Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.19UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.18UNLIKELY
Fear
0.17UNLIKELY
Joy
0.16UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.34UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.98LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.45UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.21UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.39UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.52LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*sDefiled** and Rebellious Dreamers*
 
Jud 1:3-10 KJV  Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort /you/ that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
(4)  For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
(5)  I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
(6)  And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
(7)  Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
(8)  Likewise also these /filthy/ dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
(9)  Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
(10)  But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
As Jude both reviews and transitions into his next thoughts he mentions that the apostates of his day had apostatized in these ways—
#.
Like Sodom and Gomorrah, they defiled their flesh through sexual deviance.
#.
Like the angels, they despised proper authority and usurped roles and responsibilities that were not theirs.
#.
Like unbelieving Israel, they spoke evil of authority.
(Term wider than simply speaking against angels.)
* *
*III.
The Judgment of Apostasy*
          In every case, God’s judgment fell upon the apostates.
Jude is reinforcing the fact that he has mentioned earlier—the false teachers faced a certain condemnation.
Our God is a consuming fire!
He is just!
 
*IV.
Application*
* Let us be aware of the nature of apostates, so that we may resist their message.
* Let us be aware of the nature of apostates, so that we may resist their influence.
* Let us be aware of the end of apostates, so that we may not envy them.
* Let us be aware of the end of apostates, so that we might strive to avoid such an end.
"Our heart, reason, history, and the work of Christ convince us that without Him we cannot achieve our goal, that without Him we are doomed by God, and only Christ can save us."
These were deep and sensitive thoughts for a 17-year-old, revealing spiritual wisdom that few attain.
He had been baptized into the Lutheran church in 1824, at age six, and was confirmed at 16. Now, to graduate from high school, he had been required to write an essay on a religious subject.
He chose to explore "The union of believers with Christ, according to St. John's Gospel (John 15:1-14), an exposition on its basic essence, its absolute necessity and its consequences."
The fruit of our union with Christ, he continued, is our willingness "to sacrifice ourselves for our fellow man."
And the "joy which the Epicureans in their superficial philosophy sought in vain... is a joy known only to the innocent heart united with Christ, and through Christ to God."
So wrote Karl Heinrich Marx, but by 1844, nine years later, he had abandoned any Christian devotion he may have once felt.
Marx's adolescent writings exhibited a spirit of Christian devotion and longing for self-sacrifice on behalf of humanity.
Later at the University of Berlin, he fell under the influence of a young lecturer in theology named Bruno Bauer who was developing the idea that the Christian gospels were a record not of history but of human fantasies arising from men's emotional needs and that Jesus had not been an historical person.
Marx also enrolled in a course of lectures given by Bauer on the prophet Isaiah.
Bauer taught that a new social catastrophe "more tremendous" than that of the advent of Christianity was in making.
He would eventually call religion the opiate of the masses.
In fact, his militant atheism and philosophical ideas of man's struggle for a classless utopia free from the numbing effects of religion, established him as one of the most influential figures of the 20th century.
-- From Moody Monthly, June 1988.
/ /
/Jude writes these words with a very specific group in mind.
As such we ought not expect every description of Jude to fit every apostate in the world.
Yet in his words we find clues and guidelines which help us to be aware, to guard ourselves from such influence, and to examine our own selves lest we find in ourselves such things.
/
/ /
I. Dreamers—Their relationship to God’s Word
          Jude describes these apostates as “dreamers.”
What is his point?
It is possible that he is saying that they are blissfully unaware of the coming judgment; that this slumber is a reference to apathy concerning the certainty of coming doom.
Perhaps their immoral passions have blinded their minds to this certainty.
I think that the word is describing a deluded mind in general, not just delusion regarding their end!
That is, they are numb to the truth of God.
Just as the sleeping man is removed from the reality of the world around him, so these apostates are removed from the reality of the truth of God.
Alford—“the state of dreaming in the sleep of sin.”
It is also very possible that these false teachers elevated their own ideas and opinions (metaphorically “dreams”) above the truth of God.
Or even that they claimed a specific special revelation through literal dreams.
/How often has this been the case of apostates?
/
/ /
So the irony of this is that the very ones who seek to lead others into spiritual truth are themselves numb to it!
II.
Defilers—Their relationship to their own bodies (impacting also the flesh of others)
          They defile their bodies through sexual deviance.
Perverted views on the gift of sex and perverted actions in that area.
The word points to a continual state or action.
So far from bringing people up in the path of righteousness, these people are personally unrighteous and defiled!
III.
Despisers—Their relationship to authority (internally speaking)
          They despise dominions.
They reject authority./
reject, refuse, ignore; make invalid, set aside; break / It is a mark of false teachers and apostates that they have a bad attitude toward authority, both civil and spiritual.
Within their heart there burns a rebellious disposition.
Their rebellion does not end in their disposition toward leaders in this earthly realm, but also to Christ Himself!
/We serve no sovereign here!/
Those who desire the following of others revolts against the idea of themselves being under authority.
IV.
Disparagers—Their relationship to authority (externally speaking)
          Who are these dignities?
It is possible that these dignities are angels.
(dodzas)
—the word has heavenly connections (“glory” many places, “glory that will be revealed”)
—the example immediately afterward is one of angelic conflict
—the example found in the parallel passage in 2 Peter 2:10-11 also may speak of angelic conflict (speak evil of them)
          If these are angels then are we speaking of evil angels, good angels, or both?
—Evil angels, since the following example is that of Michael refusing to slander the top evil angel, Satan.
—Evil angels.
They like the sons of Sceva take the forces of darkness lightly.
They speak evil of what they do not understand.
—Elect angels, since only good angels reflect God’s glory and could be termed “glorious ones.”
—Elect angels, because this is an overflow of their hatred for the commandments of God.
Angels were in a special relationship to the Law of God.
Act 7:53 KJV  Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept /it./
Gal 3:19 KJV  Wherefore then /serveth/ the law?
It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; /and/ /it/ /was/ ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Heb 2:2 KJV  For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompense of reward;
 
          Is it possible that the term is wider than the specific examples given?
Is it likely that these false teachers not only had a rebellious disposition toward angelic authority, but also other authorities ordained by God (particularly spiritual) and expressed it in open slander?
If I say that a student has a disrespectful mouth toward authority and then give a positive example of a student who might seem to have a right to mouth off to his English teacher, does that mean that I only have English teachers in view?
Not necessarily.
It would also appear to me that if there is a term in this verse that ought to directly apply to angels, it would be dominions.
This term or a form of it is used twice to unmistakably refer to classifications of angels.
Col 1:16 KJV  For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether /they/ /be/ thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: Eph 1:21 KJV  Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:
The term “dominions” here is understood to apply to a wider group than angels by every commentator that I consulted.
Why not dodzas?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9