Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.82LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.48UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.76LIKELY
Extraversion
0.36UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.61LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.79LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Turn with me to .
The most important questions in life are “who is Jesus?” and, “what are you going to do with the knowledge of who Jesus is?”
A person’s eternal destiny hinges on those two questions.
Most people acknowledge that Jesus was a historical figure; there is certainly enough evidence even from outside of the Bible to prove it.
But there are those who treat Jesus as a legend that became mythological, just as they do Robinhood or King Arthur.
To many folks today Jesus was a great teacher, a gifted healer, a great example, and even a prophet.
But they stop short of saying that He was God in the flesh.
Throughout Matthew’s Gospel account he has presented Jesus as the Messiah, who was in fact the Divine Son of God.
He has demonstrated the divinity of Jesus through miraculous acts that could only be performed by God.
Acts such as raising the dead, healing from a distance simply by speaking the word, walking on the water, feeding the multitudes with food that was virtually created out of nothing.
Matthew has given special emphasis to the teaching of Jesus, who taught with authority unlike the scribes.
From John’s Gospel account it seems to me that Jesus expected His followers to believe in Him because of His teaching.
Yet, He charged those who did not believe in Him as being guilty because they had seen His works and yet did not believe.
Look first at His dealing with the religious leaders who did not believe.
(NASB95PARA)
Now look at what He said to Philip, one of His own apostles.
(NASB95PARA)
Over the course of the next few chapters in Matthew’s Gospel account Jesus focuses primarily on preparing the twelve apostles for ministry.
In the context of today’s passage, we see that Jesus and company have journeyed once again out of Israel and into the Gentile land of Caesarea Philippi.
There Jesus asked the apostles to tell Him who people are saying that He is.
And then He asks who they say that He is.
As we approach this text we are going to look at it in terms of assertions; we will look at the assertions of the spiritually uncommitted, the assertion of the spiritually committed, and finally at the assertion of Christ as He pronounces a blessing on the apostles, and I believe by extension on the church as well.
Let’s read our passage together.
I.
The Assertion of the Spiritually Uncommitted – ()
Commitment is a thing that is lacking in our society today.
People are afraid to commit to anything because they understand that commitment is very costly.
For instance, Gail and I have been unwilling to commit to a two-year cell phone plan.
Instead we have a month to month plan in which we can get out of at any time.
Nowhere is lack of commitment seen any stronger than in the institution of marriage.
Recently someone told me about the problems they were having with health insurance because they were living together and not married.
In jest I told them that I could help them fix that problem.
And they were quick to pipe in that they didn’t believe in marriage.
After all a signature on a piece of paper does not prove one’s commitment.
Or does it?
As we look at our text this morning we are going to focus first on those who were unwilling to commit to the fact that Jesus was the promised Messiah.
The scene takes place in a Gentile area, where once again Jesus had ventured to.
Caesarea Philippi was originally named Paneas after the Greek god Pan, who, according to pagan mythology, was born in a nearby cave.
Caesar Augustus had given the region to Herod the Great, who built a temple in Paneas in honor of the emperor.
Herod son, Philip the tetrarch, inherited the land, greatly enlarged the city, and renamed it after Caesar.
He added the name Philippi both to gain honor for himself and to distinguish this Caesarea from the one on the Mediterranean coast west of Jerusalem.
Caesarea Philippi was located about 25 miles northeast of the Sea of Galilee, and 40 miles southwest of Damascus, on a beautiful plateau near the headwaters of the Jordan River.
A few miles to the north, snow-covered Mount Hermon rose to a height of more than 9,000 feet above sea level.
Being in this place would have offered Jesus and His disciples some relief from the hot weather in Galilee, as well as some respite from the growing contention with the religious leaders of Israel.
This is the third trip that Jesus took into Gentile territory as recorded in .
On this occasion, according to Matthew’s account at least, they finally had some quiet time to themselves.
It could very well be that the relative nearness to what was considered to be the birthplace of Pan, as well as to the temple that was built in Caesar’s honor prompted Jesus to ask His probing questions of the disciples.
Let’s look at Jesus’ first question and the assertions that went with it.
“Who do people say that the Son of Man is?”
The title “Son of Man” was Jesus’ favorite way of referring to Himself.
It originated with the prophecies of Daniel in reference to Messiah.
For Jesus to use this term of Himself it was a bold claim to deity.
Let’s look briefly at the various answer which the disciples provided.
A. John the Baptist
B. Elijah
C. Jeremiah – (; )
D. One of the Prophets
II.
The Assertion of the Spiritually Committed ()
A. Messiah
B. Son of God
III.
The Assertion of Christ ()
A. The Blessing of Spiritual Revelation ()
2. Was this revelation something that just came to him or was it based on a summation of the things he had personally heard and seen as he traveled with Jesus for over two years?
1.
Peter did not gain his understanding of who Jesus is from the popular opinions of the day
2. Was this revelation something that just came to him or was it based on a summation of the things he had personally heard and seen as he traveled with Jesus for over two years?
3. – Blessed is the man … whose delight is in the Law of the LORD, and he mediates on it day and night
This verse marks a crucial stage along that growth in understanding and faith.
Partial as it was (16:21–23), Peter’s firm grasp of the fact that Jesus is the Messiah set him apart from the uncertainty and confusion of the crowd and could only be the result of the Father’s disclosure
3. – Blessed is the man … whose delight is in the Law of the LORD, and he mediates on it day and night
B. The Blessed Builder ()
1. Christ is the builder
2. First mention of “church” in the NT.
a.
The term for church is derived from a term that means “called out from.”
b.
We could spend on a lot of time on this term, but the important thing for us to understand is that we who are believers in Jesus Christ have been called out of spiritual death and called unto spiritual light!
c.
The church is the assembly of the called-out ones.
That means the church is not the building but the people.
d.
The church is the remnant, the sheep of His pasture.
e.
Though related, the church and the kingdom are distinct ideas.
The church relates to people and the kingdom relates to rule or reign.
C. The Blessed Rock ()
1.
Who is the rock?
a) Peter?
b) Christ?
c) The Confession?
d) The revelation?
Because Jesus is the builder in this metaphor it doesn’t seem likely that we are intended to think that He is also the rock.
Either Peter or else the revelation of the Father seems most likely to be the rock which Jesus was referring to.
On Peter’s behalf, we note that this text does not saying anything about a pope being the successor to Peter, and therefore each pope having the authority of Peter, as the Roman church argues.
Rather, the NT does show that Peter is the first to make this formal confession and that his prominence continues in the earliest years of the church ().
MacArthur argues that the revelation of the Father is the rock that Jesus referred to.
“The foundation of the church is the revelation of God given through His apostles, and the Lord of the church is the cornerstone of that foundation.”
(pg.
29, vol. 3)
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9