Acts 15:22-35
Heading 1Review:
Heading 1Background:
Heading 1Text:
Background:
Background:
Text:
Text:
The Council’s Letter to Gentile Believers
22 Then it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with the whole church, to choose men from among them and send them to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. They sent Judas called Barsabbas, and Silas, leading men among the brothers, 23 with the following letter: “
he suggests that a letter might come from someone, pretending to be him, saying that ‘the day of the Lord’ had arrived. Don’t believe it, he says. Look at my handwriting, and don’t trust a letter without it
The question of where something had come from, especially an apparently official document or edict, was often a problem in the ancient world.
For many people, this problem was resolved quite simply: a trusted intermediary would carry the letter, and would himself or herself report on the sender’s instructions and vouch for the authenticity of the content. Thus Phoebe is sent to Rome with Paul’s greatest letter; Tychicus, himself originally from Colosse, is sent there with Colossians; and so on.
In the present case, with the official letter from James and the Jerusalem church, there was a pressing need to make sure that the letter got through and was properly heard and understood. We know from Galatians that people had been spreading rumours about Paul—that he was really a junior to the Jerusalem apostles, that he had muddled up the message he should have been preaching, that he normally taught that people should be circumcised but had simply missed out that bit of the message when he was in Galatia, and so on. That’s why, in that letter, Paul has to spend such a long time explaining his personal movements and his meetings with the Jerusalem apostles, somewhat as Peter in Acts 11 had to give a blow-by-blow account of his visit to Cornelius.
15:22 Silas Silas is mentioned here for the first time; he will accompany Paul on his later travels (Acts 15:40; 2 Cor 1:19; 1 Thess 1:1; 2 Thess 1:1).
The brothers, both the apostles and the elders, to the brothers who are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia, greetings. 24 Since we have heard that some persons have gone out from us and troubled you with words, unsettling your minds, although we gave them no instructions, 25 it has seemed good to us, having come to one accord, to choose men and send them to you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, 26 men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 27 We have therefore sent Judas and Silas, who themselves will tell you the same things by word of mouth. 28 For it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay on you no greater burden than these requirements: 29 that you abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from what has been strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well. Farewell.”
The document is very clear that Paul and Barnabas, so far from being seen in Jerusalem as trouble-makers, are very much persona grata. They are ‘beloved’, and they have risked their lives for the name of Jesus. They are not, in other words, to be marginalized or regarded as holding unorthodox opinions. In any case, the opening greeting demonstrates how matters stand. The Gentile believers in Antioch and the surrounding districts are ‘brothers and sisters’, members (in other words) of the same family as James and the others, even though they have not been circumcised. This already concedes the substantial point at issue. And then comes the disclaimer: the people who went to Antioch from Jerusalem may have come ‘from us’ in the sense that they were part of the Jerusalem church, but we did not send them or commission them to say what they said to you.
This “necessity” was not a matter of salvation but only for fellowship between Jews and Gentiles. The Judaizers made the law of Moses essential to salvation
30 So when they were sent off, they went down to Antioch, and having gathered the congregation together, they delivered the letter. 31 And when they had read it, they rejoiced because of its encouragement. 32 And Judas and Silas, who were themselves prophets, encouraged and strengthened the brothers with many words. 33 And after they had spent some time, they were sent off in peace by the brothers to those who had sent them. 35 But Paul and Barnabas remained in Antioch, teaching and preaching the word of the Lord, with many others also.
One final note. Those with sharp eyes will have spotted that there is no ‘verse 34’. The earliest and best manuscripts of the New Testament have the text as we now see it. But there is a puzzle. Luke says (verse 33) that Judas and Silas returned to Jerusalem; but a few verses later (verse 40) Paul chooses Silas as his new companion. So did Silas go back to Jerusalem, or did he stay in Antioch? There is of course no necessary contradiction. Paul was quite capable of sending a message to call Silas back. But at some point at least two scribes, independently, decided to tidy things up, and wrote various things to the effect that Judas only returned to Jerusalem while Silas remained in Antioch. When the New Testament verse-numbering was done, this additional material was still in the text people were using, and was called verse 34. All contemporary translations now omit it.