Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.18UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.15UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.5UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.44UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.01UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.78LIKELY
Extraversion
0.15UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.75LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.73LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*“The Virgin Birth”*
 
[This sermon is OK in outline, but the detail needs to be thought through a little more.
MA 17-1-05]
/what the critics say/
In a recent poll conducted by Newsweek Magazine 1009 adults were asked about Christ and His birth.
If Jesus had never born, people believed there would be:
 
63% - less charity
61% - less kindness
59% - less personal happiness
58% - less tolerance
47% - more war (16% say less, 26% say the same)
38% - less religious divisions (21% say more, 26% say the same)
 
Another interesting question was, “What do people believe about the birth of Christ?
“ Of the 1009 respondents,
 
67% - believe that the entire story of Christmas is historically accurate (including the virgin birth)
24% - believe the story of Christmas is a theological invention (a story invented by the early church)
 
These results suggest that most people believe that the gospel writers got it right – that the Christmas story found in the Bible is historically accurate.
They may not consider it a life-changing story – but most people seem to believe the story is true.
Even so, in the popular press the story about Jesus’ birth is up for grabs - especially the virgin birth.
"I don't want to be too simplistic, but our faith is somewhat childlike," says the Rev. H. B. London, a vice president of James Dobson's Focus on the Family organization.
“Though other people may question the historical validity of the virgin birth, and the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, we don't".
It’s a weak response.
London’s prepared to have “a head in the sand” approach – the naïve acceptance of a child – even it means exchanging faith for facts.
It only gets worse.
John Shelby Spong is an Episcopalian bishop who has written much, and most unfortunately a best selling book called, “/Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism/”.
On page 215 he writes, “Am I suggesting that these stories of the virgin birth (i.e. the ones from Matthew and Luke) are not literally true?
The answer is simple and direct, ‘Yes’.
Of course, these narratives are not literally true.
Stars do not wander, angels do not sing, virgins do not give birth, magi do not travel to a distant land to present gifts to a baby, and shepherds do not go in search of a newborn saviour….The virgin birth of the New Testament is not literally true”.
It’s important we recognise that in our postmodern world the Bible is under attack, and the aggressors are not just predictably from this world, but also from within the church.
And so the words of 1 Jn 2:19 ring true, “They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us.
For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us”.
I think this is true of John Shelby Song and many other commentators  - the Bible is a public document and it’s a big world out there – the scrutiny is intense.
These days I’m a little relunctant to call myself a “fundamentalist” as it suggests I’m stupid, ignorant and irrational.
It also tends to aligns me with Islamic extremists – and anyone else sympathetic with terrorism.
But I am happy to align myself with the Gospel writers and I’m happy to believe their historic accounts of the life of Jesus.
Spong mightn’t know any reputable Bible scholar who accepts the fact of the virgin birth – but I do – evangelical scholarship accounts for itself very well, thankyou very much!
Now we haven’t time tonight to respond to those who criticise the birth stories - but it would be foolish not to admit that the guild of secular and liberal Bible scholars have set the modern agenda for Bible reading.
But the reporting of the virgin birth as history can be defended – if this is a troublesome area for you then we’d love to continue the conversation with you afterwards.
/What the Bible says/
Let’s move into the Bible recognising its true character as the Word of God.
We see in Luke 1 that an angel appears to Mary and says to her in Luke 1:30, “Do not be afraid, Mary, you have found favor with God.
You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.
He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High.
The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever; his kingdom will never end.”
“How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?”
The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.
So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God”.
Mary is surprised – she cannot bear a child because she is still a virgin.
The response is that the Holy Spirit will, as the NIV translates, “overshadow” her.
The Spirit “overshadowing” situations is nothing new in the Bible.
The coming of the Spirit upon Mary compares with the descending of the glory of the Lord upon the tabernacle in Ex. 40:35.
The psalms also remind us that when God “overshadows” his people he moves to protect them – Ps 91:4 for example.
The glory of God descending upon his people – YHWH protecting his people - Mary overshadowed with the Holy Spirit in a wonderful act of re-creation.
God’s powerful presence will rest upon Mary, so that she will bear a child who will be the Son of God – the Son of the Most High.
So why is the virgin birth important to us?
 
/salvation comes from the Lord/
Firstly, it reminds us that salvation comes from the Lord.
We see this in verses 31 and 32.
The name Jesus means, “God saves”.
Then there’s the reference to Jesus having the throne David.
In 2 Sam.
7 God promises King David that that he will raise up an offspring whose kingdom will be eternal.
2 Sam.
7:13, “He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.
I will be his father, and he will be my son”.
The writer to the Hebrews applies “I will be his father, and he will be my son” to Jesus.
Jesus will reign over the house of David forever.
Jesus is a King whose rule will never end.
This King Jesus will be called the Son of the Most High – the Son of God – the one who Mary will later say is “my Saviour” – interesting that Mary needs a Saviour!
Notice that when Luke mentions the virgin the birth, his emphasis is upon God rather than Mary.
And so Jesus is not the high point of human evolution, but the intervention of a transcendent God into human history.
Salvation comes from the Lord.
The child to be born is the Son of God – the one who saves – the King in David’s line who will rule forever.
Remember back in Genesis 3 the serpent is cursed.
God says, “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel”.
God promises that the seed of the woman will ultimately destroy the serpent.
And so God raises up a victorious seed – it is his doing – the virgin birth reminds us that we cannot save ourselves – God must marvelously intervene to produce the seed who saves – salvation never comes through human effort but must be the work of God himself.
Salvation is God’s work from beginning to end.
Look please at Jn 1:12, “Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God”.
To deny the virgin birth is to deny the possibility of salvation.
It’s a great relief to know that salvation comes from the Lord – that God acts supernaturally in my life and your life so that by faith we may belong to the household of God.
In 2002 Denise Banderman was a youth ministry student at Hannibal-LaGrange College in Missouri.
The day came for the class to sit their final exam.
When Denise and her fellow students opened their papers they were astonished to find every answer filled in.
At the bottom of the page was a message that read: "This is the end of the exam.
All the answers on your test are correct.
You will receive an A on the final exam.
The reason you passed the test is because the creator of the test took it for you.
All the work you did in preparation for this test did not help you get the A. You have just experienced ... grace."
\\ \\ The course lecturer, Dr. Hufty, spoke to the students about the exam.
He said, "Some things you learn from lectures, some things you learn from research, but some things you can only learn from experience.
You've just experienced grace.
One hundred years from now, if you know Jesus Christ as your personal Saviour, your name will be written down in a book, and you will have had nothing to do with writing it there.
That will be the ultimate grace experience”.
Do not underestimate the grace of God in your life.
Live as people under grace, free from the condemnation of sin, living each day focused on walking and talking with the Lord.
Lives of thanksgiving - our Creator acts to save us – the virgin birth - the Son of God* *– our rebirth and redemption in Christ.
Gal.
4:4-5, “But when the time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under law, to redeem those under law, that we might receive the full rights of sons”.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9