Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.17UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.2UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.96LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.49UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.17UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.4UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.63LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*V.* *Instructions concerning Guarding the Truth in the Church (3:14-4:16).*
/A./ /The church and its truth (3:14-16)/
*3:14.*
If Paul had left Timothy at Ephesus to pastor the church (cf.
1:3), he also hoped to rejoin Timothy there soon.
In the meantime, in case of delay Paul wanted the Ephesian pastor and congregation to have *these instructions *in hand.
The “instructions” no doubt refer to what has come before as well as the exhortations to follow.
*3:15.*
The clearly stated purpose of these instructions is to inform the Ephesian congregation *how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household.
*Again Paul used the analogy of the “household” (/oikos/) to refer to the church (ekklēsia; cf.
v. 5).
This merges into an architectural image involving the church as *pillar and foundation of the truth.
*The idea of the church as a “building” dedicated to *the living God *is a common one for Paul (cf. 1 Cor.
3:16-17; 2 Cor.
6:16; Eph.
2:20-22).
Some people teach that the church as the “foundation of the truth” is the /source /of God’s truth, that no one can know the truth unless he depends on the teaching of some organized church or church group.
But Paul was simply affirming the crucial role of the universal church as the support and bulwark—not the source—of God’s truth.
His words should not be stretched beyond this.
*3:16.*
Paul had been discussing proper godly conduct in the church, behavior which is in every way consistent with the truth, rather than “contrary to the sound doctrine” (1:10).
In 3:16 he expressed a simple idea which becomes difficult due only to its compactness.
This truth about *godliness *being a *mystery *means that it was hidden but now is revealed.
Further, it *is *a *great *(/mega, /“large, important”) “mystery” in that it is overwhelmingly large in scope and sublimely important in significance (cf.
Eph.
5:32).
Paul cited the content of this truth in the form of an excerpt from an early hymn about Christ, who is the essence of the “mystery” (Col.
1:27).
Whether the fragment should be divided into two or three parts is disputed.
Whichever one chooses, the six elements of the excerpt are as follows: (1) *Appeared in a body *refers to the Incarnation of Christ.
(2) *Was vindicated by the Spirit *refers to God’s demonstration through the Resurrection (cf.
Acts 2:24-36), by the Holy Spirit (cf.
Rom.
8:11), that the crucified Jesus is Lord and Messiah.
(3) *Was seen by angels *refers to His exaltation before the heavenly realm (cf.
Phil.
2:9-11; Col. 2:15; Heb.
1:6).
(4) *Was preached among the nations *(cf.
Col. 1:23) and (5) *was believed on in the world *refer to the progressive fulfillment of God’s redemptive plan through His preordained means (cf. 1 Cor.
1:18-2:5).
(6) *Was taken up in glory *refers to the Ascension (Eph.
4:10).
[1]
*And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory [1 Tim.
3:16].*
This verse probably constitutes one of the earliest creeds of the church.
Some think that it was one of the songs of the early church.
“Without controversy”—means confessedly, or obviously.
“Great is the mystery of godliness.”
The mystery of godliness is that God in the person of Jesus Christ entered this world in which we live, paid the penalty of sin, and is making men and women godly—that is, with Godlikeness.
“God was manifest in the flesh.”
Certainly Paul is teaching the virgin birth of Christ, but he is also speaking of Christ’s existence before His incarnation.
That existence was spiritual: He was “… in the form of God …” (Phil.
2:6).
Hebrews speaks of Christ as “… being the brightness [effulgence] of his [God’s] glory, and the express image of his person …” (Heb.
1:3).
The Lord Jesus Himself said, “God is a Spirit …” (John 4:24).
Now from this condition as God—not seen with human eyes—Christ came into manifestation—into sight—in the flesh.
He became a man and entered into human conditions.
And under these human conditions the attributes of His essential spiritual personality were veiled.
This is the thought John gives in his gospel: “… The Word was made [became] flesh.”
He was /born/ flesh “and dwelt [pitched His tent here] among us …” (see John 1:14).
Just as God was not visible in the tabernacle in the wilderness, so Jesus Christ was veiled when He tabernacled among us in human flesh.
He did not appear to men what He really was; man did not recognize who He was.
The One who in the beginning was God, was with God, and who made all things, became a little, helpless baby.
He was the image of the invisible God and had all power in heaven and in earth, but down here He took upon Himself human flesh.
Because He was not recognized by man, He was treated as an imposter, a usurper, and a blasphemer.
He was hated, persecuted, and murdered.
God manifest in the flesh was poor, was tempted and tried, and actually shed tears.
“Justified in the Spirit.”
Yet in all that, He was not justified in the flesh, but in the Spirit.
He was manifest in the /flesh/—that is how the world saw Him; but He was justified or vindicated in the /Spirit/ in His resurrection.
There were times when His glory broke out down here; there were revelations and expressions and witnesses of who He really was.
There were angels at His virgin birth.
His glory was seen at His baptism, at His transfiguration, and at the time of His arrest.
The things that occurred at the time of His crucifixion caused the watching centurion to say, “Truly this was the Son of God” (see Matt. 27:54).
But it was when He came back from the dead that we see Him now justified.
He was manifest in the flesh, but justified in the Spirit: “sown a natural body; raised a spiritual body” (see 1 Cor.
15:44).
No enemy laid a hand upon Him after He was raised from the dead.
He will never be dishonored again.
However, because He came down here and has now returned to the right hand of God, /we/ can be justified.
Down here He was delivered up for our offenses—He took our place as a sinner, and now He gives us His place up yonder and we are justified.
How wonderful this is!
“Seen of angels”—it doesn’t say that He saw angels; rather, they saw Him.
He has gone back to heaven, and now all the created intelligences of heaven worship Him because He wrought redemption for mankind.
Little man down here hasn’t caught on yet, but the song that will be sung throughout eternity is the song of redemption.
“Preached unto the Gentiles [the nations]”—this is still happening today.
“Believed on in the world.”
Many today are trusting Him as their Savior.
“Received up into glory.”
Today Christ is at God’s right hand.
At this very moment, my friend, He is there.
Have you talked to Him today?
Have you told Him that you love Him, and have you thanked Him for all He has done?
How wonderful He is![2]
\\ !! Christian Existentialism
!! Kierkegaardian Themes
Søren Kierkegaard
Christian existentialism relies on three major assumptions drawn from Kierkegaard's unique understanding of Christianity.
*The first *is that the universe is fundamentally paradoxical, and that the greatest paradox of all is the transcendent union of God and man in the person of Christ.
The *second *concerns having a personal relationship with God that supersedes all prescribed moralities, social structures and communal norms.
The *third* asserts that following social conventions is essentially a personal aesthetic choice made by individuals.
Kierkegaard proposes that each of us must make independent choices that will then compose our existence.
*No imposed structures—even Biblical commandments—can alter the responsibility of individuals to seek to please God in whatever personal and paradoxical way God chooses to be pleased.
Each individual suffers the anguish of indecision until he or she makes a leap of faith and commits to a particular choice*.
*Each person is faced with the responsibility of knowing of his or her own free will and with the fact that a choice, even a wrong choice, must be made in order to live authentically*.
Kierkegaard also upholds the idea that *every human being exists in one of three spheres *(or on planes) *of existence, the aesthetic, ethical, and religious*.
Most people, he observed, live an *aesthetic life in which nothing matters but appearances, pleasures, and happiness*.
It is in accordance with the desires of this sphere that people follow social conventions.
Kierkegaard also considered the violation of social conventions for personal reasons (e.g., in the pursuit of fame, reputation for rebelliousness) to be a personal aesthetic choice.
A much smaller group are those *people who live in the ethical sphere, who do their best to do the right thing and see past the shallow pleasantries and ideas of society*.
The third and highest sphere is *the faith sphere.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9