Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.48UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.55LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.52LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.64LIKELY
Extraversion
0.31UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.38UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.5UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Context: Matthew Chapter 9: Jesus heals a paralytic man and says “your sins are forgiven” he’s then called a blasphemer and then this is Jesus’ famous #burn: Is it easier to say your sins are forgiven or to heal him?
Micdrop.
He then calls Matthew…and another Jesus micdrop: “those who are well have no need of a physician but those who are sick” I desire mercy, and not sacrifice … For I came not to call the righteous but sinners
He then calls Matthew…and another Jesus micdrop: “those who are well have no need of a physician but those who are sick” I desire mercy, and not sacrifice … For I came not to call the righteous but sinners
Matthew 9:1-
So, today marks the beginning of City Light’s first “sermon series” !
How exciting.
We will be going through Jesus’ parables.
I get the honor of kicking us off.
We will be in today.
So… for the most part we know all know that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are the Gospel accounts.
The Gospel according to… insert name here.
We also know that each author has his own focus:
The result is a rich diversity within the synoptic unity which provides portrayals of Jesus from a variety of viewpoints.
Matthew emphasizes Jesus’ Jewishness and the continuity of his person and work with the OT.
Mark’s fast-moving account presents Jesus as a man of action, the Son of God who was a servant among men.
Luke, in exquisite Greek literary style, seems to address cultured Gentiles and shows Jesus as a friend of disadvantaged groups.
We all have pre-understandings and presuppositions when we open up our Bibles.
We have a tendency to read into it our own life and experiences and we are also quick to contextualize the Bible first and foremost through our 21st century American context.
So, when we talk about oral tradition or the richness of Jesus’ method of teaching we can often be a little out of our element.
As you guys may know, I love The Lord of the Rings.
I love stories.
I think there its a shame that our kids love stories so much and then all of a sudden we hit an age where we stop reading stories.
We enter into a realm of realism…
We are a story formed people.
The entirety of Scripture is a story that started a long time ago in a Garden with Man, Woman, a Serpent and God.
It ends with these people being banished and an angelic being guarding the Garden from any who attempts to enter it again.
It’s important that we never forget the elements of story found within Scripture.
Hear me on this: i’m not saying that Scripture is fiction but that that Scripture tells one story…ebbing and flowing towards eternity.
I fully believe that a lot of our identity issues stem from the fact that we are all deep down yearning for what Adam and Eve had in the Garden before sin.
All of our internal compasses are pointing to a relational God that loves us unconditionally and in whom we find our innermost identities.
I also believe technology, and this is coming from someone who loves technology, is our continued attempt to make up for what was lost in that Garden.
Tangent over:
Did you know that parables make up about 35% of Jesus’ teachings?
Understanding parables then is essential to understanding Jesus’ teachings.
There is also one major difference for Jesus between the present day: the parables are not the sermon illustrations… they are the sermons.
Medieval interpreters would break the parables into a multiple meanings approach:
literal meaning
An allegorical meaning [relating to Christian theology]
a moral meaning giving direction for daily life
a heavenly meaning indicating something about future life
So…are parables merely heavenly stories with earthly meanings?
Or is there more?
I don’t want to get lost in the woods here but parables include: figurative, literal, allegorical, riddles, paradoxes.
Almost every parable (I may go to the extent and say every parable) tells us about the Kingdom of God and what its going to be like or is.
The parables focus on God and his kingdom and in doing so reveal what kind of God he is, by what principles he works, and what he expects of humanity.
Because of the focus on the kingdom, some of the parables reveal many aspects of Jesus’ mission as well (note the Parable of the Wicked Tenants in Mt 21:33–39 and pars).
Parables:
Are concise and symmetrical (unnecessary details are omitted)
Everyday life features
Contain elements of surprise or hyperbole
Parables require their hearers to pass judgment on the events told of in the story… they then realize that they must make a similar judgment in their own lives.
Alrighty, English class has now concluded.
Lets read together from
Context: Matthew Chapter 9: Jesus heals a paralytic man and says “your sins are forgiven” he’s then called a blasphemer and then this is Jesus’ famous #burn: Is it easier to say your sins are forgiven or to heal him?
and then he drops the mic.
He then calls Matthew…and another yet again Jesus drops the mic: “those who are well have no need of a physician but those who are sick” I desire mercy, and not sacrifice … For I came not to call the righteous but sinners
Excellent.
So, this is one of those weird parables that you kind of remember reading or hearing about but chances are you’d have a hard time explaining it.
So, the disciple of John (John the Baptist) roll up and say “hey, we fast, the pharisees fast, but your crew doesn’t fast...” Jesus starts talking about a wedding and wineskins.
So the first part if fairly easy to decipher or to read through: Jesus is referring to himself as the bridegroom and his disciples are the ‘wedding guests.’
Jesus equates fasting here with a ‘mourning ritual’ and says, essentially, one day I will die (you can see this foreshadowing element) and then they will mourn and fast.
Now Jesus’ and his disciples most likely fasted during the Day of Atonement and other Jewish feasts but this was more of a 2x week fasting for religious piety.
Once again, we see this continue to come up within the Gospels: religious piety (a lot of times this was synonymous with looking religious for outward approval vs inward religion or true repentance).
Jesus echos this when he says that he has come for the sick and not the healthy.
Or that he requires mercy and not sacrifice.
I require a heart change not just mere following of religious rituals and routines.
Cf.
Mk 2:18–22; Lk 5:33–39.
Some members of the socioreligious elite were disturbed that Jesus would eat with sinners (9:11); other religiously committed persons were disturbed that he ate (9:14)—or more particularly, that they did not observe his disciples fasting.
For some, holiness meant avoiding eating with ungodly people; for others, holiness meant religious practices of self-discipline like fasting.
For both, Jesus undoubtedly appeared self-indulgent (11:19).
Thus Jesus responds with three illustrations about appropriateness: it is rude for the wedding party to fast during a wedding banquet when they must share the groom’s joy; likewise, though new cloth and wine are good, they are inappropriate for vessels they will not fit.
The celebration of sinners returning to God through Jesus’ ministry is an inappropriate time for fasting
“Fasting should be the expression of sorrow; not merely an outward exercise, but the expression of an inward state.
These men were always focusing on outward exercises and not an inward state/disposition/ and angling of the heart.
Even Jesus here could’ve easily stated that he did indeed fast… () but instead he argues that some times are inappropriate for fasting…
Thats the wedding explained but what about this business with wineskins and cloth?
1. Anyone sew here?
You would never put a unshrunk cloth on an old garment…the old garment is already shrunken (?) So, when you fit up your patch and then wash it it’s going to shrink and pull at the old garment…causing it to be destroyed.
No one puts a piece of unshrunk cloth on an old garment, for the patch tears away from the garment, and a worse tear is made.
Neither is new wine put into old wineskins.
If it is, the skins burst and the wine is spilled and the skins are destroyed.
But new wine is put into fresh wineskins, and so both are preserved.
Oenology 101: Thats wine-making 101
Grapes + Fermentation = Wine
Skins on grapes already have yeast growing on them
As grapes are crushed, juice begins fermenting spontaneously
Yeast turns the natural sugars in the grape juice into alcohol and carbon dioxide
Fermentation process often continues after the wine has been stored in wineskins
The release of the carbon dioxide causes the wineskins to expand.
Wineskins were made from cleaned animal hides (often goats), wineskins were used for carrying wine offerings, for travel and for storing new wine.
As the wine inside continues to ferment, the skin would stretch to the point of losing its elasticity.
So here lies the rub.
If new wine was then stored in these old bags, people would fill them and then the natural expansion process would happen but because the bag could no longer expand and would burst from the pressure.
Make sense now?
We know what Jesus is talking about but what the heck does this have to do with fasting, weddings and patches?
We see a few things… the new thing, which is developing and expanding, can only be put with a new garment or new wineskin.
Even the attempt to add a patch or to reuse an old wineskin, however good intentioned, will just end up with both the old and new perishing together.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9