Cessationism

Kingdom and Power  •  Sermon  •  Submitted   •  Presented   •  57:36
0 ratings
· 257 views
Files
Notes
Transcript
Sermon Tone Analysis
A
D
F
J
S
Emotion
A
C
T
Language
O
C
E
A
E
Social
View more →

Supernatural Gifts in Post-Biblical Church

If there is evidence of supernatural gifts in the post-biblical church we need to see them, and if one of the primary arguments of the cessationist position is found to be fraudulent; we should approach this topic in a Presbyterian Church
1 Corinthians 12–14 ESV
Now concerning spiritual gifts, brothers, I do not want you to be uninformed. You know that when you were pagans you were led astray to mute idols, however you were led. Therefore I want you to understand that no one speaking in the Spirit of God ever says “Jesus is accursed!” and no one can say “Jesus is Lord” except in the Holy Spirit. Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. For to one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills. For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ. For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit. For the body does not consist of one member but of many. If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. If the whole body were an eye, where would be the sense of hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell? But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose. If all were a single member, where would the body be? As it is, there are many parts, yet one body. The eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you,” nor again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.” On the contrary, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, and on those parts of the body that we think less honorable we bestow the greater honor, and our unpresentable parts are treated with greater modesty, which our more presentable parts do not require. But God has so composed the body, giving greater honor to the part that lacked it, that there may be no division in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together. Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it. And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? Do all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? But earnestly desire the higher gifts. And I will show you a still more excellent way. If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing. Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known. So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love. Pursue love, and earnestly desire the spiritual gifts, especially that you may prophesy. For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit. On the other hand, the one who prophesies speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation. The one who speaks in a tongue builds up himself, but the one who prophesies builds up the church. Now I want you all to speak in tongues, but even more to prophesy. The one who prophesies is greater than the one who speaks in tongues, unless someone interprets, so that the church may be built up. Now, brothers, if I come to you speaking in tongues, how will I benefit you unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or teaching? If even lifeless instruments, such as the flute or the harp, do not give distinct notes, how will anyone know what is played? And if the bugle gives an indistinct sound, who will get ready for battle? So with yourselves, if with your tongue you utter speech that is not intelligible, how will anyone know what is said? For you will be speaking into the air. There are doubtless many different languages in the world, and none is without meaning, but if I do not know the meaning of the language, I will be a foreigner to the speaker and the speaker a foreigner to me. So with yourselves, since you are eager for manifestations of the Spirit, strive to excel in building up the church. Therefore, one who speaks in a tongue should pray that he may interpret. For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays but my mind is unfruitful. What am I to do? I will pray with my spirit, but I will pray with my mind also; I will sing praise with my spirit, but I will sing with my mind also. Otherwise, if you give thanks with your spirit, how can anyone in the position of an outsider say “Amen” to your thanksgiving when he does not know what you are saying? For you may be giving thanks well enough, but the other person is not being built up. I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you. Nevertheless, in church I would rather speak five words with my mind in order to instruct others, than ten thousand words in a tongue. Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature. In the Law it is written, “By people of strange tongues and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people, and even then they will not listen to me, says the Lord.” Thus tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers. If, therefore, the whole church comes together and all speak in tongues, and outsiders or unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are out of your minds? But if all prophesy, and an unbeliever or outsider enters, he is convicted by all, he is called to account by all, the secrets of his heart are disclosed, and so, falling on his face, he will worship God and declare that God is really among you. What then, brothers? When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation. Let all things be done for building up. If any speak in a tongue, let there be only two or at most three, and each in turn, and let someone interpret. But if there is no one to interpret, let each of them keep silent in church and speak to himself and to God. Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said. If a revelation is made to another sitting there, let the first be silent. For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged, and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church. Or was it from you that the word of God came? Or are you the only ones it has reached? If anyone thinks that he is a prophet, or spiritual, he should acknowledge that the things I am writing to you are a command of the Lord. If anyone does not recognize this, he is not recognized. So, my brothers, earnestly desire to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues. But all things should be done decently and in order.

Define Protestant Cessationism

This position is a reactive one to the abuses of the Roman Catholic Church prior to and through the Reformation; especially confusing since they stressed Sola Scriptura .... we will examine during a later study… Luther, for example, rightly was worried about those who gave greater credence to the internal voice than to the Revealed Word.
People in history like Warfield (d. 1921) was antagonistic to those who felt the Lord spoke to them. and voices like this are still with us ....This claim from MacArthur “The Church Fathers, who came almost entirely from the East, believed that the apostolic gifts had ceased.” This is simply not true.
Many just right off the fringe groups, but some of the groups they write off are still with us - like the Methodist, and the Charismatic movement The RCC and the Eastern Church.
Protestant Cessationist have worshipped at the altar of the enlightenment and deny the validity of anything not rational. the result is deism and not faith the Living Christ. Pentecostals haven’t helped in their explanations , which are odd.
But if the position holds water there will be no evidence after the apostolic age; and if there are recorded histories than this position is refuted on its face. I have chosen four people (2 from eastern church and 2 from the western), during the first six centuries of the Christian era to illustrate the continuation of the gifts.

Spirit-Empowered Ministry in the Post-Apostolic Church

It is clear that the Holy Spirit’s activity in the Christian Church did not change dramatically after A.D. 100. There is a ebb and flow of the manifestation of the Holy Spirit, but prophets continued to function in the 2nd century, and beyond. While some church fathers (like Origen, who some consider a heretic) are reported to have claimed the gifts stopped they did not but is so, well, this if so question will show up later. Hagiography points to a continuation throughout the Middle Ages, and the Bollandists have cleaned up the list. They detail an evangelistic outreach empowered by gifts of the Spirit. To insist that non of these accounts are credible, while at the same time assuming that similar stories from the 1st century church are credible, suggests that we are not letting the data speak, but imposing our own views on it regardless of what it says.

Gregory Thaumaturgus (wonder-worker) (213-270).

Gregory was born about 213 at Neocaesarea (in Asia Minor, presently Turkey), the son of wealthy, noble parents. His father was devoted to the worship of pagan deities. When Gregory was 14 years old, his father died and Gregory became a student of the famous Alexandrian theologian, Origen, under whose tutelage he became a devout Christian (side bar — notice that a pagan chose to study with Origen).
Origen probed his student with questions and taught him to think critically, investigating philosophy, physics, and ethics. Gregory later praised Origen as one who mediated him through divine charisma, speaking as those who prophesy and interpret mystical and divine words.
Following his education, (230?) he returned to to his native Neocaesarea, where according to his follower, Gregory of Nyssa, there were only 17 Christians. When Gregory the Wonder-worker died forty years later, there were only 17 who were not Christians.
How was this mass conversion accomplished? As least four of the Church Fathers speak to this question. One of Gregory’s spiritual descendants was Basil of Cappadocia. In this famous work, On the Holy Spirit, he argues that Gregory should be placed among the apostles and prophets as a person who walked by the same Spirit as they. Specifically, Basil reports that by the “fellow-working of the Spirit” Gregory has tremendous power over demons, and was so spiritually gifted that his evangelism was dramatically successful. Basil list a few of the miracles created to Gregory’s ministry (including prophecy and the turning of the of the course of rivers). He concludes:

by the superabundance of gifts, wrought in him by the Spirit in all power and in signs and in marvels, we was styled a second Moses by the very enemies of the Church. Thus in all that he through grace accomplished, alike by word and deed, a light seemed seemed to be ever shining, token of the heavenly power from the unseen which followed him.

Gregory of Nyssa, another of the the Wonder-workers followers, wrote an essay of his predecessor, which seeks to explain the evangelistic success of the Wonder-worker. Through-out it is assumed that miracles and other other supernatural phenomena resulted in mass conversions.
In this history of the early church, the fourth century historian, Socrates, reports that pagans were no less attracted to the Christian faith by his marvelous acts, than by his words. He reports many miracles, healing of the sick, and the casting out of devils even by means of his letters.
Jerome, who provides us with the earliest extant list of “Who’s Who in the Church,” tells of reports current in the fourth and fifth centuries that Gregory’s writings were overshadowed by the “signs and wonders” which accompanied his evangelism, bringing great glory to the churches.
Curiously, the greatest Church historian of the period, Eusebius, is silent on matters miraculous in Gregory’s ministry. This silence has been seized upon by modern “demythologizers” to suggest that they were merely figments of the Wonder-workers disciples imagination. But arguments based on silence are valueless. The same scholars argue that Gregory’s philosophical and reflective tendency’s would be incompatible with a ministry that evidenced “power evangelism.” One can only wonder how, using this reasoning, they can so readily accept the same mix in the life of Saint Paul (see Acts 17: 28 and Romans 15: 18-19.)

Basil of Cappadocia (ca. 330-379): The Spirit and Social Concerns

Of all the Early Church Fathers, no one is more concerned about the things of the Spirit that Basil of Cappadocia. His writing On the Holy Spirit may be the greatest of all such works ever produced in the Christian Church. He lived in the same section of Asia Minor as Gregory the Wonder-worker. This is not at all surprising because Gregory’s influence is directly referenced in Basil’s writings on the Spirit.
Basil understood that the vibrant (living and true) Christian was a “pneumatophor” - an active receptacle and distributor of the Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts. He is remembered first for providing Eastern Christianity with its most articulate and powerful description of the person and offices of the divine third person of the Trinity. Basil is also remembered for establishing the monastic rule which is used by monks of the Eastern Church. One of the unique aspects of Basil’s concept of the Church is that it is a charismatic boy, each person exercising unique and separate gifts, without which the community as a whole is impoverished. Basil expected those who exercised leadership and care must be spiritual seniors who have gifts of discernment of spirits and healing the sick. They must also have prophetic giftings: Acts 11: 27-28; Acts 20:22; Acts 21: 10-11.
One of the charismata Basil encouraged was empowered Christian preaching. He also stressed the gift of teaching. Basil tended to rely heavily on the leadership of those having obvious spiritual endowment. As a bishop, he would, on occasion, give leadership responsibilities to a lesser monk or lay brother who was gifted spiritually.
Perhaps the most impressive aspect of Basil’s charismatic life and outreach was the combining of preaching and teaching with caring. He created an entire community, called Basilead, to deal with social needs, including those of widows, orphans, lepers, the poor, and even travelers. In the process, he guided others into the role of pneumatophore - those led of the spirit to give of themselves, rather than be self-seeking.

Augustine of Hippo (354-430): Miracles accompanying sermons

Without a doubt, Augustine stands as the most influential Church Father in the West. He is responsible for crystallizing much of Western theology, including the traditional Western view of the Holy Spirit’s person and work.
What most theologians and church historians do not recognize in Augustine is the dynamic of this ministry and his recognition of the place of the miraculous in successful ministry. Although he was skeptical of the spiritual gifts in his early career, by the time he wrote the City of God (413-426), miracles were a part of his own experience. In this work he reports, “Even now … many miracles are wrought, the same God who wrought those we read of still performing them, by whom He will and as He will....” Again, he declares, “We cannot listen to those who maintain that the invisible God works no visible miracles … God, who made the visible heaven and earth, does not disdain to work visible miracles in heaven or earth, that he may thereby awaken the soul which is immersed in things visible to worship Him, the invisible.”
Augustine gives several examples, including a Cappadocian brother and sister, Paulus and Palladia, who were widely known for their horrible cases of palsy. They wandered into Hippo one spring, and attended church, where they were prayed for. On Easter morning, when the largest crowd of the year had gathered, Paulus was praying in the church, when suddenly his shaking ceased. Those around recognized what had happened, and soon the whole church was filled with the voices of those who were shouting praises to God. Augustine then ministered to the people, mediating the eloquence of God’s work among them.
At the end of the service, there were more shouts, for the palsied sister, Palladia, who had been trembling at the back of the church, suddenly found herself totally healed. At this point, Augustine reports,

“Such a shout of wonder rose from men and women together, that the exclamations and the tears seemed like to never have come to an end … they shouted God’s praises without words, but with such a noise that ears could scarcely bear it.”

Augustine had a practice of requiring all who had experienced miracles to make both oral and written testimony, so that those who had heard would not forget, and those who had never heard would be aware of God’s power. He also took his own advice by reporting a variety of contemporary miracles.
Whenever a miracles occured, Augustine’s practice was to mediate the event to the people. This was so that they would understand completely what had happened, so they would not forget, and so that God would receive the glory, not the priest.
Augustine insists that true gifts will bear examination. He even suggests a test to determine whether the spirit is of God.... see if there is charity there. Furthermore, Augustine warns against the notion that a spiritual work must be accompanied by external proof: “God forbid that our heart should be tempted by this faithfulness.”
Strangely, especially in light of the above, Augustine does deny that the gift of tongues is for this generation (5x) ...

“In the laying on of hands, now that persons may receive the Holy Ghost, do we look, that they should speak with tongues? When we laid the hand on these infants, did each one of you look to see whether they would speak with tongues,, and, when he saw that they did not speak with tongues, was any of you so wrong minded as to say, ‘these have not recieved the Holy Ghost’? Tongues are no longer needed because the church speaks in the tongues of all nations.”

This is a problem for our believers baptisms brethren since he is referring to infants … and has the early references.. IT is also very significant that he uses infants who do not speak at all for his evidence and not scripture.

Gregory the Great (540? - 604): Recorder of Contemporary miracles

Gregory the Great, the fourth and last of the traditional Latin “Doctors of the Church, “ became Pope in 590. His Four Books of Dialogues on the Life and Miracles of the Italian Fathers and on the Immortality of Souls (593-594) simplified the doctrines expressed in Augustine’s City of God and was highly influential during the Middle Ages. This work was was composed for the single purpose of recording miracles performed by Italian saints in his own time. He understood that miracles were necessary in the Early Church to accomplish the work of evangelism. So, too, they were necessary in his own time for the conversion of pagans and heretics. They also were intended to deepen the faith of those who were already baptized Christians. While Gregory admits that miracles, with the exception of visions, were not as frequent as they had been in the first century, he believes is a result of a devolution of faith as the numbers increased. Nevertheless, miracles were considered normative for the faith.
To remove any reason for disbelief on the part of his readers, Gregory declares that he will give the authority in which each of his miracles stories is based, By and large, he is faithful in this promise, and his sources are all either eyewitnesses or members of the immediate entourage of the saints involved in the miracles. Only 19 of 200 reported have no source given, and most of these have an explanation. Gregory also connects the stories to the Revealed Word of God. Among the miracles reported are: healings, raising the dead to life, exorcisms, prophecy and foretelling, and deliverance from danger. A good example is

Benedict of Nursia

Gregory’s sources here are four of Benedict’s disciples. Benedict brought deliverance to a young monk who had been crushed by a collapsing wall. He also brought healing to numerous illnesses, including leprosy, and raised the dead back to life. He manifested a spirit of prophesy and told others what they had done when he was not there. He was able to know unspoken thoughts of some of the monks. And he was warned of poison placed in his drinking water. He discerned the work of evil spirits and exorcised many of such spirits. Gregory asserts that such gifts are directly from the Spirit of God.

No personal Evidence

Gregory the Great’s own ministry apparently was not graced with these gifts, but the fact that his works remain in the volume they do is a miracle in itself. He does report that he was healed from an illness that put him near death. He was unable to serve during Eastertide and asked Abbot Eleutherius of Spoleto to pray for him. No sooner than the Amen was spoken then he found strength to serve through Easter.
His writings are filled with the miraculous .. generally we see holy men do wonderful things, perform many miracles, cleanse lepers, cast out demons, heal people by touch, predict things to come by prophecy.... He reports that Augustine of Canterbury and his companions on missionary work.. had such miracles accompany them that they seemed to imitate the apostles. Their preaching was anointed and the miracles helped convert the Anglo-Saxons.

Other examples

Tertullian

Attempted to prove validity of his teaching against heretics by evidence of the power of God working in his ministry; whereas the heretics had no evidence of power in their philosophy

Martin of Tours (ca. 316)

His power was claimed by Sulpicius Severus to be not only equal to the Apostles but close that of Christ

Antony of the Desert

Power in prayer and activity..Athanasius provides biography … power in prayer, exorcism, teaching

Pseudo-Macarius of Egypt (4th)

several sources — healing, exorcism, future

Desert Fathers

Historia Monachorum in Aegypto

Bollandists

these are hagiographies and they have been vetted by now.. this was believed in Middle ages and understood to be a reason for church growth.....
Related Media
See more
Related Sermons
See more