Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.18UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.16UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.6LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0.36UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.74LIKELY
Extraversion
0.06UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.55LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.82LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Text: Hebrews 9:11-15, 22-28 (ESV) \\ \\
*Illustration: Saved By His “Worse Enemy”* \\ \\
During the Revolutionary War there lived in Pennsylvania a pastor by the name of Peter Miller.
Although the community loved Miller, there was one man, a tavern keeper, named Michael Widman who lived nearby.
Widman hated Miller for his Christian life and testimony.
In fact, this man violently opposed Miller and ridiculed his followers.
Widman was not only a hater of the church, but he was also a vocal Tory (?) and was arrested for treason and sentenced to death.
Instead of celebrating his enemy’s demise, as soon as Miller heard of Widman’s sentence, he set out on foot to visit General Washington who was at Valley Forge.
Miller sought to intercede for Widman’s life.
Washington listened to the minister’s earnest plea, but told him he didn’t feel he should pardon his /friend/.
“My friend!”
Miller cried.
“He is not my friend.
In fact, he’s my worst living enemy.”
“What?” the general exclaimed in surprise.
“You have walked sixty miles to save the life of your enemy?
That, in my judgment, puts the matter in a different light.
I will grant him a pardon for your sake.”
General Washington signed the pardon, and Miller quickly left for the place where his neighbor, his enemy, was to be executed.
He arrived just as Widman was walking to the scaffold.
When the traitor saw Miller, he exclaimed, “Old Peter Miller has come to have his revenge by watching me hang!”
But he was astonished as he watched the minister step out of the crowd and produce the pardon which spared his life.
Peter Miller performed a noble act that day.
Not many of us would think of saving our worst enemy.
Peter Miller did just that.
But as amazing as this was, it does not compare to what God has done for us.
As a result of our sin, mankind is opposed to God.
We are enemies to God.
But rather than letting us “hang” for our sins, God has provided the pardon by which we can be saved, though the his only son, Jesus Christ.
Today’s message is about one of the core doctrines of the Christian faith.
It is one of the most distinguishing beliefs of Christianity.
The doctrine I am talking about is the /Atonement/.
I believe that if we do not get the /Atonement/ right, then we really can’t understand salvation or our need for it.
* *
*Atonement Defined*
 
Let us define what we mean by the word /Atonement/.
It is the act of making man right with God.
Mankind is sinful, meaning, we have offended God.
We probably do not fully understand the nature of our sinful condition?
To borrow a Reformation term, mankind is /Totally Depraved/, which means sin has impacted every aspect of our lives.
This does not mean that we can never do anything right, or that there is no good in man.
But it does mean that the whole of human nature – our thoughts, our emotions, our ability to reason – have been affected by sin.
However, God is holy, totally void of sin.
This means God’s holiness cannot exist with man’s depravity.
Also, divine law requires that sin be punished.
Like the criminal who opposes the law of man, there is a penalty for man’s sinfulness.
But, God is also a loving God and wants to have a relationship with man.
In order for that relationship to exist, man’s sin has to be dealt with.
In the OT, the Hebrew word that is most commonly used for /atonement/ is /kaphar/, which basically means “to cover”.
According to this usage, one was delivered from punishment by placing something between one’s sin and God.
Man would make a sacrifice to “cover” his sin.
God would see the “atoning” sacrifice rather than the sin and the penalty for the sin no longer had to be carried out.
Through the OT sacrificial system, God allowed the guilt of sin to be “covered” by the blood of animals.
The sacrifice became a substitute for the sinner, and bore the sinner’s guilt.
However, man’s sinfulness remained.
In addition to the regular sacrifices throughout the year, one day was also set aside to /atone/ for any deliberate or unintentional sins not yet “covered”.
This day was called the *Day of Atonement* or *Yom Kippur*, as it is referred to today.
This day served as a reminder that the daily, weekly and monthly sacrifices made at the altar were not sufficient to atone for sin.
On this one day, the high priest, as a representative of the people to God, brought atoning blood into the holy of holies within the temple.
The high priest made atonement for “all the iniquities of the children of Israel.”
Atonement was first made for the priests because the mediator between God and his people had to be ceremonially clean.
In addition, the sanctuary was also cleansed, for it, too, was ceremonially defiled by the presence and ministration of sinful men.[2]
All of this may seem strange.
But we read in *Hebrews 9:22*, “Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins.”
In *Leviticus 17:11* we read, “For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls.”
Blood must be shed to atone for sin.
Yet, *Hebrews 10:1* says “the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near.”
So, while the OT sacrifices were indeed mandated and were of some benefit to man, they were not intended to be permanent.
For *Hebrews 10:4* says, “It is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to *take away* sins.”
Something more than “covering” one’s sins is needed.
In fact, when we read the NT, we understand something different concerning what /atonement/ means.
We find that it means “reconciliation”.
In fact, one might say that it signifies not atonement but “AT-ONE-MENT” – making two alienated parties /at one/.[3]
The parties of course are God and man.
Remember, man’s sin keeps him apart from God, yet God wanted to “reconcile” that situation.
\\ \\
*The Problem* \\ \\
There is a problem, though.
There is tension between God’s *love* and God’s *holiness*.
Man is totally depraved and God cannot accept man’s sinful situation.
God holiness demands that the sin be removed.
Yet, God loves us and wants a relationship with us.
We all know what John 3:16 says.
But did you know that it really means…
 
“For God loved the world /in this way/, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.”
The way God loved man and resolved man’s condition was through His son, Jesus.
The love of God and the holiness of God met at the cross.
The cross was the intersection of God’s love and holiness *WITH* man’s sin and punishment.
To put it another way: Perfect Love of God + Absolute Holiness of God + Total Depravity of Man + Requirement of Divine Law = [SUM] Cross of Christ
 
Jesus is the fix for our broken relationship with God.
This is what we find throughout Scripture, and particularly in the passage we read earlier.
Christ has truly resolved the sin problem we have with God.
\\ \\
*Christ the High Priest and Perfect Sacrifice*
 
While the book of Hebrews explains the atonement, it also shows that the old Jewish sacrificial system has now been superseded by the cross of Christ.
This is why the book is concerned with Jewish readers to not lapse back into Judaism, because only the blood of Christ can truly atone for one’s sins.
The OT sacrificial system allowed God to continue with a guilty people because the system typified the cross.[4]
But God did not intend to keep that system.
The passage we read earlier reveals some things about Jesus and the atonement:
 
#.
Christ appeared as high priest (*v11*) – In the OT, the high priest would enter the temple to make sacrifices on behalf of the people.
Christ has done that for us.
He is the high priest who takes our sacrifice to God. \\ \\
#.
Jesus entered “once for all” (*v12*) – In the OT, the high priest would have to continually atone for the sins of the people.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9