Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.54LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.73LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.21UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.83LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.25UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.07UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.18UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.57LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
This is a well-known parable, perhaps even the best known parable of Jesus.
It was originally given with the two precediing parables in the context of criticism from the Pharisees and scribes who were grumbling about Jesus methods and company.
All three parables emphasize the importance of seeking, finding, and restoring hte lost.
It is usually called the parable of the prodigal son.
However, verse 11 identifies it as a man with two sons.
As such it not only teaches us
It’s focal point is not the prodigal son but the prodigal love and grace of the father.
Its uniqueness does not consist in the sons.
We all know people like the rebellious younger son or the resentful older one.
At one time or another, in fact, most of us have been like the one or the other.
But we have never known anyone like the father.
He is the first party named and the last to speak.
None of the problems posed in the parable can be solved without the father.
He is the crucial link.
The parable is about the indomitable love of the Father.
God’s Love and Grace For The Reckless Rebel
Rebellion - vv. 12-16
According to Jewish law, the firstborn son is entitlted to twice the amount given to the other son.
A man with two sons would give 2/3 of his estate to teh first son, and one third to the second.
What is shocking is not the amount but the timing of the request.
Property was typically disposed by a will executed after a father’s death, not by request when he was aliv.
The request shames his father.
It is a public statement that he no longer wishes to live with or be identifeid with the family.
In requesting what should become available only at his father’s death, the son is, in effect, writing his father’s death certificate.
In Jewish society, this is an unforgivable offense.
In effect saying, “To me you are dead.”
The father could have responded variously.
He could have put the young man in his place: “I had to wait until my father was lowered in the ground, and you must too.”
He could have tried appeasement: “If your allowance is not enough, I’ll double it.”
He could have taken a probationary approach: “I’ll give you a half-section of property and see how you do with it.”
He could have appealed to the remaining shreds of his son’s honor: “Don’t subject our family to such disgrace.”
The father has authority to do any of these, but he forsakes them all.
Instead, the father opts to respond in a most surprising way - he divided his property between them - v. 12. Now this is significant as the Greek uses two different words for property in v. 12.
The son asks for ousia - meaning “financial wealth.”
The father shares with him “bios” - one of several Greek words for “life.”
The father does not simply divide his assets; he divides his life.
The deal done, a few days later, the son converted all of his assets into cold, hard cash and set off for a distant country and squandered it all away recklessly - v. 13.
From the world’s point of view he has it made - money, anonymity, distance!
He is living the dream but it was not long before reality set in. due to wasteful pleasures he blew it all.
NExt, his foolish, wasteful living is compounded by forces out of his control - a famine.
The distant far off country, the land of opportunity, suddenly became alien, foreign, far removed from security.
Now to survive he must do that which is repugnant - he chooses a life of slavery in which he feeds pigs.
HIs hunger is so great hat he longs to eat their food.
Though not unheard of, this is a surprising request.
Since the older son got a double portion of his father’s estate, the younger son’s share would have been one-third of the estate.
Having received his share, a few days later he converted all of his assets to cash and set himself headfirst into a life of wasteful living.
Pigs were unclean.
The pods were carob pods seed casings of a tree used as food for cattle, pigs, and sometimes the poor.
Seedpods similar to peapods but much larger.
The point is that the younger son has hit rock bottom in his new life.
He is desperate.
Utterly bankrupt.
The prodigal son is a picture of all sinners who in spite of the rich advantages of having a relationship with God waste their lives in sin and self-indulgence.
Returns - vv. 17-21
Hitting rock bottom can have a very sobering effect and thus we read in v. 17 that the younger brother “came to himself.”
The idea here is he had inner thoughts which led to resolutions to act.
The young man “came to his senses” - v. 17
He had clarity of thought and honest self-appraisal that in his present state he is utterly perishing.
He realizes he is lost.
He resolves to act - v. 18.
His violation had a vertical and horizontal dimension
That is crucial because only the lost can be found.
“But when he came to himself” means repentance.
Repentance means a change of mind.
But this is more than just an intellectual change of mind.
It is change in one’s way of thinking that results in different beliefs and a change in the direction of one’s life.
Repentance is to turn from one’s allegiance to sin and unbelief.
He not only realized the futility of his situation, but he also came to understand his sinfulness against God himself.
Jesus was aware that there are people who are lost, not only in terms of the kingdom of God, but in personal terms: they don’t even know themselves.
A person can get so caught up in a kind of activity that he doesn’t even know who he is any more.
One of the greatest abilities we have as humans is the ability to deceive ourselves, to rationalize, to make up excuses.
Some of us continue to delude ourselves, postponing that painful moment of honest self-evaluation.
But this young man woke up to the reality of what he was doing.
That awakening is, of course, the most critical point in his life.
The image of running, falling on one’s neck, and kissing in forgiveness occurs only once elsewhere in Scripture: in Jacob’s reconciliation with Esau.
The younger son in the parable has offended both father and older brother on the issue of inheritance, as Jacob offended his father (Isaac) and older brother (Esau) on the same issue.
Like Jacob, the younger son faces a day of reckoning: he “comes to himself” and goes back home.
Jacob had reason to fear Esau, whom he defrauded; the younger son has reason to fear his father, whom he disgraced.
Both fears were mistaken.
Esau “ran to meet Jacob and embraced him; he threw his arms around his neck and kissed him” (Gen 33:4).
The description of the reconciliation of Jacob and Esau is unmistakably similar in theme, vocabulary, and syntax to the reconciliation of the younger son and the father.
It is not difficult to imagine that this redemptive key in the parable, perhaps the entire parable itself, was fashioned by Jesus on Jacob’s inimitable meeting with Esau.
So remarkable was Esau’s response that Jacob believed he had seen “the face of God” (Gen 33:10).
So it is with the younger son: both he and Jacob have been accosted by grace, and grace is the face of God.
The son commences his rehearsed speech but the Father cuts him off.
Restored - vv. 22-24
Robe, ring, sandals - all three signify status, reputation, honor and acceptance.
Especially sandals - going barefoot was a sign of humiliation and indignity.
These gestures far exceed the sons needs.
The father’s response displayed compassion, love, acceptance, and celebration.
v. 24 - ties to the previous two parables about God’s joy in saving the lost.
The father’s celebratory attitude depics the way in which God the Father receives repentant sinners.
He is a great and loving savior.
The son doesn’t even get to finish his rehearsed speech.
God’s Love and Grace For The Respectable Rebel
He is a prodigal just in a different way.
His rebellion is more socially acceptable.
He is like Jonah
He is self-centered and doesn’t understand God’s grace
His body stayed at home but his heart was lost
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9