Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.17UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.12UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.61LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.54LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.27UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.13UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.05UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.68LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The satan
So everyone who claims to be a Christian has some sort of Theology when it comes to the enemy of God.
But the bigger question is where do we get that theology?
Of course we would say from the Bible.
But as we have seen thus far.
Everything we know may not always be so easily understood.
Now my point thus far in our study is not to confuse or confound you.
Nor is it to suggest that any of the information I am giving you will be heretical or go against any of the main doctrines of Christianity.
That is not my point or objective.
But it is to get you to actually deal with the text.
And to deal with the text requires more than just simply reading some English words in a book that happens to have the letter B.I.B.L.E.
stamped on the front of it.
So when we see the letters in our Bible S.A.T.A.N.
How do we interpret that word?
Do we base all of our understanding of that word on what we have heard in church over the years.
I hope by now you see that my answer and yours should be no!
One of the main goals of the Bible is Theological messaging.
And when it comes to the enemies of God, things are no different.
If I want to understand a word in the Bible.
Where should I begin.? Well one place is a good Bible dictionary.
So here is the entry on satan.....
Satan The Hebrew word שָׂטָן (satan) means to oppose, obstruct, or accuse.
The Greek term (σατάν, satan) literally means “adversary.”
In the New Testament, it refers to a title or a name—(the) Satan.
The term שָׂטָן (satan) is rendered as diabolos in the Septuagint.
The Use of the Term “Satan” in the Hebrew Bible
In the Old Testament, the word satan is both a noun and a verb.
When used as a verb, it means “to oppose as an adversary” (e.g., Pss 38:20; 71:13; 109:4, 20, 29; Zech 3:1).
It is applied to a human adversary as a noun (e.g., 1 Sam 29:4; 2 Sam 19:22; 1 Kgs 5:4; 11:14, 23, 25).
In four books of the Old Testament, the term is attached to a supernatural being (Num 22:22, 32; Job 1:6, 7, 8; Zech 3:1; 1 Chr 21:1).
In biblical Hebrew, the definite article (the word “the) is a single letter (heh).
Hebrew prefixes (attaches) the definite article to a noun (or participle to make it a substantive) so that, like all languages that have definite articles, the noun is made specific.
Biblical Hebrew does not, however, put the definite article (the word “the”) on proper personal nouns (personal names).
In this respect, Hebrew is like English.
I don’t call myself “the Mike”.
No one (except maybe Donald Trump ) puts the word “the” in front of their first name.
Hebrew simply does not do this at all.
As the well known biblical Hebrew reference grammar by Jouon-Muraoka notes: “No proper noun of person takes the article, not even when it has the form of an adjective or a participle.”1
Without exception, the word “satan” in Job occurs *with* the article.
This indicates quite clearly that “satan” is *not* a personal name.
It is generic, and means “the adversary”.
The word can be used of human beings (1 Sam 29:4; 2 Sam 19:23; 1 Kings 5:18; 1 Kings 11:14).
All of these examples have “satan” without the article, but the referent is a human being, not a divine being, so we don’t have “Satan” here either.
In terms of statistics, the noun “satan” occurs 27 times in the Hebrew Bible, ten times *without* the article.
The Term “Satan” Applied to a Human Adversary
The word “satan” occurs as a noun at various points in the Old Testament to designate a human opponent.
It is translated in English Bibles as “adversary” or “enemy.”
For example, King Solomon speaks of the opportunity he has to build a temple because of the absence of any “satan” or “adversary” to hinder him from this endeavor (1 Kgs 5:4).
The term is also used by King David to speak of Abishai as an opponent or adversary (2 Sam 19:22).
The Term “Satan” Associated with a Supernatural Figure
In the Old Testament, the word “satan” is also used in association with a supernatural figure.
This is the case in the book of Numbers, where an Angel of the Lord is referred to as a “satan” when it obstructs the road being traveled by Balaam and his donkey (Num 22:22).
The angel is not a “satan,” but “opposes” Balaam.
Of these ten, seven refer to human beings and two refer to the Angel of Yahweh for sure.
The lone outlier is 1 Chron 21:1.
This is the famous passage where “Satan” provokes David to take a census, but in the parallel passage, 2 Sam 24:1-25, it’s Yahweh provoking David to take the census.
Due to this parallel, and due to the fact that “satan” here has no article, this is viewed by some as the single instance of an evil, cosmic figure called “satan” in the OT.
It actually isn’t, though.
If you’re familiar with my work on the two Yahwehs in the OT, the parallel (Yahweh-satan) is striking to you.
The “satan” figure here is none other than the Angel of Yahweh — and so this instance without the article is akin to the two instances in the book of Numbers where “satan” was used of the Angel.
This relieves the “is Yahweh Satan?” question and any notion of contradiction — since it would mean BOTH passages have Yahweh provoking David — one appears to be the invisible Yahweh; the other is the visible Yahweh.
The Book of Job
The book of Job has a supernatural “satan” figure, which operated under the authority of God as Job’s faithfulness was tested (Job 1:6).
In this context, the author placed a definite article (“the”) before the noun (“the satan”), which suggests the term is not a proper name, but rather a title or an office.
The figure appeared as an angel, a part of the divine council along with the sons of God, whose special task might have been to investigate the affairs of humanity on earth.
“The satan” of God’s court in the book of Job manifested himself more as an accuser than as a rebellious being.
In response to the Lord’s inquiry as to his whereabouts, “the satan” says he has been patrolling the earth (Job 1:7).
This could suggest that acting as a “satan” was a divinely given assignment (Tate, “Satan,” 462).
It is interesting that the Lord does not rebuke “the satan” in this context.
Rather, “the satan” is presented as one who may simply be skeptical about the religious integrity of Job (Tate, “Satan,” 463).
Job is an odd book.
That’s part of what makes it so interesting.
The story opens with a divine council scene—the sons of God appear before Yahweh (Job 1:6).
During the council meeting the satan shows up.
His rank is not clear.
The language is ambiguous with respect to whether he is of the same level as the sons of God or is on the scene as a servant official to the council.
The lower status is more likely, given what we learn about his job.
I use the phrase “the satan” deliberately.
The Hebrew (satan) means something like “adversary,” “prosecutor,” or “challenger.”
It speaks of an official legal function within a ruling body—in this case, Yahweh’s council.
When Yahweh asks the satan where he has been, we learn that his job involves investigating what is happening on earth (Job 1:7).
He is, so to speak, Yahweh’s eyes and ears on the ground, reporting what he has seen and heard.
The satan in Job 1–2 is not a villain.
He’s doing the job assigned to him by God.
The book of Job does not identify the satan in this scene as the serpent of Genesis 3, the figure known in the New Testament as the devil.
The Old Testament never uses the word saṭan of the serpent figure from Genesis 3. In fact, the word saṭan is not a proper personal noun in the Old Testament.
Old Testament scholars are well aware of all this.
Their conclusion that saṭan is not a proper personal name in the Old Testament is driven by Hebrew grammar.
Like English, Hebrew does not attach the definite article (the word “the”) to proper personal nouns.
English speakers do not refer to themselves (or to another person) with phrases like “the Tom” or “the Sally.”
I’m not “the Mike.”
English doesn’t use the definite article with personal names.
Neither does Hebrew.
Most of the twenty-seven occurrences of saṭan in the Hebrew Bible, however, do indeed have the definite article—including all the places English readers presume the devil is present (Job 1:6–9, 12; 2:1–4, 6–7; Zech 3:1–2).
The satan described in these passages is not the devil.
Rather, he’s an anonymous prosecutor, as it were, fulfilling a role in Yahweh’s council—bringing an accusatory report.
The instances of saṭan in the Old Testament that lack the definite article also don’t refer to the devil or the serpent figure.
Those occurrences describe either humans or the Angel of Yahweh, who is occasionally sent by God to “oppose” someone or execute judgment (e.g., Num 22:22–23).
The function of the office of the satan is why later Jewish writings began to adopt it as a proper name for the serpent figure from Genesis 3 who brought ruin to Eden.
That figure opposed God’s choices for his human imagers.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9