Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.47UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.24UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.38UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.7LIKELY
Extraversion
0.18UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.38UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.68LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*Matthew 5:20.
Your Righteousness must Exceed that of the Pharisees, for it was Hypocritical and Ugly.*
*Everton** **Community** **Church**.
**January 20th 2008**.*
There are *many differences between* *Americans and Canadians*.
One prominent public one is the *moral expectations* that *Americans require of the political leaders*.
*Republican candidate Mitt Romney*, has been *striving expensively* and *perhaps successfully for the Republican Party nomination* for *President of the United States*.
With *South Carolina's Republicans* *voting yesterday* and *Super Tuesday* *just ahead*, *great debate* has been going on *if Americans are ready for a Mormon president*.
What’s the *standard of morality* *expected?**
*
*Quote:** * Marlisa Fullmer, a Morman reflecting on the situation said: *“*If following the *Nicene Creed* is the only determining factor for being Christian, then *I guess we're not Christians*,*"*.
*She stated that: *the *Prophet Joseph Smith*, the *first head* of the Morman Church, was *himself a declared candidate for the **U.S.** presidency in 1844*, when he was shot to death by an anti-Mormon mob while being held in an Illinois jail.
(National Post: January 18, 2008.
http:~/~/www.nationalpost.com~/newsletter~/story.html?id=247793).
With the amount of *scrutiny of political candidates*, you wonder *how anyone can run*.
But let’s *take it one step further*.
*What if the requirements for the job said* that you had to be *more gracious than Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, and Guandi*.
*Who could run?*
Who would be *qualified to hold the office?*
*Jesus said:*
*Matthew **5:20*   [20]For I tell you, unless your *righteousness exceeds* that of *the scribes and Pharisees,* you will *never enter the kingdom of heaven*.
(ESV)
 
*Please turn to Luke 18*
 
It is the *false teaching of salvation by self-effort* that *Jesus confronts head-on in this verse *and which all of Scripture, from beginning to end, contradicts.
As Paul makes clear in the Book of Romans, even *Abraham*, *the father of the Jewish people*, was *saved by his faith, not by his works* (Rom.
4:3; cf.
Gen. 15:6).
In Galatians the apostle explains that “the Scripture has shut up all men under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe” (Gal.
3:22).
Outside of sin itself, *the Bible opposes* nothing more vehemently than the *religion of human achievement*.
*Jesus:*
*Luke 18:9-14*   [9]He also told this parable to some who *trusted in themselves* *that they were righteous*, and treated others with contempt: [10]"Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector.
[11]The *Pharisee,* *standing by himself, prayed* thus: 'God, *I* thank you that *I* am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector.
[12]*I *fast twice a week; *I* give tithes of all that *I* get.' [13]But the *tax collector*, *standing far off*, would *not even lift up his eyes to heaven,* but *beat his breast*, saying, *'God, be merciful* to *me, a sinner!*' [14]I tell you, this man went down to his house *justified*, rather than the other.
For everyone who *exalts himself will be humbled*, but the one who *humbles himself will be exalted*."
(ESV)
 
*The least-esteemed* and *most-hated man in Jewish society* was the *tax-gatherer*, a *fellow Jew who had sold out to **Rome** for the purpose of collecting taxes from his brethren.*
*He extorted* *all he could get from the people*, *keeping for himself* *everything he purloined above what **Rome** required*.
*He had forsaken* both *national, social, family, and religious loyalty* *for the sake* *of money*.
*The Pharisee*, on the other hand, was *the model Jew*, *highly religious*, *moral,* and *respectable*.
Yet *Jesus said *that, *despite the tax-gatherer’s treachery and sin*, he would be *justified by God* because of his penitent faith, whereas *the Pharisee*, *despite his high morals* and *religiousness,* *would be condemned, because he trusted in his own righteousness and good works.*
In *Matthew **5:20* *Jesus teaches* that *the sort of righteousness exemplified by the Pharisees* was *not sufficient* *to gain entrance into His kingdom*.
*To Jesus’* *legalistic, works-oriented hearers*, this was doubtlessly *the most radical thing He had yet taught*.
*If the meticulously religious and moral Pharisees* *could not get into heaven, who could?*
 
*After showing *the *preeminence *(v.
17), *permanence *(v.
18), and *pertinence *(v.
19) *of Scripture*, *Jesus now shows its purpose*.
From *the context of those preceding three verses *it is clear that *He is still speaking of “the Law and the Prophets,*” the *Old Testament Scriptures.* *In saying that true righteousness exceeds the kind displayed by the scribes and Pharisees,* Jesus said that, *whatever they did with man-made tradition*, they did *not live up* *to the standards of Scripture.*
*The implied truth of Matthew **5:20* is this: *The purpose of God’s law* was *to show* that, *to please God and to be worthy of citizenship in His kingdom*, *more righteousness is required than anyone can possibly have or accomplish in himself.*
*The purpose of the law* was *not to show* *what to do in order to make oneself acceptable*, *much less to show* *how good one already is*, *but to show* *how utterly sinful and helpless all men are in themselves*.
(That is one of Paul’s themes in Romans and Galatians.)
As the Lord pointed out to the Jews *in the first beatitude*, */the initial step toward kingdom citizenship/* is *poverty of spirit*, *recognizing one’s total wretchedness and inadequacy before God.*
Therefore *Jesus shows*:  *1) The Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees 2) The Righteousness God Requires, 3) The Righteousness God Gives*
* *
*1) The Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees*
* *
Like Ezra (Ezra 7:12), the earliest /gramraateōn/ (*scribes*) were *found* *only among the priests and Levites.*
Theirs was *a profession*, a job.
*They* *recorded, studied, interpreted*, and *often taught Jewish law.*
Although there were *some* scribes *among the Sadducees*, *most *were *associated with the Pharisees.*
Israel had *two kinds of scribes*, *civil and ecclesiastical*.
The *civil scribes* *functioned somewhat like notaries*, and were *involved in various governmental* *duties*.
Shimshai (Ezra 4:8) was such a scribe.
The *ecclesiastical scribes* *devoted their time to study of the Scriptures*, and *came to be its primary interpreters* and *articulators.*
Yet, as Jesus repeatedly made plain, *they failed* *to understand** what they studied and taught.
*With all their exposure to God’s Word, being *superficially immersed* in it continually, *they missed* *its profound spiritual intent*.
The *influential, rigid* *Pharisees* were particularly confident in *their system of righteousness*.
Theirs was *a sect*.
*The Jews had a saying*, *“*If *only two people go to heaven*, *one will be a scribe* and *the other a Pharisee*.*”*
Those men were *completely convinced that God was obligated* *to honour their devoted and demanding works*.
In *comparing themselves with the standards they had established*-and especially in *comparing themselves with the average Jew,* not to mention Gentile-*they could not* *imagine* *God was not favourably impressed with their goodness.*
Yet, like many serious and capable scholars throughout the history of the church, the Pharisees of Judaism were *also blind* *to the meaning of the words they diligently studied and discussed.*
* *Before we get too comfortable with ourselves* and right off the bat *distinguish ourselves from these two groups consider possible parallels:*
* *Do you ever tell yourself*: I’ve been a *Christian for many years*.
I’ve *done so much work* for the kingdom.
I’ve been to *the mission field*, *taught children*, *taught classes*, I *know God so well.*
*I’m not like* my *neighbour, colleague at work* who *doesn’t care about God*.
He sure *will face judgement.*
* Although *intellectually we can reject* *self-righteousness*, it is easy unless we *continually check ourselves*, to *slip into subtle pride*.
* *
*Quote: *One commentator said that *Religion* is *what someone does with their own solitude.*
If you want to know *what you really are*: look at your *thoughts and desires in private*.
Are you the *same person* in *public* that you are in *private?
*If not, then *your righteousness* may be that *of the Scribes and Pharisees.*
The standard of *righteousness* that *the scribes and Pharisees* *taught *and* practiced, and the one we have to guard ourselves against,* *differed from God’s righteousness* *in several important ways*.
It was *A) external, B) partial, C) redefined, and D) self-centered.
In these four warnings I will spend just about all my time.*
*A) external*
First of all the *scribes and Pharisees concerned* themselves *entirely with external observance of the law and tradition.*
They *took little consideration* *of motives* or *attitudes*.
They thought, no matter how much they may have *hated* a person, *if they did not kill him* they were *not guilty of breaking the commandment*.
No matter how much they may have *lusted*, they did not consider themselves guilty of *adultery or fornication* as long as they did *not commit the physical act.*
* *
* *Are we concerned* most about *programs and numbers* *or objectives* and *intents?*
* *Do we rationalize* that we keep *busy with religious activities* so that should *excuse the occasional* *harsh thought* or *distraction*.
Come on, *it’s not like we do* all the things we *read about in the paper*s and *see on TV*.
*We’re good people.*
* *That’s not how God sees it.*
* *
*Jesus’ next teachings in the Sermon on the Mount show *that *God’s first* *concern* is *with the heart: Further on in Matthew 5:*
*Matthew 5:22*   [*22*]But I say to you that everyone who is *angry *with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, 'You fool!' will be liable to the hell of fire.
[*27*]"You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit *adultery*.' [28]But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
(ESV)
* *Hypocrisy cannot substitute for holiness*.
*Quote:  C.
S. Lewis explains the conflict in /The Four Loves/.*
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9