Step 4. Interpret the Text in Its Own Historical Setting

Preaching OT Narratives  •  Sermon  •  Submitted
0 ratings
· 6 views
Notes
Transcript

Greidanus’ Steps from OT Text to Christocentric Sermon

Preaching Christ from the Old Testament: A Contemporary Hermeneutical Method Chapter 7: Steps from Old Testament Text to Christocentric Sermon

Select a textual unit with an eye to congregational needs.

2. Read and reread the text in its literary context.

3. Outline the structure of the text.

4. Interpret the text in its own historical setting.

5. Formulate the text’s theme and goal.

6. Understand the message in the contexts of canon and redemptive history.

7. Formulate the sermon theme and goal.

8. Select a suitable sermon form.

9. Prepare the sermon outline.

10. Write the sermon in oral style.

Three elements of Interpretation
Literary interpretation
Historical interpretation
Theological interpretation

Literary Interpretation

Four elements of every story
Plot
Characters
Setting
Point of View
Characters
Protagonist - the main character of the story and the one through whose perspective we follow most of the action
Antagonist - the one who stands against the protagonist, blocking his or her desires
Foil - character who serves as a contrast to other characters, most often the protagonist
“Simply get to know the characters as thoroughly as the details allow you to” (Leland Ryken).
By what they do
By what they say
By what other characters say about them
By what the author says about them
The setting
Physical – geography, atmosphere
Temporal – time period
Cultural – beliefs, attitudes, customs
Atmosphere/mood
Point of view
“The perspective through which we observe and evaluate everything connected with the story…a device used by authors to shape and guide how the reader responds to the characters and events in the story” (Ryken & Longman).
“An implied invisible presence in every scene…displays full omniscience…narrates the story from one overarching ideological point of view” (Rhoads & Michie).

the lack of character evaluation exhibits the narrator’s purposeful attempt not to close off the narrative at the human level but to keep the narrative open to God: What is the covenant God doing in and through and in spite of these human characters? Thus the narrator not only narrates from God’s point of view but manages to turn our attention to God even when the narrative is about human characters.

Literary features/narrative style
Repetition
Omission
Dialogue
Inclusion
Chiasm
Irony
Proportional spacing
Crucial/decisive events

Literary interpretation of Genesis 22

[Setting: Note time period, places, beliefs, customs, attitudes; atmosphere/mood]
Land of Moriah (v. 2) - place of sacrifice.
Three days (v. 4) - why Mt. Moriah? Why a long journey?
Burnt offering, child sacrifice? (forbidden in the law)
altar, Isaac laid on the altar (suspense, will Abraham actually kill his son?)
[Characters: How each is introduced; who is the protagonist, antagonist, foil; are characters or actions positive or negative?]
Preaching Christ from the Old Testament: A Contemporary Hermeneutical Method (Literary Interpretation)
Scene 1: God and Abraham (vv 1–2)Scene 2: Abraham and his servants (vv 3–5)Scene 3: Abraham and Isaac (vv 6–8)Scene 4: Abraham and Isaac (vv 9–10)Scene 5: The angel of the Lord and Abraham (vv 11–14)Scene 6: The angel of the Lord and Abraham (vv 15–18)Scene 7: Abraham and his servants (v 19)33
Abraham - protagonist, calm? (probably internal turmoil?), obedient, prompt, maturing faith. “God will provide”)
Isaac - no resistance, no objections, young man, probably learning the faith of his father
servants - not that significant
angel of the Lord/God? - God tested (v. 1). Seemingly an antagonist at first, but as the story develops, God provides, sworn by himself the promise to Abraham, it turns out he’s more of a protagonist. “The Lord will provide.”
[Point of View: Note significance of narrative through direct statements by author, or indirect statements through a character.]
“God tested Abraham” (v. 1).
"The Lord will provide…on the mount of the Lord, it shall be provided” (v. 14).
[Literary Features: such as repetition, proportional spacing, decisive events, chiasm, inclusion, omission, change in time/actor, added genre]
Repetition - your son/only son/his son/my son, my son (vv. 2, 12, 16); burnt offering (v. 8); God will provide (vv. 8, 14).
Slowing down - vv. 9-10, slower pace, heighted drama, signify climax
Decisive event - Abraham about to kill his son with the knife before God interrupted him.

Even more telling is the twofold reference to Abraham’s obedience in the text itself: “By myself I have sworn, says the LORD: Because you have done this, and have not withheld your son, your only son, I will indeed [Wenham, “really”] bless you.… because you have obeyed my voice” (vv 16–18). Wenham speaks of “the meritoriousness of Abraham” and declares that “the central thrust of the story [is] Abraham’s wholehearted obedience and the great blessings that have flowed from it.”38

Historical Interpretation

Historical interpretation is interested in discovering the meaning of the text in its own historical-cultural context. For the interpretation of narrative, the historical questions concerning the author, the original audience, the time, setting, and purpose of writing are important, for they provide further clues to the purpose and meaning of a passage.

Under historical interpretation we need to ask two basic questions. First, What was the author’s intended meaning for his original hearers? We can answer this question by seeking answers to the five familiar questions: Who wrote this text? To whom? When? Where? And why?

The second basic question is, What need of the hearers did the author seek to address? Every text has a question behind the text, an issue that called the text into being. It may be idolatry, or lack of knowledge, or lack of justice, or lack of love for neighbor, or foreign alliances, or exile, or misplaced trust in large armies.

Historical interpretation of Genesis 22

[What was the author’s intended meaning for his original hearers?]
Moses - Israel. God tests his people’s faith and obedience (wilderness wanderings).
Stressing also sacrifices/burnt offerings as substitute for them
God’s assurance of the certainty of his promises, in part connected with Abraham’s faithful obedience.
God will provide a substitute for their deliverance.
[What need of the hearers did the author seek to address?]
Identification with Abraham: lack assurance of God’s promise, easier for them to disobey God’s command, esp. when they think that God’s commands doesn’t make sense.
If with Isaac: Are we going to live or die? How can we continue to live?

Theological Interpretation

The problem of preaching today: Man-centeredness
The purpose of historical narratives: God-centeredness
The pinnacle of Scriptural revelation: Christ-centeredness

The major question under theocentric interpretation is: What does this passage reveal about God, his redemptive acts, his covenant, his grace, his will for his people? The question about God in relation to his people is probably the most important question to ask to prevent the moralistic, imitation preaching so prevalent today. For basically the Bible is about God; it is his self-revelation to his people. This revelation naturally includes God’s will for his people, but this is usually revealed in divine laws and directions for human behavior rather than in fallible models of such behavior. In addition to preventing moralistic preaching, theocentric interpretation also provides an important link to Christ-centered preaching, as we shall see in Step 6.

Theocentric interpretation of Genesis 22

[What does the passage tell us about God and his will for his people?]
God’s testing his people (v. 1).
God will provide (vv. 8, 13, 14). Substitute for our redemption.
God’s promises of blessing to his people, and the nations (vv. 15-18).
[Other essential theological themes? Timeless life issues and principles? Relationship to theology of section/book?]
Faith assured by God’s promises
Obedience to God’s difficult commands, in light of God’s more staggering promises.
Review your results with the help of some good commentaries.
[What commentaries did you consult? What parts of your conclusions are affirmed? Any interpretations you need to correct? Any additional insights gained? Hint: You can try looking at Genesis commentaries by Waltke and Bruegemman, both available in Perlego]