Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.08UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.19UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.53LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.09UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.34UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.7LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.43UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.58LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Evangelical Question
The year was 1966.
A movement towards ecumenism was in full swing and growing like a wildfire in Britain.
On one side, there was the Anglican Church of England, which was preaching a message of inclusivity for the gospel, and on the other side, there were the Congregationalists, who were preaching a message of exclusivity for the gospel.
There were faithful saints on both sides of the spectrum.
The face of the Anglicans was John Stott, the famed author and priest.
The face of the Congregationalists was D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, the famed author and pastor.
Both men were comrades.
Both men respected the work of the other.
Yet the rift between both men was growing with each passing day.
However, we think to ourselves, how do situations like the one above even occur?
Doesn’t Paul say these timeless words on unity in ?
One spirit.
One mind.
For the faith of the gospel.
And in what manner?
“συναθλοῦντες”.
Struggling, or competing, alongside one another in
Case Study: The Jerusalem Council ()
Case Study #2: The Anglican Debate (1534-1662)
Case Study #3: The Social Justice Movement (2015-)
The Final Solution
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9