Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.57LIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.58LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.61LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.69LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.92LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.81LIKELY
Extraversion
0.31UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.72LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
I have a problem.
I don’t like things on my hands.
As a result I wash my hands too often when I’m cooking.
Now, you may not see that as a problem, after all, cross contamination of various foods is never good.
But I do.
The other day, Danielle and I were preparing dinner together.
My job was to open up the salmon from its individually wrapped packages and then put salt and pepper on them.
I could not figure out how to do it without washing my hands several times.
I must have washed my hands 4 or 5 times that night.
When I eat French fries, I have to wipe my hands between each bite.
I think the bottom line is I can’t stand having stuff on my hands.
I don’t like being dirty.
I have a problem.
But, as I understand it, I’m not alone.
Today, as we continue our study in the Gospel of John, we’re going to consider his first miracle or “sign” which happened at a wedding.
This involved hand washing and so much more.
If you have your Bibles, let me encourage you to open them to the book of John, chapter 2. As we did last week, we’ll consider the contextual elements of the passage, and then we’ll reflect on some points of application.
Let’s begin with...
Reflections on the passage (John 2:1-12)
So, we’ve tried to leave some extra space in your outlines in case there are things in this passage that jump out at you.
Before we dive into the specifics of this passage, I think it’s important that we consider the context.
This chapter marks a new beginning.
Chapter 1 included the prologue and a bit of the ministry of John the Baptist.
Chapter 2 marks the beginning of what some commentators call the “book of signs” - chapters 2-12.
The final chapters of the book commentators refer to as the “book of glory” - chapters 13-21 - as Jesus displays his divinity to his disciples.
So Jesus, His mother and His disciples have been invited to a wedding.
The timing of this seems to indicate that it is happening 3 days after the preceding event - which was the calling of Philip and Nathanael.
Several of the commentators suggested that this wedding must have been among some close friends or family members to Mary.
Her concern over the lack of wine may indicate that she had a hand in the catering.
In their culture, a wedding celebration could last up to 7 days.
It became a very big deal.
To have the wine (or any of the food) run out would have been a gross oversight on the part of those who were in charge of the provisions - namely the grooms family.
This could have resulted in shame or disgrace on the part of the new couple and their extended family - not the best way to begin a marriage.
With Mary approaching Jesus with this concern, it is unclear exactly what she is expecting him to do or even what she believes he can do.
She is simply raising the issue.
As we read this in English, it sounds like Jesus is being disrespectful and harsh - calling his mother “woman.”
But this is the same Greek word that Jesus used when he addressed the Samaritan woman in chapter 4, the woman caught in adultery in chapter 8, his own mother on the cross in chapter 19, and Mary Magdalene after the resurrection in chapter 20.
(Burge).
It might be better understood if it was translated “Ma’am” (Carson).
While the Greek word is not an endearing term, it is not as distant as “woman.”
Jesus’ follow up question seems to be a sort of “measured rebuke.”
(Carson).
While his public ministry was just getting started, He seemed to be reluctant to go public enough to gain notoriety.
And yet, as we will see, while the miraculous sign that followed was a blessing to many, the people who understood what really happened was minimal.
Even with his response, Jesus must have indicated that he would do something, because Mary responds...
John then gives us a little context.
In Judaism, being ceremonially clean was important.
This is where my hand washing problem connects.
Ceremonial cleanliness indicated that a person could be present in a worship assembly.
It also indicated that someone could remain in immediate fellowship with others.
These jars, being made of stone, would be resistant to contamination.
They would also have likely been used to clean some utensils used for eating and drinking.
It’s unlikely that they would have been used as serving vessels.
The story continues…
So, somewhere between the time that the servants filled the jars with water and the master of the feast tasted the wine, the miracle happened.
Jesus bypassed months of harvesting, crushing, fermenting, and mixing - in a moment He turned the water into wine.
The MC even acknowledged that this was the best wine that had been served at the feast.
So, in this moment of turmoil, Jesus took what would could have been a shameful blot on the groom and seemed to bring him an added measure of honor by saving the best for last.
John then concludes this pericope, or event in Jesus ministry, with something that bible scholars call and inclusio.
Look in your bibles at verse 11.
John uses the exact same wording here as he did in verse 1 “at Cana in Galilee”.
(Carson) These statements seem to form a bookends to help us grasp the entirety of an event.
So John writes in verse 11...
We learned a couple of weeks ago that John hand-picked several “signs” in order to lay out his argument that Jesus is the Son of God.
His whole account of Jesus life is pointing people toward belief.
But, John, by using the word “sign” - does something interesting.
He is indicating that the miraculous activity of Jesus is more than a demonstration of his divine power - but they have more significance.
You see, John could have used different words to describe Jesus’ activity.
Sometimes the gospel writers would use the word dynameis or “mighty works” - but John never does.
Other times the writers us the word terata which often gets combined with the Greek word for “signs” to indicate “signs and wonders.”
But John is up to something different.
Carson notes:
Jesus’ miracles are never simply naked displays of power, still less neat conjuring tricks to impress the masses, but signs, significant displays of power that point beyond themselves to the deeper realities that could be perceived with the eyes of faith.
And this first sign has that affect on Jesus disciples.
These signs would give his followers a glimpse into His glory and divinity.
Do you remember back in chapter 1, in the prologue?
John wrote...
So this first sign revealed a bit of his glory, his true nature and resulted in his disciples believing in him.
They entrusted themselves to him.
After the wedding, John tells us...
Jesus and his growing entourage make their way about 30 miles east to the town of Capernaum on the coast of the sea of Galilee.
Points to ponder:
In considering this passage, I think it’s important that we reflect on a couple of things - maybe some more practical elements.
First, in this event at the wedding in Cana, we can see that...
Jesus addresses our earthly needs
There are times when we may feel like the needs or concerns of our lives are too small or mundane to worry the God of the universe, and yet I think that Jesus’ ability and willingness to act in this circumstance communicates that he understands.
He knew the shame that would befall this family.
Gary Burge reflects on this a bit in his commentary (p.
102):
There's a practical side to the story that we could easily miss, thanks to our zeal to collect some spiritual truth from the passage.
Jesus stepped into a wedding of good friends and fixed a simple problem.
They were out of wine and the crisis could prove socially tragic unless a remedy was found.
It is easy for us to spiritualize the work of Christ today and conclude that he is only in the business of saving souls and renewing lives.
But is he really interested in the commonplace elements of my life?
Is he really interested in the simple conundrums of every day living?
The Cana and a story says “yes”.
We can invite Christ into dilemmas that seem embarrassingly inconsequential – dilemmas that seem ridiculously practical – and ask him to help.
By virtue of the fact that Jesus - the Word of God - became flesh and dwelt with us gives us confidence and hope that he is aware of the challenges we face.
He knows what it’s like when that friend betrays you.
He feels the hurt when that loved one rebells or fall into sinful habits.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9