Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.48UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.46UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.06UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.89LIKELY
Extraversion
0.4UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.91LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.75LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
1-14
Soon after Easter day, we are not told exactly when, the seven disciples mentioned here went on a fishing trip.
After all this is what Peter, James and John did before Jesus called them.
Now, we assume, since they left everything to follow Jesus at the start that this is one of their father’s boats or, perhaps, they rented one.
I know many men who love going fishing, I am not one of them.
The only appeal is perhaps the silence, the sound of the water and the black starry sky.
Come to think of it, it is very appealing - just not the fishing part.
I want to be the one that doesn’t catch anything.
But that is not normal.
These men are not like me however, though they wanted to and though these are experienced fishermen they did not catch a thing - it must have been very disappointing for them.
It is hard to work and receive nothing in return.
I am sure that there was great camaraderie on the boat despite all this.
Now it is time to pack up and go home and they start to draw near to the shore enough that a Man on the beach calls out to them and they can hear.
“Did you catch anything?”
they are asked.
“No”, they say.
Throw your net over the side of the boat and you will catch.
There is a familiar ring to this story - didn’t this happen before?
Indeed, we read in:
And what do you know, with no question, with no pride saying ‘we’re expert fishermen - what you’re suggesting is ludicrous’ - they throw their net on the other side and lo and behold fill the net with fish.
Now it becomes obvious who the Man on the beach is.
It is none other than Jesus.
At which point Peter who has an eye for the dramatic throws himself into the sea to swim for shore - instead of staying onboard and rowing there.
Plainly Peter made it to land first and helps haul the net up with the 153 fish.
Very precise in their counting - they probably sold the fish at market later that day, after all, there are still bills to pay and lives to live.
Jesus knows about our toils and work and is not interested in us having a fruitless life.
So, Jesus enters in and gives us the guidance we need if we are open to hear it.
The point is Jesus cares.
For the disciples who had experienced this before it was to confirm that they were no longer called to be fishermen but fishers of men as Jesus told them in:
Of course there is a spiritual picture to all this.
There were the seven disciples on the sea and getting nothing for their labours.
The sea in Scripture is almost always representative of the nations when not talking literally about the sea.
And we are called to fish in the sea of people.
However, I am reminded of
Sometimes we will fish for people and not get any.
Other times will seem especially blessed.
Either way it takes work and effort as any fisherman will tell you.
But the point we need to get above all is what Jesus says in:
This is true of all ministry and life but especially when it comes to evangelism but that does not mean that we can rest back awaiting a divine command from above - we already have it in the great commission - we are told to go - and the reason we are not as successful as we should be is because we’d rather stay at home.
Back to the disciples’ reality: The upshot was they needn’t have bothered about the fish for Jesus was already cooking breakfast and not with the fish they caught though he did cook some of their fish too.
They seem almost surplus to requirements.
And then he gives them fish and bread.
All very reminiscent of the feeding of the four and five thousand.
This appearance by Jesus, the third time to the disciples, was to make them realise beyond a shadow of doubt that He was no ghost, that He really is alive.
You can imagine that between appearances you might think that it was all an imagination or hallucination.
15-25
But now we come to the crux of the story.
Breakfast was great, Jesus’ cooking is second to none but there is something of a cloud over one particular person and that was Peter.
Peter who in his impetuousness said: “I will die with you” just before they arrived at the Garden of Gethsemane, who fled after he cut off the son of the high priest’s ear with a sword, and then whilst following Jesus from afar and coming into the courtyard of the high priest warming himself by the fire was asked on three separate times: You know Jesus, don’t you?
And denying Him every time swearing with oaths and probably swearing like a fisherman that He did not know Him.
And the famous crow made his voice heard and the realisation set in on Peter that he had done the very opposite of what he claimed he would do for Jesus.
The great thing is that Jesus was not caught out by surprise and had already prophesied it would happen this way.
It just so happened that Jesus was being led from one place to another through that same courtyard just as Peter denied him the third time and shot Peter a look and their eyes met.
The omniscient eyes of Jesus looked right into Peter’s soul.
How devastating that must have been, obviously for Peter but also for Jesus.
His best friend, one of His inner circle, he had been dismissed as of being no one to him.
Yes, indeed, when Jesus appeared after his resurrection to Peter He said: “Peace be with you”.
Something that would ordinarily be comforting but he could not get over the look given by Jesus when He had failed.
He could never know peace again.
He doubted he could ever be on good terms with Jesus again.
Since then, nothing has been said.
When the women saw the angels at the tomb they said go tell the disciples and Peter what they had seen and heard.
Peter was now an outsider.
Now, whilst they were warming themselves after breakfast and the banter had died down.
Jesus asks Peter three times, “do you love me?”
And each time Peter is much more cautious about his answers than before for he can no longer be so bolshy about his faith for he felt humiliated, he felt he had let Jesus down, himself and the others, he was so ashamed.
He can no longer bear it.
Oh the grace of God and Jesus.
Indeed, Peter had made a right mess of it but Jesus did not want to leave him in the pit of despair and self-condemnation.
Instead, he wants to put Peter back into a right relationship with him and get him back on the road, as it were.
The first time: Jesus asks: Simon, do you love me more than these other disciples?
Here Jesus uses the word ‘agape’ - unconditional love.
What was Peter’s first reply?
Gone is the impetuousness.
He doesn’t say I unconditionally love you but instead uses a different Greek word, a lesser word: ‘phileo’, which means I have affection for you.
No longer could he say as he had before in:
And Jesus’ use of the name of Simon was to make him think of what he was without Jesus in his life, before Jesus called him ‘Peter’.
The second time: Jesus asks: Do you love me?
Here Jesus uses the word ‘agape’ and Peter’s second reply was ‘I have affection for you.’
This time Jesus does not compare with the others - simply - Simon, do you love me?
The third time: Jesus asks: Do you love me?
Here Jesus uses the word ‘phileo’ that Peter had been using - do you have affection for me Peter?
And Peter answers you know I have affection for you.
Jesus accepts His answer for He truly does know that this is the truth.
Peter uses the word ‘know’ in two ways here: One - you know every little detail, that is the omniscience of Jesus and second, you know me personally, intimately.
Jesus knows how much we truly love Him.
Three times Peter denied, three time Peter affirmed his love for the Lord.
Feeling chastened, for sure, revealed by the using of a lesser word for love but as a result he is restored to a right relationship with Jesus.
Peter had denied Jesus around a fire and now Peter had confirmed his love for Him around a fire.
Each time Peter answers Jesus says something each time: the first time “feed my lambs”, the second “tend my sheep” and the third time “feed my sheep”.
Not only was Jesus restoring the relationship but He was also giving him something to do.
You know that this relationship is right when despite his failures he was given a new work to do.
This reveals that Jesus had faith in Peter not so much about Peter’s faith in Jesus.
This also gives us great hope.
Indeed what we do we may fail whether through incompetency, through moral failure, through laziness and through a myriad of other things…the past is not always a reflection of the future.
Past failures does not mean you will fail in the future.
And this is what Jesus sees: he sees our potential when others will not get past our lack of success.
And this means that we should also be able to move on from our mistakes too.
First, though, we have to get our relationship right with God and that is what Jesus sought to do with Peter, and the first thing to know is: do we love God? do we love Jesus for this is the first command, right?
We are to love God with all our heart, soul and strength; this is the priority to everything else.
Our true goal in life is God Himself.
Then, and only then, can we move onto serving Jesus.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9