Faithlife Sermons

Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.16UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.47UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.65LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.58LIKELY
Extraversion
0.05UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.6LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.51LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Fire with Fire
Have you ever found yourself in a situation where people start getting a bit angry and raising their voice, and so you decide to step in a set everybody straight… by raising your voice at them!
You know I think it is an easy tendency for all of us.
We build up this righteous anger (or at least what we think of as a righteous anger), and then try to deal with it, but only to deal with it in a way that is just as bad, if not worse than what you got angry about.
At the heart of it, I believe we all want peace.
But it’s strange.
You see, we’ve somehow seemed to develop the idea that peace comes through strength.
You see this on an international level.
Peace keeping forces often use strength as a means to keep things down.
Now it’s not my intention to critique war efforts.
I recognise that there are a lot of complexities in this arena, of which I’m not an expert and of which I have now plan on exploring today.
But I just want to pick up on this idea of trying to gain peace through strength.
The truth is, it actually can work to a degree.
You see, people respond to force.
Partly because you don’t really have much choice.
But unfortunately, that’s not usually the end of the matter.
In fact, I want to suggest that quite often it can just escalate the problem.
And so we end up with a big problem - peace becomes something that is just doesn’t seem possible.
This problem exists on a global level - which is very evident with all of the conflicts throughout the world, but also on a more personal level.
You see, when we try to fix our personal problems by going head first into it, that is, trying to fix it with our own strength, usually we just make a big mess of it, and we don’t end up with any sort of personal peace.
Like last week, I want to take you back to the Old Testament again, see an example of this problem of peace, but in the process, what we’ll see is an amazing promise, one that we can cling to , even after the thousands of years that have passed since the giving of this prophecy.
Micah
If you were here last week, I took you to the prophet Zephaniah, which is in the group of books we call the 12 minor prophets.
I explained then how these twelve prophets wrote in a period stretching a few hundred years of each other.
Last week, I spoke about Zephaniah being somewhere in the middle of that time period, but today, with Micah, we are actually towards the start of that period.
That relates to the time in which the Northern Kingdom is being wiped out.
Just to fill the picture in a bit more, we are about 700 odd years prior to the birth of Christ.
For a few hundred years before this, the nation of Israel had been divided into a northern kingdom and a southern one.
Both kingdoms continued to operate in a way that displeased God, and so God raised up a foreign army, namely, Assyria, who wiped out this northern kingdom.
The prophet Micah started prophesying prior to the northerners being wiped out, but by the time we get to chapter 5, it is the south that are under siege.
The conflicts
But I think it’s worth back tracking to see what happened in the stages leading up to this, because it will feed well into our discussion on seeking peace.
You see, tells us that Micah’s prophecies came during the reigns of Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah.
We’ll get to the conflict involving Hezekiah shortly, which will be the context of chapter 5, but there is this other conflict during the day of Ahaz.
The earlier conflict
You see, in the day of king Ahaz, Assyria had only recently become the dominate world power, but at that stage had not yet moved it’s full attention to Israel.
But that did not mean that Israel had peace - in fact far from it.
You see, there was another foreign nation that was causing a lot of grief, namely Aram.
Now Aram, with it’s capital city of Damascus, was just north of Israel, but not as far north as Assyria.
Well, during the day of King Ahaz, Aram and the northern kingdom made some sort of agreement and decided that they would make a joint attack on the Southern kingdom.
Now Ahaz was the king of this Southern kingdom, also known as Judah, and he was quite aware that he did not have the power to stand up to a combined attack from the north.
But into this came another prophet, namely Isaiah.
Isaiah clearly told Ahaz that he should trust God and he will deliver.
Interestingly, it was actually in the midst of this exchange that we get some of our great Christmas promises, like, a virgin shall be with child, and for unto us a child is given (but I’ll leave that for another year).
The bottom line of this story however, is that despite Isaiah urging Ahaz to leave it to God, Ahaz instead chose to go the way of power.
You see, Ahaz had another plan.
If the northerners were going to collaborate with Aram, then he would call on Assyria.
Remember, I said at this time Assyria had not yet turned its gaze on Israel.
Well now it would turn in a dramatic way.
And you know what - in one sense, it actually worked for Ahaz.
Assyria did come and wipe took out the Northern Kingdom and Aram.
Ahaz might have been pleased with himself for such a great tactical move - but it came at a great cost.
It now meant that he was subject to Assyria, and the consequences wouldn’t be nice.
Hezekiah’s conflict
Well fast forward a few years and Ahaz has passed on, and we have his son, Hezekiah as king now.
Nothing has improved since his dad made a deal with Assyria, in fact things had progressively got worse.
The Northern kingdom have now gone, but with the few people that were left up there, Hezekiah made an effort to unite them.
In some ways this again was an attempt at reaching peace.
But all of that will count for nothing because after Hezekiah decides that Assyria have started asking for too much and consequently stops paying the required tribute, Assyria crack down hard.
And when I say crack down hard, I’m talking about an army of about 185,000 people surrounding Jerusalem.
This is not a drill - this is serious.
The outcome essentially seems inevitable.
Jerusalem does not stand a chance.
But in the midst of all of this, that character called Isaiah pops his head up again.
Again he has the same message - don’t trust man, trust God.
Thankfully, this time, things go differently.
Hezekiah takes a letter given to him by Assyria, and physically lays it down before the Lord… and prays!
That very act shows just how very much King Hezekiah realises that this is beyond him and he needs God.
And then, the most amazing thing happens.
Well, let me read to you the outcome as read from
It is one of the most dramatic turn arounds of all time - in my view, even greater than the odds of David beating Goliath.
Apparently some have suggested the army might have died of the bubonic plague as apparently from another source it was suggested rats or mice were involved.
How reliable that is I have no idea, but however God did it, it shows his great power.
Micah’s vision
But let me rewind just a bit because it is while Assyria surrounded Jerusalem.
It is generally thought that this is the very context for the start of , when it says: “Marshal your troops now, city of troops, for a siege is laid against us.
Now, knowing the background that I’ve just mentioned, you might wonder, why on earth is he telling them to marshal their troops.
But I’d suggest that this is his way of saying, don’t back down now, you haven’t been defeated yet.
That first verse then goes on to say, “they will strike Israel’s ruler on the cheek with a rod”.
In other words, Israel will have some damage and humilitation, but it’s not going to be fatal.
But then in verse 2, the picture suddenly changes.
You know, sometimes you get those moments where there is absolute chaos all around you, but even in the middle of all of that chaos, suddenly it becomes clear.
Sometimes movie makers will depict similar moments.
If you think of many action movies, often it will start to climax towards the end of the movie with lots of chaos, but then as the hero comes to the realisation of what he has to do, the movie maker will cut all noise as the way forward becomes clear.
In someway, I think that is what is happening here.
The siege is under way.
They are about to be struck.
But then the noise stops.
But in view is not just the victory I mentioned before.
Instead the view goes even further afield.
You see, in view is a new leader.
A leader who is to come out of Bethlehem Ephrathah.
Now just for clarity, Bethlehem is the name of a town and Ephrathah is the name of the region, so it’s a bit like saying, Tanilba Bay Port Stephens.
This mention of Bethlehem would have been really surprising.
You see, while we might be very familiar with Bethlehem for an obvious reason, the truth is, Bethlehem wasn’t very significant at this time.
It was just a small town that didn’t feature much.
But in many ways, this is part of God’s style.
You see, very rarely does God choose the powerful.
Rather he is about turning upside down the wisdom of this world.
He shows how we get power out of weakness.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9