Faithlife Sermons

Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.44UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.43UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.82LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.71LIKELY
Extraversion
0.27UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.75LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*Introduction:* 
*Slide 1 “Title”*
·         There’s a song made famous by Ray Stevens that tells the story of a widow who remarried and later her grown daughter married her new husband’s father.
Then each couple had a child.
The lyrics tell us:
o    This made my dad my son-in-law
o    My daughter was my mother, cause she was my father’s wife
o    Father’s wife then had a son
o    He became my grandchild, for he was my daughter’s son
o    My wife is now my mother’s mother
o    Now if my wife is my grandmother
o    Then I’m her grandchild
o    As husband of my grandmother
o    I’m my own grandpa
·         The research of genealogies has become a very popular pastime if not passion for many people.
o    I know that Lynn has roots that run to General Custer and Geronimo
o    It’s caused an inner tension in her family that manifests when we play Pictionary and they can’t decided which side to be on.
o    I think that’s part of the draw in researching genealogy: is there some one of infamy or notoriety in our family tree.
o    I met a fellow Harris who told me the Harris clans (at least those from Wales in Britain) come from a clan of pirates.
·         So, as the New Testament begins, in the very first gospel the writer, Matthew, lays out the genealogy of Jesus.
o    My guess is most of us skip the first 15 verses of chapter 1 if we’re reading through Matthew.
o    It might be better if the names were like Tim, George, Bill, Susie, and Ed.
o    But we have names like Zerubbabel and Eliakim and Salathiel.
o    It’s the passage we dread being asked to read out loud in a bible study group.
o    With all the noisy names and dry lists of lineage it’s tough for 21st century minds to see beyond the initial black and white list; they’re just necessary evils.
·         Matthew was writing to a Jewish audience so he was writing from a Jewish perspective.
o    Genealogy was very important to the Jew.
o    Your genealogy told you who your people were, what tribe they came from, and most importantly if you were 100% Jewish – were you a part of the Promised People.
o    So they kept very tight family trees.
·         I see the genealogies like a Bev Dolittle painting.
·         *Slide 2 “Painting”*
o    At first you see a nice painting with an obvious scene in the first layer.
o    But as you look closer at the painting, new images arise that begin to bring out new elements of the paintings story.
o    We’ve already established that Jews placed a high value on genealogy; family history was important, much more so than it is in our culture.
o    They also knew that the Messiah would come from King David’s line.
o    Matthew showed the Jewish audience that Jesus had royal blood in His veins.
§  If you can’t prove you’re royalty by your lineage, then you aren’t royalty.
o    While the first seventeen verses of Matthew seem dry and foreign to us, it established the validity of what was to follow in the rest of the gospel.
§  Without the genealogy, Jesus was just one of many other “messiahs” of the time.
o    In the genealogy of Jesus we not only see the lineage that connects Jesus to the line of King David, (the needed proof of authenticity for the Jewish mind) we see a picture of God working in the midst of a fallen people like you and me.
o    Because frankly, the family tree of Jesus was highly dysfunctional.
*Slide 3 “Title”*
·         *God is not dysfunctional… people are dysfunctional.*
o    Nothing is haphazard with God; even the Son of God’s family tree.
o    God knew what He was doing; He understood the ramifications of every event and circumstance.
o    It was the same with the family tree of His Son.
o    It flows through 28 generations and around 1700 years.
o    Even women are mentioned in His family tree – not seen in OT genealogies.
o    The family tree is divided into three divisions of fourteen.
§  Three was considered the divine number of perfection and fullness.
§  Seven or any multiple of seven (fourteen) symbolized perfection.
o    Matthew was showing that God was in control and God’s perfect plan lead to Jesus.
o    The incarnation of Jesus, God in the flesh, wasn’t a last minute idea.
§  God had been working the plan throughout history.
§  The appearance of Jesus on earth was the culmination of a divinely inspired plan to make life available to His creation.
·         *The faces on the tree…*
o    Reading the genealogy of Jesus is like looking at a family album.
o    Looking at the faces in the album brings back good and sometimes not so good memories associated with people.
o    Now, in our humanness we’d expect God’s family album, the family album of Jesus, to be filled with people who lived stellar lives; this is the family of the Son of God were talking about.
o    But, just like looking at a Bev Dolittle painting, when we look closer we see all kinds of different pictures emerging.
o    There are skeletons in God’s family closet.
o    Let me give you some examples:
 
*Slide 4 “Abraham…”*
§  Abraham said that his wife was his sister, twice, so that he wouldn’t have to fight for her; Abraham the coward and liar.
*Slide 5 “Isaac…”*
§  Isaac did the same thing, and got caught snuggling up to her.
*Slide 6 “Jacob…”*
§  Jacob lied to his father, cheated his brother and ripped off his father-in-law.
*Slide 7 “Rahab…”*
§  Rahab was a woman (unusual in OT genealogies) and a prostitute.
*Slide 8 “Ruth…”*
§  Ruth was a gentile from a despised country.
*Slide 9 “Solomon…”*
§  Solomon allowed his wives… and he had a bunch… to worship false gods.
*Slide 10 “Rehoboam…”*
§  Rehoboam split the nation of Israel in two.
*Slide 11 “Many kings…”*
§  Many of the kings in Jesus’ line were not good men.
·         They often worshipped false gods.
·         They could be tyrants.
·         They did many cruel things.
·         King Manasseh even sacrificed his own son to an idol.
*Slide 12 “Two notable…”*
o    Two notable examples of dysfunction:
*Slide 13 “Judah and Tamar…”*
§  Judah and Tamar:  Genesis 38
*Slide 14 “King David…”*
§  King David:
*Slide 15 “Title”*
o    God wasn’t working through a story book, He was working in the nitty-gritty, fallen, ugly, sometimes faithful, lives of people like you and me.
o    Redeemable, but full of flaws.
§  The one common characteristic among everyone in the lineage of Jesus was their incredible propensity to be down-right human and down-right sinful.
§  Some of you may be thinking, “And I thought /my/ family was bad!”
§  Jesus had royal blood in Him, but He also had the blood of murderers, cheats, liars, prostitutes, pagans and swindlers as well.
§  Yet Jesus Himself was without sin… that power!
§  And it was through this blood-line that God’s plan to bring us into new life flowed.
*Slide 16 “God can…”*
§  God can take the unlikeliest people and messed up situations, turn them upside down and use them for His purposes… in fact evidence would suggest He prefers this method – actually there is no other alternative.
*Slide 17 “While God…”*
·         *While God uses us in our dysfunction, He never celebrates our sin.*
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9