Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.05UNLIKELY
Joy
0.64LIKELY
Sadness
0.12UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.82LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.44UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.7LIKELY
Extraversion
0.53LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.27UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.78LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
• As demanded by creation
• As demanded by angels
Clarification—vv.
11-16
• Men and women should glory in their own uniqueness, vv.
11-12
• Paul considered the connotations of the culture in which he lived, v. 13
• “Long hair”—this is obviously relative, vv.
13-14: 1) Could be relative to women; 2) The issue is not how long
• Probably the best statement as to what the covering is—v.
15
• Perspective—v.
16—this is not doctrine it is “custom”
The Lord’s Supper—11:17-34
Revolves about three themes
• The problem of mockery at the Lord’s Table—vv.
17-22: 1) In general; 2) Specifically
• A review of the significance of the Lord’s Table—vv.
23-26
• Warning about partaking of the Lord’s Table—vv.
27-34
The Corinthian practice included the agape feast
• View in light of the Matthew 26:20-28 account
• “While” (v, 26)—he institutes the Lord’s Table
• Paul is dealing with the love feast issue in vv.
17-22
• The purpose of the love feast was to be an equalizer
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9