Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.02UNLIKELY
Disgust
0UNLIKELY
Fear
0UNLIKELY
Joy
0.41UNLIKELY
Sadness
0UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.88LIKELY
Confident
0.56LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.96LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.15UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.26UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.07UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.44UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Preamble of hope--1:4-9, the presence of carnality among the Corinthians does not distort Paul's appreciation of the good because he learned to view believers by their position
A believer may be viewed from any of three standpoints
• His position in Christ
• His present life
• His ultimate destiny
Carnality/Flesh
• Weakness
• Sinfulness
• Transitoriness
*The flesh is the part of the Christian that is the seat of sinful desire
The problem of and solution to dissension--1:10-4:21
• The problem stated--v.
10:
1) The appeal--"I beseech": a) Encouragement is the idea involved b) He wants them to see the issue for themselves
2) The motivation: a) The name of the Lord Jesus Christ
3) The details a) Positive standpoint: Unity is to be achieved by doctrinal agreement-- NOT compromise
b) Negative standpoint
1) No divisions--"schisms"
2) No differing opinions
• The carnality defined--vv.
11-12
1) In general--"contentions"
a) Bitter discussions is the idea
b) The source of the sin nature
2) In particular--(involved ego)--v.
12
a) Involved everyone
b) Centered in personalities--this is the idea with the names
c) Involved ego--the personal pronoun "I" is actually the Greek word "ego"--and it is emphatic in each case
d) It did not involve belief--the issue is not doctrinal differences
*The idea behind the names is not that these were the actual factions--they are figurative for the factions that were being developed
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9