Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.17UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.46UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.24UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.57LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.56LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.87LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.85LIKELY
Extraversion
0.25UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.67LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.73LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Wordsearch - TSK (Partial) - Nelson's Book of Maps and Charts (Nothing) - Phillips - Teacher's Commentary - Wiersbe's BE Series - MacArthur - Halley (Nothing) - The Heart of The New Testament - Notes from Steve Brown's tape on chapter three - Wycliffe - Wiersbe's Outlines (Nothing) - McGee - Oliver B. Greene – TBKC – Believer’s Bible Commentary – JFB – The new Bible Commentary – The Bible Reader’s Companion – KJV Bible Commentary – The Nelson Study Bible NKJV – Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Commentary – The teacher’s Commentary – Tyndale Concise Bible Commentary – Wiersbe’s Expository Outlines – Wilmington’s bible Handbook (nothing) – With the Word Bible Commentary -
 
You may recall that on April Fool’s Day, I spoke to you about pulling weeds or getting the weeds out.
Tonight we are going to talk a little bit about planting and watering.
Take your Bibles and turn if you will to 1 Corinthians 3:5-9
 
INTRODUCTION
 
The church at Corinth was fascinating to me and frustrating to the Apostle Paul.
He had laid the foundation of Jesus Christ there in his preaching .
And then another pillar of the faith named Apollos had come along after him.
But the church at Corinth was carnal and one of the demonstrations of their carnality was that they had begun to argue over who was really responsible for the successes the church had seen.
One group said it was Paul
            And one group said it was Apollos
 
And it turns out that both groups were wrong
Someone was responsible for the kingdom growth that had taken place but it was not Paul or Apollos.
Both of these men were merely, /Kingdom Workers/.
Stand with me if you will and let’s read 1 Cor 3.5-9
            Prayer
 
*/1 Corinthians 3:5-9/* says: \\ *1 Corinthians 3:5 - 9 (KJV) *5Who then is Paul, and who /is/ Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?  6I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
7So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
8Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.
9For we are labourers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, /ye are/ God’s building.
The first thing we want to see is…
I.  The Apostle’s Identification
 
            A.
From their supporters view – each other’s view – God’s view
There was disagreement…with each group saying that one was…
 
                        1.
Better than the other
 
And it seems as if they were not only disagreeing but they were disagreeable
 
MR DeHaan said
*We need not all agree, but if we disagree, let us not be disagreeable in our disagreements.*
In other words…
There is no such thing as my converts and your converts.
Paul could not claim any converts and neither could Apollos
* *
*            Like the fellow that came out of the store drunk*
 
The first half of verse 5 is not written to emphasize Paul or Apollos but it is written to emphasize ministers, which is better translated as, /servants/.
And, even though the KJV begins with, “who” it is actually better to read it as, “what.”
What is Paul?
What is Apollos?
And so one group would point to Paul as….
And the other group would point to Apollos as…
                        2.  The “Great” Apostle or Pastor~/Teacher
 
Paul had started a work in Corinth and Apollos had gone there later.
He had added to the work that Paul had done there.
And they had been building God’s church
            Where there should be unity.
But what we discover is that it is possible to be in union with one another without being in unity.
For instance if you tie two cats tails together and throw them over a clothesline, you have a union but you will not have unity -
 
Harry Ironside said about this passage…
 
            “Imagine a household divided over servants!”
So the supporters view was one thing – But…
            B.
From each other’s view
 
                        1.
Servants
 
In the oldest mss.
that we have, Paul lists Apollos before himself.
He did not view their relationship as a competition.
Not only are you and I to be servants - but we are to be servants who complement one another; not servants who compete with one another.
And then, as we will see part of their view of themselves was that they realized that…
Servants are limited in what they can do.
Adding to God’s kingdom requires a miracle.
Neither Paul nor Apollos were capable of producing miracles on their own.
2.
Filling God’s role for them
 
One was called to be an Apsotle and a the other was called to be a pastor~/teacher.
So…it is important to realize that the ministries of both Paul and Apollos were given to them by God
*Ephesians 4:11** (KJV) **11**And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;  *
           
What that means is that they were not the source of their ministry – They were simply the means by which God was going to grow His kingdom.
The were kingdom workers.
Now look at verse six…
Paul didn't try to play down his role
            We need to unapologetically accept the role God has given us.
I */DID/* plant - Apollos */DID/* water */BUT/* God gave the increase!!
And then they viewed themselves as…
                        3.  Laborers together
 
The church was divided over human leaders, but Paul said that was not right.
We are to be united in purpose and heart; as, “Laborers together.”[1]
When we think of one another in these terms – as planters and waterers then it makes it easier to see that we are not in competition with one another.
Think of a garden where it is your job to water and my job to plant.
There is just no place for competition between us because what we both desire is the increase.
So…
Paul saw Apollos as a partner and not a rival.
God just has not made provisions for rivals in His kingdom work.
You and I are partners.
C.
From God’s view
 
Well, whether it is Paul or Apollos or You…
 
You need to understand that…
You have an important role but it ain’t about you.
Verse5 – The Lord gave opportunity
            Verse 6 – God was causing the growth
            Verse 7 – God causes the growth
            Verse 9 – God’s workers – God’s field – God’s building
 
Everybody has a place in the Lord’s harvest, and all are doing His work (John 4:34–38).
There is no room for competing or comparing, as long as there is a need for compassion and sharing.
Don’t worry God sees YOU and will reward YOU but…
 It makes no difference who the servant is so long as Jesus Christ is Lord of the harvest.[2]
II.
The Servant’s Occupation
 
            A.
Planters and waterers
 
Relatively speaking, the sowers and the planters are unimportant.
B.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9