Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.73LIKELY
Sadness
0.15UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.53LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.72LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.58LIKELY
Extraversion
0.41UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.48UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Peter on the roof
*** Image of a 1st Century Israelite House
Peter’s “trial” in Jerusalem
The accusation
Acts 11:3 (NRSV)
“Why did you go to uncircumcised men and eat with them?”
Peter’s defense
He tells the story
Peter has evidence
Peter’s conclusion
[T]he basic defense offered here involves a metastasis, namely, the transference of responsibility for what happened and even for Peter’s own actions to God.
*** Note source: Witherington, B., III.
(1998).
The Acts of the Apostles: a socio-rhetorical commentary (p.
363).
Wm.
B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Did Peter’s explanation satisfy?
Acts 11:3 (NRSV)
“Why did you go to uncircumcised men and eat with them?”
Even Peter wavers
It takes a while
The door is open
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9