Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.6LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.51LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.63LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.81LIKELY
Extraversion
0.04UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.32UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.65LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Pray
Pray
Introduction
So Adam has given me another opportunity to preach for which I am thankful.
I wanted to preach something that would compliment our current study through the book of Romans.
At the same time I had remembered that had been on my mind.
What better way to compliment Paul’s letter to the Romans than teaching about the Old Testament Law.
In order to understand Paul correctly one must have a correct understanding of the Law.
Because what is one of the topics of Paul’s epistle to the Romans?
Our relationship to the Law.
Now superficially Deuteronomy, and the Law, seem like a list of do’s and don'ts however, it is much more than that.
As we take a closer look, I hope we can see a bit more than a harsh strict law and possibly understand the New Testament in light of the Old.
Background
Deuteronomy is the last book of the Pentateuch, the first five books of the OT.
And it’s name is derived from the Greek word meaning “second law”.
However this is a misleading name since Deuteronomy is not a second giving of or a repetition of the law already given in Exodus and Leviticus.
Rather it is a series of sermons given by Moses, who is also the author, to the people of Israel before entering the promised land concerning the Law.
Author: Moses
So let us begin reading.
Date: 15th to 13th Century B.C.
Providence:
Genre
So let us begin reading.
(ESV)
14 “You are the sons of the Lord your God.
You shall not cut yourselves or make any baldness on your foreheads for the dead. 2 For you are a people holy to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for his treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.
Looking at v.2 we see some of the reasons God has laid out His Law specifically to the Israelites.
Because Israel is a holy people to the Lord
Because Israel is a chosen people by God
Because Israel is a treasured people of God
We need to keep this in mind whenever we read the Law.
The Law was not given to be a burden, or a bad gift.
A good God never gives bad gifts.
tells us this, “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change.”
The Law was given to a people who God demanded to be holy because they were chosen to be treasured.
So when we read v.1 we can grasp a bit more of the context.
Shaving one’s head for the dead was a pagan practice.
Having a shaved head or honoring the dead was not the problem.
Being a participant in pagan practices was.
V.3-20 are dietary laws regarding clean and unclean food.
I will break them up into their respective sections for this sermon.
But before that here we must realize there is a difference between what we think of clean and what the text means by clean.
When we think of cleanliness we think of good hygiene or of something being free of debris and sterile.
That is not strictly so in the OT.
There are indeed OT laws regarding biological fluids, bathing, and touching the dead but that was not the main point.
Cleanliness in the OT refers to ritual purity.
That is, one must be made clean/pure before approaching God.
God is clean, pure, and holy therefore one should be the same before approaching.
So let us now pick up in v.3.
3 “You shall not eat any abomination.
4 These are the animals you may eat: the ox, the sheep, the goat, 5 the deer, the gazelle, the roebuck, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope, and the mountain sheep.
6 Every animal that parts the hoof and has the hoof cloven in two and chews the cud, among the animals, you may eat.
7 Yet of those that chew the cud or have the hoof cloven you shall not eat these: the camel, the hare, and the rock badger, because they chew the cud but do not part the hoof, are unclean for you.
8 And the pig, because it parts the hoof but does not chew the cud, is unclean for you.
Their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcasses you shall not touch.
Now what do we notice here?
For an animal to be considered clean, it have to meet two requirements.
It has to “chew the cud” and have “hoof cloven in two”.
As someone who did not grow up on a farm I have to ask the question, what is a “hoof cloven in two” and “chewing the cud”?
HOOF CLOVEN IN TWO: It is when the feet of an animal is split into two toes, such as a deer.
CHEWING THE CUD: It is when an animal regurgitates food to again chew it in order to digest it.
The best example of this are cows or pigs.
Also in this section we are given examples of what are acceptable and unacceptable.
V.9 through v.10 are about seafood.
Let us read.
9 “Of all that are in the waters you may eat these: whatever has fins and scales you may eat. 10 And whatever does not have fins and scales you shall not eat; it is unclean for you.
So again we have the same formula.
In order for a food item to be clean, it must meet two requirements; fins and scales.
So in other words, no catfish or craw-fish.
Also note that we are not given any examples this time around.
Now onto the birds.
11 “You may eat all clean birds.
12 But these are the ones that you shall not eat: the eagle, the bearded vulture, the black vulture, 13 the kite, the falcon of any kind; 14 every raven of any kind; 15 the ostrich, the nighthawk, the seagull, the hawk of any kind; 16 the little owl and the short-eared owl, the barn owl 17 and the tawny owl, the carrion vulture and the cormorant, 18 the stork, the heron of any kind; the hoopoe and the bat.
Interestingly this time we do not get a formula but rather just a list.
I guess what was clean and unclean could not be so easily be divided as in the other instances.
Rather we are simply given a list of unacceptable birds.
And finally, v.19 and v.20.
19 And all winged insects are unclean for you; they shall not be eaten.
20 All clean winged things you may eat.
This seems a bit confusing but it makes sense in light of .
We will not be reading that for the sake of time and the fact my intentions are not to make you have an kosher diet.
But just as a note, some insects were clean and to be eaten of.
But that is what the cleanliness and purity laws were for.
The cleanliness/purity laws were for specific purposes.
God is a perfectly clean, pure, and holy God.
God demands those who follow Him to be like Him.
You are not.
Everyone from the high priest to the trash-man are unclean and have to be made clean.
Let us continue reading.
21 “You shall not eat anything that has died naturally.
You may give it to the sojourner who is within your towns, that he may eat it, or you may sell it to a foreigner.
For you are a people holy to the Lord your God.
“You shall not boil a young goat in its mother's milk.
To me this is the second most interesting part of the text we are studying today.
The first part makes sense hygienically but not so much the last phrase.
And why is it permitted to sell something unclean to a foreigner?
Let us now discuss all of that.
Q: Why not eat something that has died naturally?
A: The hygenic argument makes sense here but I would argue that such a
A: The hygienic argument makes sense here but I would argue that such a view is incomplete.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9