Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.53LIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.29UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.5UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.75LIKELY
Extraversion
0.2UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.5LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.73LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Like most young men, I grew up watching whatever Dad watched and listening to whatever Dad listened to.
That meant I got a lot of talk radio, a lot of news and politics, and a good amount of military movies.
We probably watched Top Gun 50 times over the years (and listened to the soundtrack on repeat).
When I hopped into Dad’s car after he passed away, I turned on the stereo, hit the CD button, and what started playing but “Highway to the Danger Zone” from the Top Gun soundtrack.
The CD is still in there, too.
We watched a lot of military-themed stuff together, not just Top Gun.
And I knew that Dad could answer almost, if not every, question I had.
When watching A Few Good Men several years ago, the end of the movie brought up a question.
During the sentencing, the court officer reads the verdict:
“On the charge of conspiracy to commit murder, the members find the defendants not-guilty.
On conduct unbecoming a United States Marine, the members find the defendants…guilty.”
I questioned Dad: “Conduct unbecoming, huh?”
“They may not be able to make anything else stick,” he answered very matter-of-factly, “but they can always get you on conduct unbecoming.”
The Corinthians Paul is addressing have, it seems, lost sight of the gospel.
In a lot of ways, they’ve reverted to their old way of living.
There’s sexual immorality in their midst (ch.
5).
And now there’s a grievance/a dispute between some of the members.
Comparatively, it doesn’t seem like that big of a deal.
It doesn’t rise to the level of blatant and on-going sexual sin, but it is, at the very least, conduct unbecoming a follower of Jesus.
Their conduct doesn’t match their confession.
They are behaving the way they used to behave; behaving as they did before Jesus transformed them.
This here at the outset of 1 Corinthians 6 is simply more of the same; more of what we saw in 1 Corinthians 5.
Conduct unbecoming the saints/the Lord’s people/the holy ones.
This is what they are—ton hagion, the saints/the Lord’s people/the holy ones.
If we belong to Christ, this is what we are: saints/the Lord’s people/the holy ones.
This is what we are.
Which of those do you prefer?
Okay, saints/God’s people/holy ones, if you have your Bibles (and I hope you do) please turn with me to 1 Corinthians 6.
And if you’re able and willing, please stand with me for the reading of God’s Holy Word.
May the Lord add His blessing to the reading of His Holy Word!
________________
From the beginning verses, we see that it is inconceivable to Paul that a believer would sue another believer.
Paul flabbergasted by the tolerance the church showed the man in chapter 5; here Paul is stunned: “How dare you guys do this!”
In-con-CEIV-able.
And, yes, I do know what that word means.
Paul’s line of reasoning is pretty easy to follow, though some of the details are a little weird to us.
He discusses stuff we don’t think about often or at all.
Saints/Holy Ones, don’t you know that you will judge the world?
When Christ returns and sets the world at rights, His people—the saints, the holy ones—those who belong to Him by faith will reign with Him in His kingdom here on earth.
We will judge the world.
So, Paul reasons, if we—His people—are going to do that, why in the name of Pete would we take a dispute between two Christians before the ungodly for judgment?
Why wouldn’t we let the Lord’s people do the judging?
What’s more (and this is really odd), Paul says, “Don’t you know we’ll judge the angels?!”
This precedes from the last sentence; it builds on the truth that we will judge the world, intensifying what was just said.
So inclusive will be our participation in God’s eschatological (end times) judgment, that not only the world, but even the wicked angels will be judged by the people of God.
Paul’s saying, in essence: “In the end, we will sit in on ultimate judgments—even on angels—which of course means that I don’t even need to mention the fact that we should be able to handle mere matters of business.”
Inconceivable that the church would let the outside world—the dark, sinful, unspiritual world—speak into the life of the church, discipline the church, lead the church, guide the church.
But, boy howdy, it happens.
“Who are they to judge the church?
You all (we) are going to judge them on that great and terrible day.”
“Why in the world would you let the world handle things you can and should handle yourselves?”
Paul’s argument makes a lot of sense.
His line of reasoning makes it really clear that the Corinthians should not be behaving in this way, sloughing off their responsibility on those outside the church.
There’s some shame in this.
Paul intends this to shame them a bit.
They’re acting like there’s nobody qualified to judge a dispute between them, when really, as R.C. Sproul writes:
“Even the least qualified among the Corinthians, since he has received God’s Spirit and wisdom, is in a better position than an unbeliever to arbitrate disputes in the church.”
You see, Christians (saints, the Lord’s people, the holy ones) have a righteousness the world does not have.
And they have a kingdom perspective the world can’t have, uniquely qualifying Christians to handle matters amongst themselves.
Plus, the Church is a family.
Paul’s use of brother should stand out to us.
It’s not merely that one Corinthian is taking another Corinthian to court; it’s that one brother is taking another brother to court.
It’s crazy.
They’re family—a family who should care about the reputation and witness of the church; a family who should protect the reputation and witness of the local church.
And this in front of unbelievers!
If we can’t get along with one another, if we don’t value each other above ourselves, if we drag each other into court, or air our dirty laundry in public, what will the world think of us?
What will the world think of the Church?
What will the world think of Christ?
I’ll tell you: they won’t think much of us; and they probably won’t want anything to do with a follower of Christ.
The world won’t see any need of the church if the church looks and behaves just like them and treats their own worse than the world treats there’s.
The Church is a reflection of Christ, so if we’re petty and argumentative and hostile and hateful, it makes Jesus look...well, petty and argumentative and hostile and hateful—that’s what the world will think of Christ.
Paul’s shaking his head…and this in front of unbelievers.
This is conduct unbecoming the radiant Church of Jesus.
All this reveals something about them:
That disputes within the church would come to lawsuits at all shows the Corinthians’ defeat.
They’re not behaving as they should; this is a really sad place for them to be.
They’ve forgotten love:
They’ve neglected service:
They aren’t listening to Jesus about what to do when wronged, when sued, when oppressed:
The Corinthians are acting like unbelievers rather than like the saints, the Lord’s people, the holy ones—that which God has called them to be.
Paul is pleading with them to see that
There is a Big Difference Between Believers and Unbelievers.
Or there should be, at least.
This difference should extend into every part of the life of the church—corporate and individual, public and private.
Believers have been given new life in Christ Jesus, their sins washed clean by the blood of the Lamb; sins taken away, forgiven, cast into the depths of the sea where the Divine remembers them not.
This is the difference.
It’s not that we’re better than them; it’s that we’ve been transformed.
It’s not that we’re good and they’re bad; it’s that by faith in Jesus, His goodness has been applied to us.
There are two categories: unrighteous and righteous.
Every single person falls into one of those groups.
And the dividing line is Christ.
The Big Difference between believers and unbelievers is Jesus—relation to Him determines which group you belong to: unrighteous or righteous.
See Paul’s statement in verse 9:
“Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the Kingdom of God?”
The word wrongdoers is the same word used for ungodly used in verse 1.
Your Bible might have it translated here in verse 9 as unrighteous—“Do you not know that wrongdoers/the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God?”
Those whose behavior is indistinguishable from the unbelieving world may not be among the saints, the Lord’s people, the holy ones.
It’s like they say: “If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it’s probably not one of the Lord’s people.”
All of these sins were common outside the believing community there in Corinth.
All of these sins are common outside the believing community here and now, and in every age in between.
Those who claim to be Christians and yet live a life of sinfulness indicate that their possession of faith and profession of faith is false and that they have no true place in the kingdom.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9