Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.5LIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.49UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.25UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.53LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.07UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.82LIKELY
Extraversion
0.31UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.63LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*“The Gospel” Galatians 1:1-5*
Everton Community Church.
Sunday August 10th 2008.
For some time know, the world has been in anticipation of the current *Summer Olympic games* *in Beijing China*.
*One central issue* surrounding these games has been *the issue of freedom* and *human rights violations in **China*.
*Chinese Communist leaders* have been *heavily criticized* for their *crackdown on dissent* *in the weeks leading up to the **Beijing** Games.*
In *a speech delivered this week in **Bangkok*, *U.
S.** President Bush denounced* the *detention of political dissidents* and *religious activists*.
He said:
*Quote: "*America stands in firm opposition to *China**'s detention* of *political dissidents*, *human rights advocates* and *religious activists*.
We speak out for a *free press*, *freedom of assembly* and *labour rights*, not to antagonize China's leaders, but because trusting its people with greater freedom is the only way for *China** to develop its full potential*.*"*
(http:~/~/www.nationalpost.com~/news~/story.html?id=706940)
*The Chinese government* has maintained that *Bush* is not an authority on China *One way to deny the truthfulness of a message* is to *deny the authority* *of the one who gives it.*
*The Galatian church* had *received the true gospel of grace from Paul* and *had believed it* *until some false teachers came in* *after he was gone*.
They not only *attacked the validity of the message* but also *that of the messenger*.
Apparently the *Judaizers* had *convinced some of the Galatian church members* that *Paul* was *a self-appointed apostle *with *no divine commission*.
So *at the outset of the letter* *Paul dispensed with the usual personal greetings* and *immediately began to establish* the *genuineness of his apostolic authority*, which he *later* (1:11–2:21) *expands on in detail*.
*In this brief salutation* *Paul summarizes* *1)* *His authority* (his right to speak), *2)* *His message* (the truths he speaks), and *3)* *His motive* (his reason for speaking).
*In understanding these*, we understand *the power* and *freedom of life in Christ.*
 
1) The Authority (Galatians 1:1-2)
*Galatians 1:1-2**  * [1:1]*Paul*, *an apostle*--*not from men* *nor through man*, but through Jesus Christ and *God the Father, who raised him from the dead*-- [2]and *all the brothers who are with me*, To the *churches of Galatia*: (ESV)
 
I *want to cover a lot of ground* *very quickly* in this *first section on Authority* before we get to *the message*.
Nevertheless, *don’t pass over the content of the salutation lightly* as though it *contained merely formal niceties such as the “Dear Sir” or “Yours truly” of a modern letter*.
*The prescript of a Pauline letter* by itself *constitutes “an essential part of the letter’s content**.”
(* G. Ebeling, /The Truth of the Gospel: An Exposition of Galatians/ (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984), 8.)  *The salutation reveals* not only *the mood in which Galatians was written* but also *the passion and burden of Paul’s heart that prompted him to write it*.
*What is at stake* is *the content of the gospel *Paul proclaimed to the Galatians.
This too is restated with force in these opening verses as *Paul draws a theological line in the sand* *against the false teachers who have undermined the gospel* by *undermining his apostolic authority* (George, T. (2001, c1994).
/Vol.
30/: /Galatians/ (electronic ed.).
Logos Library System; The New American Commentary (76).
Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.)
Following *the custom of his times*, the apostle *begins his letter* by *stating his name*, *Paul*.
He then *establishes his authority as an apostle*, 1) first on the basis of *his right to the title “apostle,”* 2) second on the basis of *the manner in which he was chosen* for that office, and 3) *third on the basis of his relationship to fellow believers.*
* While we can assert with great certainty that the content of this epistle owes its *structure to Paul*, *the actual mechanics of writing were,* *most likely, that of an amanuensis (secretary),* as evidenced by *the notation made as to what he personally wrote in the final words of the epistle*.
The majority of the epistle was likely generated through the process of *dictation.*.( Elwell, W. A. (1996, c1989).
/Evangelical Commentary on the Bible ./
(electronic ed.) (Ga 1:6).
Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.)
*A)The Title Apostle** (**Galatians 1:1a* )
*Galatians 1:1**a  * [1:1]*Paul, an apostle—(*not from men nor through man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead)
 
*Saul *(*/Paul/* was probably his Roman surname) was *born into a Jewish family* from the tribe of Benjamin.
He was *raised as a strict Pharisee* (Philippians 3:5), grew up in Tarsus, and was *educated under a well-known teacher, Gamaliel* (Acts 22:3).(
Barton, B. B. (1994).
/Galatians/.
Life application Bible commentary (3).
Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale House.)
* Given his *background,* *teaching *and *previous vocatio*n, he was *extremely well aware of the particular challenges* the *Galatians *were *facing from* the *Judaizers * who *advocated an adoption of Jewish ritual acts*.
An *apostle* (“*one who is sent with a commission*”) was *an envoy, ambassador, or messenge*r who was *chosen and trained* *by Jesus Christ* as *His special emissary* *for proclaiming His truth* *during the formative years of the church*.
*In its primary and technical usage,* the term applied *to the original twelve who were chosen at the beginning of Jesus’ earthly ministry* (Mark 3:14; Luke 6:13) and were *set aside to lay the foundation of the early church* and to be the *channels of God’s completed revelation* (Acts 2:42; Eph.
2:20), They were also *given power* to *perform healings* and to *cast out demons* as *verifying signs of their divine authority* (Acts 2:43; 2 Cor.
12:12; Heb.
2:3–4).
It should be noted that, *shortly before Pentecost*, *Judas* was *replaced by Matthias* (Acts 1:26).
*In a wider sense*, the term apostle *is also used of men like Barnabas* (Acts 14:14), *Silas *and *Timothy *(1 Thess.
1:1; 2:6), *and other outstanding leaders* (Rom.
16:7).
Such men are *more specifically called messengers* (/apostoloi/) *of the churches* (see 2 Cor.
8:23; Phil.
2:25), whereas *the Twelve and Paul* were *“apostles* of Jesus Christ.”
*Neither group* was perpetuated.
*Except for Judas *(for obvious reasons), there is *no New Testament record of an apostle in either the primary or secondary group* *being replaced after he died*.
Because *Paul was not among the original twelve*, he *needed to defend his apostleship in ways that they did not.*
Because *one of the qualifications* *was witnessing the risen Christ* (Acts 1:22), *Paul witnessed the resurrected Christ* *in a unique way As he was traveling to **Damascus* (*Acts 9:3–5*).
*Through the godly Anamas of Damascus*, *the Lord declared this former enemy of the gospel to* be “*a chosen instrument of Mine*.(Further
personal appearances of the Lord to Paul are recorded in Acts 18:9; 22:17–21; 23:11; and 2 Corinthians 12:1–4 (cf.1
Cor.
9:1).
B) The Manner in Which He Was *Chosen** *(Galatians 1:1b)
*Galatians 1:1b** *[1:1](Paul, an apostle--)*not from men* *nor through man*, but *through Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead*-- (ESV)
 
Because *false teachers* were *accusing Paul* of being a spurious, *self-appointed apostle* who had *no authority to teach and to rule the churches*, *Paul emphatically stated* that *his was *“not by human *appointment* or human *commission*”.
He was *not (sent) from men*.
He had *not appointed himself* and had *not even been divinely appointed* *through the agency of men** as he says nor through man*.
*No human means of any sort* *was involved in his apostolic commissioning.*
*No human source, no human ceremony, no laying on of hands by any group* in Jerusalem, Antioch, or anywhere else was *involved in his call to apostleship*, though *the elders at Antioch* were *a part of the sending process* of his *special mission* *tour to evangelize* (Acts 13:1–3).
“not by human appointment or human commission”
 
*Paul’s original call to apostleship* was *directly* *through Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised Him from the dead*.
*Jesus called Paul* and *set him apart* *before he had contact with any of the other apostles*.
After *several years of divine preparation* (see Gal.
1:17–18), *he was sent out* to *begin his work among the Gentiles* *directly by the Holy Spirit,* whose divine appointment was *acknowledged by the leaders of the church at Antioch* (Acts 13:2–3).
*Paul’s authority* was *not man-given or self-given* but *God-given*, and *his right to instruct the Galatians* was *grounded in that divine prerogative.*
* Paul certainly had a vastly superior commissioning to any of the *false-teaching, self-appointed Judaizers* who were *confusing the Galatians* and *trying to set themselves above his authority.*
Very early in Galatians we see the mention of *the resurrection*, *without which the gospel would be powerless*.
*The God* who *appointed Paul an apostle* was *God the Father, who raised* *His Son* *from the dead*.
* Apparently, *the Galatians* were *not wholly satisfied with the Savior’s work,* because *they were trying to improve on it* *by adding their own efforts at law-keeping.*
(MacDonald, W., & Farstad, A. (1997, c1995).
/Believer's Bible Commentary : Old and New Testaments/ (Ga 1:1).
Nashville: Thomas Nelson.)
The *apostle’s frequent mention* of *God* and *Father* *in relation to* *Jesus Christ* *throughout the New Testament* marks an emphasis that should not be missed.
*The intent* is *not for us to understand God as /our/ Father* (although that truth is mentioned in 1:4) but *the Father* *in relation to the role He has in the Trinity*, particularly *His relation to the Son*.
The intent is to *emphasize the significance of the relationship between the first and second members of the Trinity as to essential nature*.
The title is to express *equality of deity* between the two, a Father and Son who *share the same nature* (cf.
Matt.
11:27; John 5:17–18, 22; 10:29–33; 14:9; 17:1–5; Rom.
15:6; 2 Cor.
1:3; Eph.
1:3; 1 Pet.
1:3; 2 John 3).
It asserts that *Jesus Christ* is the One who is of the *nature of God* and that the true God is the One who is *the Father* of *Jesus Christ*.
In summary, *Paul says that he is an apostle,* *not /of/ man* (“of has reference *to source*), *neither /by/ man* (“by” has reference *to /agency/*), but *by Jesus Christ and God the Father* (“by” again refers to */agency/.*
*Jesus Christ and God the Father* were not only *the /source/* but also *the /agency/ of Paul’s apostleship*).(
Gingrich, R. E. (2005).
/The Book of Galatians/ (8).
Memphis, TN.: Riverside Printing.)
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9