Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.64LIKELY
Sadness
0.23UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.79LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.29UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.85LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.78LIKELY
Extraversion
0.32UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.83LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Good morning and welcome to Dishman Baptist Church.
I want to start off this morning with an observation and a question.
The observation is that sometimes we really aren’t that nice to one another.
Oh we mean to be and often we even go out of our way to not say things so that we are being nice.
We try to subscribe to that old momism “if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.”
But sometimes we just can’t help it, we let our tongues get away from us and we say things that maybe shouldn’t have been said.
And if the Bible is correct and the words that come out of us are a byproduct of our heart’s condition and our heart condition affects both our words and our thoughts then the question must be asked - what do you think of or how do you think of those who are your brothers and sisters in Christ?
As we read this morning’s passage - ask yourself this question “Do I ever think or talk about my fellow Christian brothers and sisters like this?”
Please open your Bibles and turn with me to Colossians 4 and we’ll be finishing out the chapter and the book today.
We will have one more sermon - kind of an overview or review of the book next week but this morning we’ll finish off the last remaining verses.
Look at the lavish language with which Paul talks about these men, these compatriots of his in the work of the Gospel.
Dearly loved.
Faithful.
Servant - and the word translated servant here is δουλος meaning slave - of Christ.
Paul is expressing a deep affection for these men.
Do we talk about people that way?
Maybe that would seem a little odd but more importantly do we think about one another this way?
As we look at each of these men and what they did with and for Paul we each should examine our own affections for one another - as well as how far we are willing to go for one another - because really we cannot make it in this Christian life alone.
It is in sections of Scripture like this that we see the great importance of community.
The Messengers
The first two men mentioned are Paul’s couriers carrying this letter to the church.
In the first century there was no post office or FedEx.
When you wrote a letter it had to be carried to the recipient by someone.
Paul demonstrates great trust in both of these men to carry something so clearly important as this letter as well as the letter of Ephesians (which was around 100 miles west of Colossae) and the letter of Philemon.
Tychicus has great history with Paul.
Probably a convert from the city of Ephesus, Tychicus was a part of Paul’s entourage during his final trip to Jerusalem.
Not only does Paul place great trust in Tychicus to carry the letter but also to be able to speak on his behalf to the church of Colossae.
He says that Tychicus will tell the church all the news about him.
Tychicus would have to be able to answer all of the Colossians questions not only about Paul but also with regards to the doctrinal content of the letter.
Tychicus had made a deep impression on Paul.
We don’t have much information about him or his conversion.
He is really only mentioned in the New Testament four times, but the four times are significant.
He is mentioned here in Colossians and in the book of Ephesians as the courier for Paul.
The other two mentions are in 2 Timothy and Titus.
In 2 Timothy Paul says
and then in Titus
The mention in 2 Timothy was years after the writing of this current letter and Tychicus has earned the ability to replace those who had been in places of eldership in the churches that Paul was sending him.
I have already highlighted the clear affection that Paul had for not only Tychicus but for all the men in this conclusion, but the threefold description that he uses to describe Tychicus is only used here in all of his letters.
He calls Tychicus a dear brother, a faithful minister and a fellow servant in the Lord.
The only other comparable statements are made in Philippians regarding Epaphroditus.
In both cases Paul is making commendatory statements to the churches he is sending these men to.
In Epaphroditus’ case, Paul is commending him to ease the perception of the Philippians regarding the return of the messenger they had sent to Paul.
They were expecting him to send Timothy but instead, he chose to keep Timothy and send Epaphroditus instead.
His commendation of Epaphroditus was meant to put the Philippians minds at ease that their messenger had not somehow offended Paul or been delinquent in his duties.
In fact, if you read more of that Philippians 2 passage, Epaphroditus had almost died in the completion of his duties.
Here, Paul is commending Tychicus to the church in Colossae to establish his credibility to speak against the false teaching that was threatening the church there.
He is called a dear brother not simply as a fellow Christian but also as one who has been through deep and bonding experiences with Paul as he has worked with Paul in ministry.
It was Shakespeare in his play Henry V that first coined the term “band of brothers”.
The English were outnumbered by the French and Henry stands up on Saint Crispin’s Day to urge his men on to courage, to remind them of previous great feats against the French with these words
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs'd they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.
The experience of Paul and Tychicus would have forged them into a band of brothers that had deep affection for one another and could rightly call each other a “band of brothers”.
Paul also calls Tychicus a faithful minister not only for his faithfulness to Paul during their travels together but also for his faithfulness in ministry to the churches across the Mediterranean basin.
We’ve already looked at two instances where Paul would dispatch Tychicus to fill the role of elder in a church to free up Timothy and Titus, two of the key elders in the planting and formation of new churches in the first century, for ministry to Paul or elsewhere.
Tychicus had proven faithful in the little areas of ministry to the churches and when the time was right he was given great responsibility and trust by Paul.
Referring to Tychicus as a fellow servant gives us a final piece of this man’s character.
A key characteristic of Paul in his ministry, and one that he emulates from his Master Christ, is humility and lowliness of thought regarding himself or his station.
Paul would never have embraced the notion that you have to have a high self-esteem or self-worth to be valuable in ministry (or any other realm of life for that matter).
Calling Tychicus a fellow servant tells us that this man embodied the traits of the humble servant as well.
Paul had no concerns that in sending Tychicus in his stead and with his recommendation that Tychicus would use the name of Paul to gain influence or to take advantage of the Colossians because of Tychicus’ demonstrated humility.
In addition to being able to expound on all that Paul has written in the letter, Tychicus would also be entrusted with informing the Colossian church how Paul was doing.
The church would naturally be concerned regarding the condition of one they would have considered as their spiritual father.
Even though Paul had never physically been to Colossae, his preaching of the Gospel had directly influenced the planting of the church there and so, even from a distance, he would have been their spiritual father.
Tychicus would not only be able to inform the church of how Paul was faring in prison but also be able to encourage their hearts in the process as he described how Paul had not faltered but remained steadfast in his commitment and preaching of the Gospel.
When I was younger I attended Star Lake Music Camp.
One of our activities was to have the privilege to play the National Anthem in Shea Stadium before a Mets game.
It was an awesome time.
The next morning we all gathered around the flag pole as usual at 8 for the raising of the American flag.
When the band assigned finished playing the National Anthem - always a solemn occasion at camp my teenage self took off my Cardnials hat (I was an Ozzie Smith fan) and promptly threw it in the air calling out with all the gusto I could manage “Play Ball”.
Every eye fell on me - and it was an uncomfortable moment.
I was incredibly embarrassed and humiliated.
And I think that the way I was feeling would only have been a fraction of how Onesimus felt.
We often love to think we’re in total control of events - that we can plan things out to the nth degree and they will turn out exactly as we design.
I’m certainly that way - I’m a planner.
Before we moved home from Japan I spent hours researching driving routes from New Hampshire to California, where we would stay, when we would stop - everything down to the last detail.
What I failed to account for was the 4, 2 and 1 year old that would be traveling with us - or even the two dogs.
We had to change hotel reservations twice and our last leg from Denver to San Diego was done in one day because one of our dogs got sick.
But I certainly had it well planned out in my head
Onesimus had a plan as well.
He was going to run away.
We don’t know what kind of master Philemon was - whether he was benevolent or not.
From some of Paul’s words about him in the letter that would have accompanied the letter to the Colossians, it would lead me to believe that he was probably a good and just master and that Onesimus was possibly a wicked, lazy slave.
So he decided to run away and his plan was to run to Rome and hide in the most populous city of the time among a large slave population - to get lost in anonymity.
That probably wouldn’t have been my plan - I would’ve gone more for a small unobtrusive village where I could just blend in, run from my past and completely change who I was.
But, Onesimus’ past catches up with him.
Not in the form of slave catchers or bounty hunters - but in the person of the Apostle Paul.
Through God’s sovereign movement in his life Onesimus meets Paul and gets converted.
And now here he is accompanying Tychicus in the carrying of this letter and the letter to his former owner that would plead for his acceptance.
Paul actually desired to keep him in Rome - and if I were Onesimus this would’ve been my desire as well.
My thought would be Paul you write the letter and lets see how he responds first before I go back.
Paul even desired to keep him with him
But both Paul and Onesimus knew that wouldn’t be the right thing to do, so here he stands.
But he doesn’t stand there empty handed.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9