Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.06UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.05UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.14UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.12UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.23UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.37UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.67LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.27UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.39UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Democracy is as dangerous as it is comfortable
the focus on personal rights over collective good often leads to the greatst confusion and corruption
while it is true that our founders turned to SCR for an awareness of individual rights, it’s also true that 1- there was an historical context that drove them (they weren’t infallible) and 2- teh undamentals of government checks and balances do not necessitae only democracy
Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.
H. L. Mencken
Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.
H. L. Mencken
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
Winston Churchill
Democracy... is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder; and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike.
Plato
Remember where we have been:
1co 10:28-
Note where Paul’s concern was—indivdual rights bend to community benefit
We have a real problem with sorting out freedom in Christ from political independence
1co
Freedom in Christ does not mean freedom from obligation
So here, Paul is concerned with the connection between communion and community
Communion in the church means integrated individuality
When it goes wrong- conflict, bite and devour, strain, drain
When it goes right- build, encourage, nurture, etc
Paul’s recurring sentiment:
BOdy:
Used 35x in 1 Cor—almost as much as in all other of his epistles combined—word repetition is significant in study—it points out theme—and here, doctrinal theme
The repetition of Body reflects God’s heart (jealously guards—sick and dying)
The repetition of Body reinforces the essential message—your faith can’t be isolated from your faith community
Even more—you can’t disrespect teh body without disrespecting the head
Even more still—every God ordained collective needs community-minded involvement (look at how these principles apply to family—in fact, even Paul here can’t get around seeing the family involvement and family parallel
Note “husband” and “wife” language
The church is often stated to be an organism, not an organization
Whatever the case, this is true either way--
Order Creates Health
Democratization kills communion (the preference of the individual over the group;
Often said, “7 last words...” but we have seen only 3--”what about me”
The problem isn’t individuality but individualism
(That’s coming in next chapters)
(it creates winners and losers, drives suspicions (no trust), fosters manipulation (give to get / deal making rather than truth and purity and love—self-centered love; and systematic selfishness, whether people or organizations, then the ensuing jealousy and rivalry)
(it creates
Paul’s remedy for unhealthy individualism is a combination of humility and honor
Corinth—city of wealth—Aphrodite, Apollos- rivaled Athens; had isthmean games—thoroughly greed; then fell until 44AD—Caesar revived, once again important trade etc—in both instances, thorough acient democracy
Cf. opinions like noses...
existing male / fe,ale roles—lost in culture
The city soon became a melting pot for the approximately 500,000 people who lived there at the time of Paul’s arrival.
Merchants and sailors, anxious to work the docks, migrated to Corinth.
Professional gamblers and athletes, betting on the Isthmian games, took up residence.
Slaves, sometimes freed but with no place to go, roamed the streets day and night.
And prostitutes (both male and female) were abundant.
People from Rome, the rest of Greece, Egypt, Asia Minor—indeed, all of the Mediterranean world—relished the lack of standards and freedom of thought that prevailed in the city.
These were the people who eventually made up the Corinthian church.
They had to learn to live together in harmony, although their national, social, economic, and religious backgrounds were very different.
** Subordination is not ethe same as inferiority
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9