Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.6LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.38UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.6LIKELY
Extraversion
0.11UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.15UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.66LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Lord Jesus Christ is described as his people’s shepherd in three ways.
In John 10:11 and 14 he is “the good shepherd,” who gives his life for his sheep.
In Hebrews 13:20 he is “that great Shepherd,” who has risen from the dead and lives now to direct his people in every good work.
In 1 Peter 5:4 he is “the Chief Shepherd,” who has ascended into heaven from whence he will one day return to reward the undershepherds of the church who have been faithful to him.
It has been pointed out that Psalms 22, 23, and 24 show a progression similar to those passages.
Psalm 22 is the song of the dying Shepherd, crying out to the Father from the cross.
Psalm 23 is the song of the risen Shepherd, guiding his sheep through life’s dark wilderness.
Psalm 24 is the song of the ascended Shepherd who will reward those who have served faithfully.
It is possible that some may find this pattern a bit forced, of course, particularly in regard to the last two psalms.
But there can be no doubt that it applies strikingly to the twenty-second psalm.
For Psalm 22 is the “Psalm of the Cross,” the best description in all the Bible of Jesus Christ’s crucifixion.
Shavuot -
The festival of Shavuot occurs in late spring, 50 days after the beginning of Passover.
Literally meaning “weeks,” which reflects the seven weeks of the counting of the Omer that separate it from Passover, Shavuot is sometimes translated into English as “Pentecost” (the 50th day).
It is observed on the Sixth of Sivan (plus the Seventh in the Diaspora).
Coming at the end of the barley harvest and the beginning of the wheat crop, one biblical name for Shavuot is Hag ha-Katzir (Harvest Festival).
The festival is also known as Yom ha-Bikkurim (Day of the First Fruits), when joyful pilgrims would march to Jerusalem to offer up baskets of their first ripe fruits and bread baked from the newly harvested wheat (Bik.
3:2–4).
In Temple times, two loaves of bread were “waved before the Lord” on Shavuot (Lev.
23:17–20), the only meal offering baked with leaven (hametz).
Menachem Leibtag suggested that whereas unleavened bread (matzah) symbolizes the initial stage of a process, the fully risen hametz symbolizes its completion.
Bringing the leavened loaves on Shavuot may indicate that the giving of the Torah at Mount Sinai on that date should be understood as the culmination of the process of redemption from slavery that began on Passover, when only matzah could be consumed.
Just as the two loaves marked the staple of our physical existence, so the historical process that began with the Exodus from Egypt and culminated with the giving of the Torah reflected the essence of our spiritual existence.
In the synagogue, it is traditional to read the Book of Ruth on Shavuot, because the story takes place at harvest time (Ruth 2:23).
As a proselyte, Ruth accepted the Torah just as did the Israelites at Mount Sinai.
This is evidenced in her name, which has a numerical value of 606—the difference between the commandments observed by Jews (613) and those incumbent on all nations of the world (the seven Noahide laws).
Ruth also was the great-grandmother of King David (Ruth 4:17), who is closely associated with the festival (see above).
In Ashkenazic synagogues, Akdamut (see below), a long medieval Aramaic piyyut, is usually chanted after the first aliyah has been called but before the Torah reading begins.
The Sephardic tradition is to recite a piyyut by ibn Gabirol called Azharot, which lists the 613 commandments in the Torah.
It is customary to adorn the synagogue with plants and flowers.
In addition to Shavuot being a harvest festival, this practice may relate to the image of the Torah as a Tree of Life (Prov.
3:18); to the legend that Mount Sinai was once a “green mountain” with trees and shrubs, as implied by the phrase “neither shall the flocks and the herds graze” (Exod.
34:3);
Dairy foods are traditionally eaten during Shavuot.
According to legend, upon learning the laws of kashrut at Sinai, the Israelites understood that their pots were not kosher and thus resolved to eat only uncooked dairy foods until they could get new ones.
Some people eat dairy foods containing honey because the Torah is likened to milk and honey in the verse, “Honey and milk are under your tongue” (Song 4:11).
In addition, in the Torah the law of the first fruits (offered at the Temple on Shavuot) is placed next to the biblical prohibition against boiling a kid in its mother’s milk (Exod.
23:19).
Another explanation is that the Israelites exposed for the first time to the wondrous world of Torah were like newborns; just as babies drink only milk, so Jews commemorate the moment at Sinai by drinking and eating only dairy foods.
In gematria, the numerical value of the Hebrew word “halav” (milk) equals 40, corresponding to the number of days Moses spent on Mount Sinai receiving the Torah.
A popular Shavuot dish among Ashkenazim is because one of the names for Mount Sinai was Har Gavnunim, which is derived from the Hebrew word “gevinah” (cheese).
In some communities, it is customary to eat triangular dumplings (kreplach) stuffed with cheese—because the Torah, which consists of three parts (Five Books of Moses, Prophets, and Writings), was given by God in the third month through Moses, who was the third child of his parents, to a people that is divided into three groups (Kohen, Levite, and Israelite).
In some communities, the challot baked for Shavuot are long and have four corners, symbolizing the four methods of interpreting the Torah.
The Lord Jesus Christ is described as his people’s shepherd in three ways.
The Lord Jesus Christ is described as his people’s shepherd in three ways.
In and 14 he is “the good shepherd,” who gives his life for his sheep.
In he is “that great Shepherd,” who has risen from the dead and lives now to direct his people in every good work.
In he is “the Chief Shepherd,” who has ascended into heaven from whence he will one day return to reward the undershepherds of the church who have been faithful to him.
It has been pointed out that , , and 24 show a progression similar to those passages.
is the song of the dying Shepherd, crying out to the Father from the cross.
is the song of the risen Shepherd, guiding his sheep through life’s dark wilderness.
is the song of the ascended Shepherd who will reward those who have served faithfully.
It is possible that some may find this pattern a bit forced, of course, particularly in regard to the last two psalms.
But there can be no doubt that it applies strikingly to the twenty-second psalm.
For is the “Psalm of the Cross,” the best description in all the Bible of Jesus Christ’s crucifixion.[1]
[1] Boice, J. M. (2005).
: An Expositional Commentary (p.
191).
Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
When Jesus spoke this from the cross, did the father actually forsake him, tradition suggests that the father turned his back on the son because he was taking on the full penalty for sin....Is this what is actually going on?
I want to address a common misinterpretation of the word forsaken.
Our English word “forsake” means to renounce or turn away from entirely.
However, the Strong’s Greek Dictionary defines the Greek word “egkataleipo” (the word we translate “forsake”) as meaning “to leave behind in some place, i.e. (in a good sense) let remain over, or (in a bad one) to desert:–forsake, leave.”
“Leaving behind” could not mean any type of break or division in the essence of the Father and Son.
We must be careful in thinking of any type of separation that includes a division in the unity that Jesus has with the Father.
The unity between Father and Son could not have been broken at that time, not even for the shortest moment of time, nor could it have been broken.
Their union was, is, and always will be eternal and without any type of separation.
Since we cannot fully understand the full nature of God, it is no surprise that we cannot fully understand what took place when Jesus cried out on the cross.
The psalms are written in Hebrew and the Hebrew word, translated in English as “forsaken,” is “azab.”
Strong’s Dictionary defines it as: to loosen, i.e. relinquish, permit, etc.:–commit self, fail, forsake, fortify, help, leave (destitute, off), refuse, surely.
There’s no division or separation suggested by the Hebrew word.
I suggest that when Jesus cried out, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” from , He was continuing to teach and minister to those at the foot of the cross.
What is the pattern of the words spoken at the cross and when they were spoken?
We can best profit from our study if we have the main events in mind.
Jesus had been arrested the previous night and had been kept under guard in the house of the high priest in order to be tried formally by the Sanhedrin in the morning.
When day dawned he was quickly tried, convicted of blasphemy, and then taken to Pilate’s Jerusalem residence for sentencing, since the Jewish court was unable to carry out the death penalty while Rome ruled Palestine.
There were unexpected delays with Pilate.
But at last his judgment was secured, and Jesus was led through the streets of the city to Golgotha bearing his cross.
What was he thinking of?
He seems to have been thinking of other people.
When Jesus saw the women weeping after him he said, “Do not weep for me; weep for yourselves and for your children,” and he prophesied of the terrible days to come (Luke 23:28–31).
When the soldiers drove the nails through his hands and feet to affix him to the rough wooden cross he prayed, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing” (Luke 23:34).
He had words for the dying thief: “I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43).
He entrusted his mother to John’s safekeeping, saying, “Dear woman, here is your son,” and to John, “Here is your mother” (John 19:26–27).
In none of these sentences did Jesus seem to be thinking of himself at all.
He was thinking entirely of others.
This changed at noon.
At noon a great darkness came over the land which lasted until three o’clock.
The darkness was sent by the Father to shield Jesus during the hours he was made sin for us.
These were private hours.
It is as if God had shut the bronze doors of heaven upon Jesus so that what transpired during those hours happened between himself and Jesus alone.
What was Jesus thinking of during these three hours?
There is no reason why we should have to know this, of course.
God could have kept silent about it.
But there are three important clues in the New Testament accounts.
If Jesus is reflecting on , what might verse 6 bring us to conclude?
The normal word used for Worm is rimmah, but that is not what is used here, take a look at some other places the word (tolaat) used here appears....
, , , , , , ,
What meanings have we discovered about this word?
Remember Hebrew is a broad paintbrush and words can have multiple meanings.
Meanings can also be drawn from the same concrete source.
Here maybe we can see another example of how the heavens and earth declare the glory of God.
You will find it used as a scarlet yarn that was used in the crafting of the High Priest’s garments to be worn for ministering in the Holy Place, the curtains and other fabrics of the tabernacle, it was also used in the coverings of things inside of the tabernacle.
The worm that we see in the text as well is believed to be a worm known as coccus ilicis or nicknamed the Crimson or Scarlet Worm.
Encyclopedia Britannica says this about this worm...
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9