Faithlife Sermons

Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.47UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.52LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.85LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.16UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.39UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.46UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.39UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.6LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Norman Geisler says, “There is general agreement among Christians on the nature of marriage.
It is between a male and a female and involves sexual rights.
It entails a covenant (vow) before God to be faithful to each other because it is a monogamous relation between one man and one woman.
On the other hand, general agreement on divorce is harder to come by among Christians.”
Today we will focus on 3 views on divorce.
Never a reason
Only one reason
Many reason
Divorce is a very confusion subject for the Christian and the Church and because of that it is quite controversial.
The main reason is because divorce is not God intent or desire.
God hate divorce and it was never His intent that marriage would end in divorce
We know that marriage was meant to be a bond that is lasting until death.
We also know that there is a supernatural element to marriage whereby God in not just a witness but a participant.
Not only does God join things together he also is faithful to keep a marriage together as well.
Thats why it is very important to state that, Christians should only marry other Christian.
Some would supposed this verse and verse like it are forbidding interracial marriages, but it not.
It is prohibiting Jewish people from marrying people from other nation who worship other Gods.
This is the warning that Paul tells the Christian in the New Testament
Do not be bound together or unequally yoked with unbelievers.
Wayne Grudem says this, “In a society familiar with agricultural life, the image of two animals yoked together side by side to pull a plow would have been familiar.
The animals would ordinarily have been equally matched, or nearly so.
'S Essential to the image is the idea that where one ox goes, the other ox has to go as well.
Whatever work one ox is doing, the other has to work at it as well.
In other words, the animals have significant influence over each other's lives, and each one also limits the amount of freedom the other has.”
The next part of our class will be taken directly out of Norman Geisler’s Christian Ethic book.
1.
Never a reason
Mr. Geisler says,
1. Divorce violates God's design for marriage.
As has already been shown, Gods ideal for marriage is a monogamous lifetime commitment (Matt.19:6,
Rom.
7:2).
But divorce violates that covenant.
Hence, divorce is never justified.
2. Divorce breaks a vow made before God.
Marriage is a covenant vow before God (Prov.
2:17; Mal.
2:14) and for a lifetime.
Divorce breaks that vow.
But breaking a sacred vow is wrong.
The Scriptures declare: "It is better not to vow than to vow and not fulfill it" (Eccles.
5:5).
3. Jesus condemned all divorce.
When Jesus was asked about divorce in Mark (10:1-11), he gave no exceptions.
This same position was affirmed by Jesus in Luke 16:18.
The so-called exception clause in the parallel passage in Matthew (19:1-9; cf.
5:32) refers not to divorce for adultery but to an annulment for "fornication" before marriage (v.
9).
This is in accordance with Matthew's Jewish emphasis and the Jewish law about unchastity before marriage being grounds for annulling the marriage.
According to Jewish law, the term "husband" also referred to an engaged man (Deut.
22:13-19; Matt.
1:18-25).
In Luke, furthermore, Jesus gave no exception for divorce but said flatly, "Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery, and the man who marries a divorced woman commits adultery'" (Luke 16:18).
4. The apostle Paul condemned divorce.
Paul exhorted the Corinthians: "I give this command (not I, but the Lord) : A wife must not separate from her husband.
But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband" (1 Cor.
7:10-11).
Even "if a brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her Likewise, "if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is wiling to live with her, she must not divorce him" (7:12-13).
5. Divorce disqualified an elder.
One of the qualifications for an elder was that he must be "the husband of but one wife" (I Tim.
3:2).
According' proponents of the strict view on divorce, this means that he could never have been divorced; otherwise he would have been the husband of more than one wife.
6. Ones fist partner is the true partner.
When the woman of Samaria said to Jesus, "I have no husband, he replied, "You are right when you say you have no husband.
The fact is you had had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband" (John 4:17-18).
This is taken to imply that one's first spouse is the only true one.
7. Divorce violates a sacred typology.
According to Paul, a wife is to her husband what the church is to Christ (Eph.
5:32).
Hence, divorce violates that beautiful typology of the heavenly marriage between Christ and his bride, the church.
That God takes a violation of a sacred type seriously can be witnessed in his punishment of Moses for striking the rock (Christ) twice (Num.
20:9-12).
Geisler says, “In summary, this view argues that there are no grounds for divorce.
The "exception" in Matthew 19:9 refers to premarital intercourse (fornication), not to adultery after marriage.
Since there are no grounds for divorce, then divorce is sin and remarriage of a divorcé (man) or divorcée (woman) is wrong.
There is only one ground for divorce.
Many Christians believe that there is only one justifiable ground for divorce: adultery.
Remarriage of divorced persons is not permitted, since they would be living in sin (Matt.
5:32).
This they base on several considerations.”
2. Only one reason
1. Jesus explicitly stated that adultery is grounds for divorce.
Proponents of this view favor rendering Matthew 19:9 the way the New International Version does: "I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery"(emphasis added.)
They point to several factors in favor of this rendering.
The Greek word used is porneia, which includes illicit sexual relations of married as well as unmarried people (see Acts 15:20; Rom.
1:29).
It is used in parallel with the word "adultery" in this very passage, indicating that they have overlapping usages.
2. Jesus repeated this exception in a parallel passage.
Not only did Jesus state adultery as the one ground for divorce when asked, but he stated the same thing in the Sermon on the Mount, saying, "I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery" (Matt.
5:32, emphasis added).
In view of this repeated exception, it is argued that the other reference (in Mark 10:1-9; Luke 16:18), where no exception is mentioned, must be understood in the light of the clearly stated exception of adultery in Matthew.
3. Paul agreed with Jesus's view on divorce.
Paul affirmed Jesus's position on divorce for adultery at least implicitly, if not explicitly.
He was careful to point to the authority and remembered words of Christ in these matters by phrases like "not I, but the Lord" (1 Cor.
7:10).
Even when he said "I, not the Lord," he was not contradicting Christ but merely noting that though Christ never spoke to that particular issue, Christ through the Spirit later gave revelation to Paul (cf. 1 Cor.
2:13; 7:12, 40; 14:37).
Furthermore, it is argued that Paul acknowledged the legitimacy of divorce: "If the unbeliever leaves, let him do so.
A believing man or woman is not bound [by their marital vows] in such circumstances; God has called us to live in peace"(1 Cor.7:15).
Geisler says, “In summary, according to this view, there is only one biblical ground for divorce: adultery.
Divorced persons cannot remarry; if they do, they are living in an adulterous relation.
Those who marry a divorced person are causing them to sin, since the divorced person is really married to another in God's eyes.”
3.
Many reason
1. Paul approves of divorce for desertion.
When Paul says, "If the unbeliever leaves, let him do so" (1 Cor.
7:15), he is speaking of desertion, not adultery.
There is no reference to adultery in the passage.
It simply states that he or she "leaves."
This is desertion by an unbeliever, and Paul says that in such cases the faithful remaining partner is "not bound" by the marriage vows.
The believer would like to keep the vows but cannot since the partner has left the marriage.
This position that divorce is permissible only for adultery or an unbeliever's desertion is expressed in the Westminster Confession, chapter 24:
Section V-Adultery or fornication committed after a contract, being detected before marriage, giveth just occasion to the innocent party to dissolve that contract (Matt.
1:18-20).
In the case of adultery after marriage, it is lawful for the innocent party to sue out a divorce (Matt.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9