Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.06UNLIKELY
Fear
0.58LIKELY
Joy
0.13UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.58LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.92LIKELY
Confident
0.62LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.35UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.02UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.04UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.51LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Premise—v.
12 and v. 20
Logical conclusion: 1) Premise, v. 12—conclusions, vv.
13-19; 2) Premise v. 20—conclusions, vv.
21-28
First fruits
• The first sheath represented the whole crop
• It consecrated the whole crop
• It anticipated the whole crop
• It guaranteed the whole crop
I Corinthians 15—first fruits becomes personal
• The first sheath is the resurrection of Christ
• The crop is all dead believers
• Christ’s resurrection guarantees our resurrection
The advantages of the resurrection—vv.
29-34
• The implications of the denial of the resurrection: 1) “Baptized for the dead”—new believers take the place of dead ones, v. 29
• Of those who suffer, vv.
30-32
• If there is no resurrection of the body, then what suffering is worth it??
Three levels of fellowship
• The fellowship we have now on earth
• The fellowship at death
• The fellowship with the Lord in the new body and soul and spirit
Obligation imposed by the doctrine of the resurrection, vv.
33-34
• Danger of association (not in terms of conduct but rather belief--doctrine), v. 33
• Duty to change, v. 34: 1) In terms of sobriety; 2) In terms of sinning (in particular bad company); 3) Description of bad company
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9