Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.16UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.52LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.41UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.14UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.88LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.54LIKELY
Extraversion
0.01UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.61LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.44UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
| THE AGES DIGITAL LIBRARY |
| SERMONS |
| *T**HE **M**ETROPOLITAN **T**ABERNACLE **P**ULPIT **VOL. 1 * |
| *(Sermons Nos.
1-53) * |
| */Published in 1855 /* |
| /by Charles Spurgeon / |
| *Books For The Ages * |
| *AGES Software • Albany, OR USA Version 1.0 © 1997 * |
| THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.
|
| NO. 1 |
| *A SERMON DELIVERED ON SABBATH MORNING, JANUARY 7TH, 1855, * |
| /BY THE REV. C. H. SPURGEON, / |
| *AT NEW PARK STREET CHAPEL, SOUTHWARK * |
| */“I am the Lord, I charge not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.”­Malachi.
3:6.
/* |
| IT has been said by some one that “the proper study of mankind is man.”
I will not oppose the idea, but I believe it is equally true that the proper study of God’s elect is God; the proper study of a Christian is the Godhead.
The highest science, the loftiest speculation, the mightiest philosophy, which can ever engage the attention of a child of God, is the name, the nature, the person, the work, the doings, and the existence of the great God whom he calls his Father.
There is something exceedingly improving to the mind in a contemplation of the Divinity.
It is a subject so vast, that all our thoughts are lost in its immensity; so deep, that our pride is drowned in its infinity.
Other subjects we can compass and grapple with; in them we feel a kind of self-content, and go our way with the thought, “Behold I am wise.”
But when we come to this master-science, finding that our plumb-line cannot sound its depth, and that our eagle eye cannot see its height, we turn away with the thoughts that vain man would be wise, but he is like a wild ass’s colt and with the solemn exclamation, “I am but of yesterday, and know nothing.”
No subject of contemplation will tend more to humble the mind, than thoughts of God.
We shall be obliged to feel |
| */“Great God, how infinite art thou, What worthless worms are we!” /* |
| But while the subject /humbles/ the mind it also /expands/ it.
He who often thinks of God, will have a larger mind than the man who simply plods around this narrow globe.
He may be a naturalist, boasting of his ability to |
| dissect a beetle, anatomize a fly, or arrange insects and animals in classes with well nigh unutterable names; he may be a geologist, able to discourse of the megatherium and the plesiosauras, and all kinds of extinct animals, he may imagine that his science, whatever it is, ennobles and enlarges his mind.
I dare say it does, but after all the most excellent study for expanding the soul is the science of Christ, and him crucified, and the knowledge of the Godhead in the glorious Trinity.
Nothing will so enlarge the intellect, nothing so magnify the whole soul of man, as a devout, earnest, continued investigation of the great subject of the Deity.
And, whilst humbling and expanding, this subject is eminently /consolatary/.
Oh, there is, in contemplating Christ, a balm for every wound, in musing on the Father, there is a quietus for every grief- and in the influence of the Holy Ghost, there is a balsam for every sore.
Would you lose your sorrows?
Would you drown your cares?
Then go plunge yourself in the Godhead’s deepest sea; be lost in his immensity; and you shall come forth as from a couch of rest, refreshed and invigorated.
I know nothing which can so comfort the soul, so calm the swelling billows of grief and sorrow; so speak peace to the winds of trial, as a devout musing upon the subject of the Godhead.
It is to that subject that I invite you this morning.
We shall present you with one view of it,-that is /the immutability of the glorious Jehovah/.
“I am,” says my text, “Jehovah,” (for so it should be translated) “I am Jehovah, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.”
|
| There are three things this morning.
First of all, /an unchanging God/; secondly, /the persons who derive benefit from this glorious attribute/, “the sons of Jacob;” and thirdly, /the beneath they so derive/, they “are not consumed.”
We address ourselves to these points.
|
| *I.
*First of all, we have set before us the doctrine of THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.
“I am God, I change not.”
Here I shall attempt to expound, or rather to enlarge the thought, and then afterwards to bring a few arguments to prove its truth.
|
|   |
| *1.*
I shall offer some exposition of my text, by first saying, that God is Jehovah, and he changes not /in his essence/.
We cannot tell you what Godhead is.
We do not know what substance that is which we call God.
It is an existence, it is a being; but what that is we know not.
However, whatever it is, we call it his essence, and that essence never changes.
The substance of mortal things is ever changing.
The mountains with their snow-white crowns, doff their old diadems in summer, in rivers trickling |
| down their sides, while the storm cloud gives them another coronation; the ocean, with its mighty floods, loses its water when the sunbeams kiss the waves, and snatch them in mists to heaven; even the sun himself requires fresh fuel from the hand of the Infinite Almighty, to replenish his everburning furnace.
All creatures change.
Man, especially as to his body, is always undergoing revolution.
Very probably there is not a single particle in my body which was in it a few years ago.
This frame has been worn away by activity, its atoms have been removed by friction, fresh particles of matter have in the mean time constantly accrued to my body, and so it has been replenished- but its substance is altered.
The fabric of which this world is made is ever passing away; like a stream of water, drops are running away and others are following after, keeping the river still full, but always changing in its elements.
But God is perpetually the same.
He is not composed of any substance or material, but is spirit-pure, essential, and ethereal spirit-and therefore he is immutable.
He remains everlastingly the same.
There are no furrows on his eternal brow.
No age hath palsied him- no years have marked him with the mementoes of their flight- he sees ages pass, but with him it is ever /now/.
He is the great I AM-the Great Unchangeable.
Mark you, his essence did not undergo a change when it became united with the manhood.
When Christ in past years did gird himself with mortal clay the essence of his divinity was not changed; flesh did not become God, nor did God become flesh by a real actual change of nature the two were united in hypostatical union, but the Godhead was still the same.
It was the same when he was a babe in the manger, as it was when he stretched the curtains of heaven- it was the same God that hung upon the cross, and whose blood flowed down in a purple river, the self-same God that holds the world upon his everlasting shoulders, and bears in his hands the keys of death and hell.
He never has been changed in his essence, not even by his incarnation- he remains everlastingly, eternally, the one unchanging God, the Father of lights, with whom there is no variableness, neither the shadow of a change.
|
| *2.*
He changes not /in his attributes/.
Whatever the attributes of God were of old, that they are now; and of each of them we may sing ‘As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, Amen.
“Was he /powerful/?
Was he the mighty God when he spake the world out of the womb of non-existence?
Was he the Omnipotent when he piled the mountains and scooped out the hollow places for the rolling deep?
Yes, he was powerful then, and his arm is unpalsied now; he is the same giant in his |
 
| might; the sap of his nourishment is undried, and the strength of his soul stands the same for ever.
Was he wise when he constituted this mighty globe, when he laid the foundations of the universe?
Had he /wisdom/ when he planned the way of our salvation, and when from all eternity he marked out his awful plans?
Yes and he is wise now he is not less skillful, he has not less knowledge, his eye which seeth all things is undimned, his ear which heareth all the cries, sighs sobs, and groans of his people, is not rendered heavy by the years which he hath heard their prayers.
He is unchanged in his wisdom; he knows as much now as ever, neither more nor less; he has the same consummate skill, and the same infinite forecastings.
He is unchanged, blessed be his name, in his /justice/.
Just and holy was he in the past, just and holy is he now.
He is unchanged in his /truth/;- he has promised, and he brings it to pass; he hath said it, and it shall be done.
He varies not in the /goodness/, and generosity, and benevolence of his nature.
He is not become an Almighty tyrant, whereas he was once an Almighty Father; but his strong love stands like a granite rock, unmoved by the hurricanes of our iniquity.
And blessed be his dear name, he is unchanged in his /love/.
When he first wrote the covenant, how full his heart was with affection to his people.
He knew that his Son must die to ratify the articles of that agreement.
He knew right well that he must rend his best beloved from his bowels, and send him down to earth to bleed and die.
He did not hesitate to sign that mighty covenant; nor did he shun its fulfillment.
He loves as much now as he did then; and when suns shall cease to shine, and moons to show their feeble light, he still shall love on for ever and for ever.
Take any one attribute of God, and I will write /semper idem/ on it (always the same.)
Take any one thing you can say of God now, and it may be said not only in the dark past, but in the bright future it shall always remain the same: “I am Jehovah, I change not.”
|
| Impress’d on his heart it remains.
Then again, God chances not in his /plans/.
That man began to build, but was not able to finish, and therefore he changed his plan, as every wise man would do in such a case- he built upon a smaller foundation and commenced again.
But has it ever been said that God began to build but was not able to finish?
Nay.
When he hath boundless stores at his command, and when his own right hand would create worlds as numerous as drops of morning dew, shall he ever stay because he has not power?
and reverse, or alter, or disarrange his plan, because he cannot carry it out?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9