
See more
Related Sermons
See more