Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.56LIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.6LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.64LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.49UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.84LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.41UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.25UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.34UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.6LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Future Church: That's Not Right
2 Timothy 3:16-17 • 2 John 7-9
Last week we began the series “Future Church” by talking about Scripture’s use as a teaching tool.
If you need a takeaway from that message, I would say that we would all confess we don’t know everything, and the two known ways to deal with our own ignorance is to:
learn and study to diminish your ignorance
be okay with being ignorant
If you aren’t studying Scripture in some form, you’re saying you don’t care about your ignorance whether that’s intentional or accidental.
This week, we move forward in Paul’s letter to Timothy, and we’ll talk about Rebuke and Correction.
Let me begin with an example:
How do you pronounce this word?
(nuclear)
Since the end of World War II, this has been a MAJOR issue in the world (including current events between Russia and Ukraine).
Why is it that so many people can’t say this word correctly?
Nu-cu-lar
“nu-cu-lar” is wrong!
It’s not mostly right.
It’s not partially right.
It’s not close enough for horseshoes.
It’s wrong.
But I don’t want to leave you just knowing that it’s wrong.
I want to show you an easy way to say it right like the TV show The Electric Company would have shown me when I was a kid:
New-Clear
Let’s replace that wrong pronunciation with the correct pronunciation, “new - clear”
Rebuke and Correction
Telling you “nu-cu-lar” is wrong is rebuke or reproof.
Telling you the correct pronunciation is “new-clear” is correction.
Just telling people they’re wrong is not sufficient.
So the Scripture doesn’t do that!
When we discover we’re wrong about something, especially if it’s something important … we should throw out the bad information.
But that leaves a void.
And a void can be very dangerous!
Jesus said in Matthew 12 (one slide) --
Leaving a void can be very dangerous!
Future Church: That's Not Right
The public face of the Church has grown more and more negative in recent years.
The national media prefer irate presenters, so Christians tend to come across as angry and judgmental on TV because that’s who is given airtime.
Whether that’s a true picture of Christianity or not is irrelevant.
That’s what people see, so we have to try to counter that image any time we have the opportunity.
I can hold fast to my position without being rigid and miserable.
I can believe the Truth of Scripture without figuratively hitting people over the head … and that’s what we must do!
We have to HELP others to the truth, because no one in the history of humanity has EVER been BASHED into the truth.
NEVER.
IN HISTORY.
EVER!
Scripture is useful to take beliefs that are askew (whether greatly or slightly), rebuke them as wrong and replace the void left with a correct belief.
For example … Believing that Jesus is just a good teacher is simply wrong!
But just knowing that it’s wrong doesn’t really fix the problem.
That incorrect information must be replaced with the correct information: Jesus Christ is the son of the Living God … he is Yahweh’s Messiah, and salvation comes through no other name!
And this type of rebuke and correction is needed INSIDE the church community more than outside it.
Outsiders don’t care what Scripture says.
[But, Pastor Chris] … They don’t!
But if my beliefs or actions aren’t aligned with Scripture, I care!
In fact I HOPE someone points it out if my beliefs and actions are out of alignment with the Bible.
Later in this same letter to Timothy, Paul writes:
…so rebuking … with great patience and instruction is expected … of ALL OF US!
Future Church: That's Not Right
How we do that is so very important!
According to one source:
When a disciple’s rebuke is necessary, it must occur in a loving and caring environment.
Some folk will perceive a rebuke as an unloving act.
They will say that to rebuke a disciple is judging and pressuring that disciple.
But their idea of love is according to human sentiment rather than God’s word.
Anything done according to God’s word is an act of love.
---simplybible.com
(an Australian church page intended to teach and spread basic Christianity)
Future Church: That's Not Right
Let me shift gears for just a minute ...
How many times have you heard someone referred to as, or accused of being “The AntiChrist”?
Friends, our understanding of “the antichrist” is flawed.
The truth is, there are MANY antichrists according to the Apostle John, and he’s the one who coined the term.
one slide
While John does use the singular article “the”, his sentiment is not that antichrist is an individual.
He tells us MANY deceivers … don’t acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh … and that idea, that belief, that worldview, that person is antichristian.
Some English translations even use the article “AN Antichrist” because John appears to be correcting an wrong belief rather than identifying one individual.
NIV, CEB and NRSV all translate “this” as “Any such person...”.
New Living Translation renders it “Such a person...”
So a more literal translation of the Greek would be ‘this person who is a deceiver and does not acknowledge Jesus as coming in the flesh is the/an antichrist.’
The idea of a singular antichrist is often attributed to Revelation, but you know what … John wrote Revelation … he’s the only biblical writer who used the term “Antichrist” … and the word never appears in Revelation!
Beasts, Demons, Dragons, Sea monsters, Land monsters, False Prophet, Satan … all make appearances in Revelation, but John doesn’t use the term as a title anywhere in his apocalypse.
John also wrote in 1 John:
So, antichrist is already in the world!
This may seem like splitting hairs, but I can’t tell you the number of emails I got claiming that Barack Obama was THE ANTICHRIST, and the world was going to end if he was elected President.
If we use John’s term, we also must understand the term based on how he used it.
Antichrist, therefore, is not connected to the end of the world, and there isn’t just one.
If you want a singular antichrist: The ultimate persecutor, the ultimate accuser of the Church would be Satan himself, not a human endowed with such a title!
So Antichrist is more logically a spirit of Satan that is already here and runs rampant!
That’s what rebuke and correction looks like, so let me take a moment to rebuke and correct a belief that needs to change for the sake of Future Church.
Future Church: That's Not Right
Many of the loudest voices claiming Christ on the Internet, radio, and television will loudly lament the Church’s loss of status in our society - fearful that Christianity is being marginalized.
We seem to want to hold onto a bygone era of Historic Church when we were respected and loved by society.
Historic Church is gone.
It is not coming back.
So we must look toward Future Church and lean in.
In fact … I would propose that the Church is not being marginalized!
[repeat with emphasis]
The Church has ALWAYS been marginalized!
Jesus told us, “The world hates me.
They’ll hate you, too.”
What part of that do we not understand?
THE CHURCH ALREADY ARE THE MARGINALIZED!
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9