Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.47UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.93LIKELY
Confident
0.63LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.92LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.88LIKELY
Extraversion
0.06UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.43UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction:
I. God’s Faithfulness (vs.
28)
II.
God’s Foreknowledge (vs.
29a)
III.
God’s Formula (vs.
29b)
IV.
God’s Facilitation (vs.
30)
A. Predestination
B. Calling
C. Justification
Justification Defined
Justification Declared
Justification Dispensed
Look all of the the areas that we have been covering in this wonderful passage, this section is no less as wonderful
Just to think as we have been looking at this portion of Scripture all the way back to verse 28, it is absolutely Grace that makes all of these things possible.
Even in verse 28; because who am I that a Holy God should make me such a promise as to cause everything in my life to work out for my good.
And then to think of all the other benefits of Grace that are seen here for all of those that place their faith in Christ alone.
But then for God to make a sovereign, determined decision to select me to become one of His love gifts to His Son and then work in my life to conform me to the image of Christ, in shear Grace and I will never understand it.
And then to declare me righteous is one thing, but then to dispense that righteousness to me…amazing.
But consider again, a verse that we looked at last time together.
How is it that a Holy God, according to this verse, justify wicked people (which we most certainly are) and still remain Holy?
But yet Paul explicitly says:
How can God justify wicked people and yet not participate in some act of abomination?
How can God we both the just and the justifier?
How can God be both the just and the justifier.
The answer to that question is in the Doctrine of Imputation.
“Sinners who aren’t righteous are counted as righteous and considered as righteous, even though they are not righteous in themselves.
They are counted to be something that is not theirs inherently.”
God’s declarative act of justification is based on His constitutive act of imputation.
“Justification is both declarative and a constitutive act of God’s free grace.
It is constitutive in order that it may be truly declarative.
God must constitute the new relationship as well as declare it to be.
The constitutive act consists in the imputation to us of the obedience and righteousness of Christ.
The obedience of Christ must therefore be regarded as the ground of justification; it is the righteousness which God not only takes into account but reckons to our account when He justifies the ungodly.”
This is a two-fold act; God imputes, that is credits, reckons or counts our sins to Christ and punishes Him in our place, and He imputes Christs’ righteousness to believers and then grants them eternal life in Him.
Now, I want us to understand this, so let me break down both of those statements so that we have a clear understanding of what that truly means.
First, God Imputes our sins to Christ.
Now, in what sense did the Father “make” the Son “sin” on our behalf?
In only one sense: the Father counted Jesus to have committed all the sins of all those who would ever repent and believe in him.
2 Corinthians 5:21
Now, God did not actually make Christ a sinner; it would be blasphemous to suggest that the God-man can actually be made a sinner, for God cannot sin.
Instead, since justification is a legal declaration (as established in the previous section), the Father judicially reckoned Christ to have committed the sins of those for whom he was giving himself as a substitute.
Just as the scapegoat bore the guilt of the sins of Israel as Aaron confessed them over its head ().
This was done in such as a way that Christ actually bore our sins.
And just as the blood of the sin offering was sprinkled on the mercy seat () to propitiate God’s wrath, so Jesus Christ was put fourth as a propitiation by His blood.
Though innumerable sinners will escape divine punishment, no sin will ever go unpunished, for every sin of the elect has been reckoned to Christ and punished in him on the cross.
In this way, divine justice has been satisfied, sin has not merely been swept under the rug; it has been justly punished in a substitute.
Therefore, since the believers sin have been imputed to and punished in Christ, they are not counted against them.
Because they have been counted, or imputed, to Christ, the believer’s sins are not imputed to (or counted against) him.
They are forgiven and covered.
Therefore, the justified believer faces no condemnation (Rom.
8:1, 33–34) but enjoys peace with God (Rom.
5:1) and the sure hope of eternal life (Rom.
8:30; Titus 3:7).
Romans 8:1
MacArthur, J., & Mayhue, R. (Eds.).
(2017).
Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth (p.
615).
Wheaton, IL: C
Second, God imputes Christ’s Righteousness to us.
But the forgiveness of sins does not exhaust God’s work in justification.
In fact, if the only benefit believers received in justification were the forgiveness of our sins, we could not be saved.
The old Sunday school definition of justification—“just as if I’d never sinned”—is inadequate, because salvation is not merely a matter of sinlessness or innocence but is also a matter of righteousness (Matt.
5:20, 48).
The law of God, which man broke, thereby incurring the death penalty (Rom.
6:23), carries both positive demands and penal sanctions.
That is to say, God’s law requires both (1) that his creatures perform certain duties suitable to his righteousness and (2) that they undergo a certain punishment if they fail to perform those duties.
Man has failed to do both.
We do not live lives of perfect righteousness, walking in obedience to God in all things, loving him with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength, and loving our neighbors as ourselves.
Neither could we pay the penalty that our disobedience demands without perishing eternally in hell.
Therefore, if we are to be saved, our substitute must not only pay our penalty by absorbing the wrath of God against our sin but must also obey all the positive demands of the law that were required of us.
This twofold nature of Christ’s substitutionary work is sometimes referred to as his passive obedience and active obedience.
The law of God has both penal sanctions and positive demands.
It demands not only the full discharge of its precepts but also the infliction of penalty for all infractions and shortcomings.
It is this twofold demand of the law of God which is taken into account when we speak of the active and passive obedience of Christ.
Christ as the vicar of his people came under the curse and condemnation due to sin and he also fulfilled the law of God in all its positive requirements.
In other words, he took care of the guilt of sin and perfectly fulfilled the demands of righteousness.
He perfectly met both the penal and the preceptive requirements of God’s law.
The passive obedience refers to the former and the active obedience to the latter
Without the positive provisions of righteousness, forgiveness would leave us in a state of mere innocence or moral neutrality; just as Adam was before the fall—reckoned as never having sinned, but as never having obeyed either.
For this reason, scripture speaks of the justified sinner being counted righteous as well as being forgiven.
In fact, we see imputed righteousness all the way back in the book of Genesis with Abraham.
In the book of Romans, Paul substantiates his argument for justification on the basis of imputed righteousness.
With respect to justification, then, God not only satisfies the penal demands of the law by imputing our sin to Christ and punishing him in our place but also satisfies the positive demands of the law by imputing Christ’s righteousness to us.
In summary, in Christ we have a substitute who has both paid our penalty and achieved our righteousness.
Christ provided forgiveness by atoning for our sins on the cross.
Just as our sins were reckoned to his account when he died on the cross, in the same manner his righteousness is counted as ours.
His perfect righteousness is thus the ground on which we stand before God.
Sinners are not justified because of some good thing in them; God can declare us righteous—he can justify the ungodly and yet remain just—because he graciously imputes to us the perfect righteousness of his own dear Son.
Thus, the sole ground of justification is the righteousness of Christ counted to be ours as a gift by grace alone
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9