Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.5LIKELY
Disgust
0.52LIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.68LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.12UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.83LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.89LIKELY
Extraversion
0.23UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.7LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.81LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
1-8
Today we come across a steward.
A steward is someone who takes care of things on behalf of a business or a person normally in the running of a household and would include its finances- the NIV says manager which doesn’t quite cover it.
It was a very responsible job and came with status in society.
And your reputation is all that you have.
An accusation is made against this man that he had been wasting his master’s goods.
And I’ve already said your reputation is all you have.
An accusation sticks whether it is true or false.
There’s no smoke without fire is a common saying, which, along with sticks and stones may break your bones but words will never hurt me, is completely false.
An accusation can be made by someone who is simply jealous of you or wants your job or is bitter about something completely unrelated to you or is simply a trouble maker.
I cannot stress enough that just because an accusation has been made it does not mean that there is anything about it that is true.
A lot of lies are told and often a lot of exaggeration and then it is someone’s reputation that is destroyed.
The smoke is a smokescreen to hide whoever made the accusation in the first place.
Speaking if this whilst a certain Carl Beech is before the courts right now accused of perverting the cause of justice and fraud by making accusation against those who have been in power of paedophilia and murder.
He himself is a convicted paedophile.
He created the smoke but there was no fire.
The reputations of people he tried to destroy including one who died whilst under investigation - and then what of Cliff Richard and others that either find there is no case to answer or found not guilty.
The problem with making accusations is that there is always left an element of doubt in the person being accused.
I do say that I am overjoyed that the Jeremy Kyle Show has been axed for this show ruined reputations and with the lie detector tests that are not used in our courts because of their unreliability.
What was the purpose of this but for us to be voyeurs and judges of others.
Well, what other people get up to, right?
But our own hearts condemn us for none of us are sinless.
Well, we are not told whether the accusation against this steward was true or false.
All we know is that it cost him his job.
And he had to give an account but either way he will not be able to hold on to his position for, as I’ve said, accusations ruin reputations whether true or false and this would reflect back on the master - so he had to go.
He is told that he has to clear his desk out.
Now imagine that this man is in his 50s.
He is an office worker.
He has done no manual labour; he has no callouses on his soft hands.
Who is going to give him a job?
Especially as he has just been sacked on the suspicion of fraud or theft.
And is he going to beg? No, he is too ashamed.
In a book written more than 2000 years ago it says: It is better to die than to beg!
So, he embarked on a plan in his notice period to get into the good books of all those who owed money one way or another to his master.
He reduced each of their debts substantially.
Then each of them will see how hard done by the steward has been and give him help when he needed it.
If his reputation was to be ruined then he can at least salvage it among others.
If he was to be accused of being underhanded he might as well be underhanded to gain the upper hand.
Was he dishonest before or not?
Well, the weight of verse 8 seems to indicate that the accusation in his case was true.
He used his intelligence and canniness as he had before for his own gain.
Here is where it gets clever: In this time, as today among Orthodox Jews, you were not allowed to charge interest, in fact it was illegal in Jesus’ day.
But that did not mean that they did not charge it.
In fact, a charge would be added to the cost of the loan as if it was the price of the goods originally.
Sometimes they would charge twice as much sometimes just a fifth depending on the item.
This was simple common practice.
It was a way to bend the rules.
Why is this important?
Well, if you must know the Master is never actually out of pocket when the steward calls in the debtors.
He wrote off the part of the debt that was originally added.
The master would get back what was his though without interest and the steward wrote off debt that made the debtors now indebted to him in the future.
These were not small write-downs by the way.
They were substantial.
For instance for the one who owed a hundred measures of oil he then owed 50.
Originally 800 gallons of oil became 400 gallons.
Originally it was 146 olive trees now it was 73.
And you would need a very large olive grove to pay back that debt.
Now when the unemployed man did his rounds he would have a seat at the table and maybe a bed for the night.
He would be treated very well.
This is how grateful the debtors would have been.
And what do you know?
The Master congratulated the steward for his behaviour for it was with foresight and intelligence that he had looked out for number one.
Was he offered his job back?
Well, that would be too fairy tale wouldn’t it!
This steward had faced up to reality.
He had to do something quickly or he would be destitute and didn’t bury his head in the sand.
He used all his faculties to ensure that he was going to come out of this well.
He knew how desperate the situation was and through sheer strength of will, energy and thought he was going to be better than OK.
Jesus then contrasts the people of the light with this steward.
The steward stood on the edge of disaster humanly speaking but Christians stand on the edge of eternity knowing the disaster humanity is heading towards.
If only Christians gave as much will, energy and thought to eternal things as they do to the things of this world then perhaps, as this man was earthly shrewd in having comfort in the here and now we would be spiritually shrewd to ensure our reward in Heaven and bringing others who were on the brink of eternal disaster.
9
We are then told a curious thing by Jesus.
People of the world make friends with others with money.
This is not news.
Find me a rich man with no friends.
People simply come out of the woodwork when there is someone with money.
This is not the curious thing Jesus said.
No.
The curious thing is that Jesus said that we should make friends with others with money.
How do we use the money we have?
It is mostly spent on ourselves would you not agree?
How much of what we have do we use for mission?
But I am not talking about what we give to the Church or BMS but about our own personal mission with the people that we come into contact with.
Do we buy them a coffee?
Invite for dinner?
How else can we use what we have to make friends?
Because one day money will fail.
When will that be?
Indeed, it could fail any day as history can teach us.
But there will be a day when money will fail altogether and that is when Jesus returns.
So, what is Jesus talking about here?
Is He not speaking of using our money to make friends so that we can introduce them to God?
After all that is what Jesus says: when money fails then we will be received into eternal homes along with them.
So, now, again I ask: How do we use our money?
10-12
Maybe the steward was skimming off the top for himself in small ways that were barely noticeable but then he went large for his own benefit by the big deductions of debt owed.
Why do I repeat this?
If you are unfaithful in small things then you will be in big.
I think about corruption that is done on a grand scale but I reckon it must have started out small.
The more one gets away with it the bolder one gets.
When I hear about Financial Controllers stealing money from companies because the temptation is too great and they steal in the tens of thousands a pattern can be found when they were dealing in the tens of pounds and before that you could trace back whether they would take stationery like pens or paper home.
If you are not responsible with small things you will not be responsible with large.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9