Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.19UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.22UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.5UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.62LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.42UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.88LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.63LIKELY
Extraversion
0.16UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.14UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.83LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The third chapter of Nehemiah consists exclusively of Nehemiah’s description of the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem that took place under his leadership.
Altogether forty-two sections of wall were rebuilt, including ten gates and four towers.
Later in the book, Nehemiah mentions two more gates: the Gate of Ephraim (Neh.
8:16) and the Prison Gate (Neh.
12:39).
This takes the total number of gates to twelve, which is the same number of gates that we find in the New Jerusalem in the book of Revelation (Rev.
21:12).
Interestingly, Nehemiah gave us the only complete list of Jerusalem’s gates in the entire Bible.
According to Psalm 87:2, /The LORD loveth the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob/.
Nehemiah’s account is very methodical.
He began with the Sheep Gate in the northeast corner of the city near the Pool of Siloam (cf.
John 5:2).
Archaeologists have been able to identify this area.
The rest of the work he described in a counterclockwise rotation.
He also gave us a fair amount of information about those who worked on the wall.
Some were priests and Levites (vv. 1, 17).
Others were goldsmiths and perfumers (v.
8), rulers (v.
12) and merchants (v.
32).
There were even some women who lent a helping hand (v.
12).
Most of these folks worked on the stretch of wall that was nearest to their own homes, and their cooperation shows that they were united in their purpose and mission.
Nehemiah took great care to record the names of most of the workers.
Although many of these people are unknown to us today, the fact that he recorded them reminds us that they were real people whom the Lord used to accomplish a great task.
They are therefore examples of godliness as they labored to repair the city and trusted the Lord to bless their effort.
!
The Sheep Gate
The first person to act, according to verse 1, was Eliashib the high priest.
Jeshua, his grandfather, (cf.
Neh.
12:10) was the high priest when Zerubbabel led the first group of captives back to Jerusalem about ninety years earlier (Ezra 3:2).
From what we can tell, Eliashib was probably about eighty years old when he /rose up with his brethren/ to build the Sheep Gate.
He and the other priests repaired and dedicated the Sheep Gate and then rebuilt the wall to the Tower of Meah and the Tower of Hananeel.
From this we learn that the religious leaders of God’s people were the first to act, and so it should be.
As leaders, they need to lead.
Here we note that even Eliashib’s advanced age did not keep him from participating.
Nor was he like the late British humorist Jerome K. Jerome, who once said, “I like work, it fascinates me.
I can sit and look at it for hours.”
On the other hand, Eliashib was not a completely honorable man.
Here he seems to be honorable, but toward the end of the book we learn that he betrayed the cause.
On one of Nehemiah’s trips back to Persia, Eliashib not only established an alliance with Tobiah (which was probably as a result of a marriage) but also gave him access to the storage rooms of the temple (Neh.
13:4–5).
These two things were offenses of the highest order and show that his heart was not right before God.
That’s probably why we read nothing about him between chapter 3, where he seems to have been doing a good work, and chapter 13, where he undermined Nehemiah’s service.
The fact that Nehemiah’s account of the work begins with the Sheep Gate is especially important, since this particular gate was especially important to Jewish life.
It was named the Sheep Gate because it was the gate through which worshipers brought their sheep to the temple for sacrifice.
There was also a sheep market nearby where those who had come from a distance could buy the animals needed for sacrifice.
Some commentators have noted that this gate was the only one of the major gates concerning which there is no mention of locks and bars.
I’m not saying that it didn’t have locks and bars, but only that Nehemiah doesn’t say anything about them.
This gives a sense of the gate always being open and the Lord always ready to receive the sacrifices of his people.
This is also the only gate that the priests sanctified separately from the rest of the wall.
In fact, verse 1 mentions this detail twice so that we don’t miss it.
This shows the importance of the Sheep Gate to the work of the priests.
Next to Eliashib we have the men of Jericho doing their part in verse 2, which shows that the workforce was not limited to residents of Jerusalem.
Throughout this chapter, we’ll see many other people from various places contributing to the work as well.
Of course, the residents of Jerusalem were not the only ones who should have had an interest in the rebuilding of the wall.
Every Jew should have should have shared David’s desire for the Lord to build the walls of Jerusalem (Ps.
51:18).
!
The Fish Gate
The next gate was the Fish Gate, which was on the northwest side of the city facing the Mediterranean Sea.
This gate was used primarily for fishmongers to bring their wares to the market, as we see the men of Tyre doing later in chapter 13 (v.
16).
Just as there was a sheep market near the Sheep Gate, there was also a fish market near this gate.
The people who worked on the wall between this gate and the next one were quite interesting for several reasons.
One named whose name was Meremoth was the son of Urijah, who, according to Ezra 8:33, was a priest.
But what’s interesting about this individual is not his priestly descent but the fact that he is the first person in this chapter that worked on two parts of the wall.
After finishing the part that was assigned to him, verse 21 says that he repaired a section in front of Eliashib’s house.
He seems to have been both diligent and committed to the work of the Lord.
The next individual was not as devoted as Meremoth.
Meshullam, who seems to have had an elder-like role later in the book (cf.
8:4, et al.) and also helped work on two sections of the wall, had allowed his daughter to marry Tobiah’s son (cf.
ch.
6:17–18).
Chapter 6 records this information to show how it was that Tobiah had acquired specific information about the status of the wall project.
The fact that Tobiah’s two sons-in-law were allowed in the city gave them access to this information.
Next in line were the men of Tekoa, which was most famous for being the birthplace of the prophet Amos (Amos 1:1).
The rank and file Tekoite not only worked on his own section of the wall, but also helped elsewhere (v.
27).
But there is more going on here.
The overall picture that Nehemiah presents to us is one of unity and cooperation.
The people work together toward a common goal.
But here Nehemiah was also realistic.
The nobles of Tekoa, as the KJV puts it, /put not their necks to the work of the Lord/ (v. 5).
Thankfully, their dampened enthusiasm for the work did not prevent other Tekoites from giving it their all.
!
The Old Gate
From there we move on to the Old Gate in Nehemiah’s counterclockwise description of the work.
Jehoiada repaired this gate with the help of another man named Meshullam.
Various Gibeonites, Meronothites and others continued the work to the Broad Wall (v.
8).
The stretch of the wall known as the Broad Wall had had a very interesting history long before Nehemiah came long.
Joash, king of Israel, tore this part of the wall down in a conflict with Amaziah, king of Judah (II Chron.
25:23).
A few years later, Uzziah, king of Judah, rebuilt it (II Chron.
26:9) and made it so strong that, when the Babylonians sacked the city, they were unable to knock it down.
It was probably still standing in Nehemiah’s day, though it may not have been in good repair.
We don’t really know what its condition was, but verse 8 seems to indicate that it was more or less skipped over.
The Jews only worked up to where the Broad Wall began and then resumed at the other end.[1]
Among the workers on this part of the wall were the men of Gibeon and Mizpah.
A thousand years earlier, the men of Gibeon had tricked Joshua into making a covenant with them.
When Joshua discovered their deception, he condemned them to perpetual servitude, which would have continued if King Saul had not violated Joshua’s covenant.
In any case, Gibeon lay within the bounds of Benjamin and was, along with its suburbs, allotted to the priests.
Mizpah, on the other hand, was situated about three miles from Gibeon.
It was one of the three cities that Samuel visited as judge on his circuit and it had been fortified by King Asa to protect the south against northern aggression.
However, neither city would have considered itself Jewish property, especially not in earlier periods of history, and Nehemiah made it clear in verse 7 that these people were not even under his control.
Yet, they chose to contribute to the work anyway.
It’s possible that they considered themselves Jews in Nehemiah’s day.
They may have intermarried with the Jews, and they certainly benefited from the protection of Judah.
Verse 11 mentions the Tower of the Furnaces (v.
11).
No one really knows what this was, but it may have been a tower near the baking ovens mentioned in Jeremiah 37:21.
Again, we find quite a variety of workers on this part of the wall.
We have goldsmiths and apothecaries in verse 8.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9