Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.16UNLIKELY
Joy
0.61LIKELY
Sadness
0.54LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.69LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.01UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.69LIKELY
Extraversion
0.19UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.09UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.76LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
“The essence of Christian theology is grace, and the essence of Christian ethics is gratitude.”
The legalist isolates the law from the God who gave the law.
He is not so much seeking to obey God or honor Christ as he is to obey rules that are devoid of any personal relationship.
There’s no love, joy, life, or passion.
It’s a rote, mechanical form of law-keeping that we call externalism.
The legalist focuses only on obeying bare rules, destroying the broader context of God’s love and redemption in which He gave His law in the first place.
To understand the second type of legalism, we must remember that the New Testament distinguishes between the letter of the law (its outward form) and the spirit of the law.
The second form of legalism divorces the letter of the law from the spirit of the law.
It obeys the letter but violates the spirit.
There’s only a subtle distinction between this form of legalism and the one previously mentioned.
How does one keep the letter of the law but violate its spirit?
Suppose a man likes to drive his car at the minimum required speed irrespective of the conditions under which he is driving.
If he is on an interstate and the minimum posted speed is forty miles per hour, he drives forty miles per hour and no less.
He does this even during torrential downpours, when driving at this minimum required speed actually puts other people in danger because they have had the good sense to slow down and drive twenty miles an hour so as not to skid off the road or hydroplane.
The man who insists on a speed of forty miles per hour even under these conditions is driving his car to please himself alone.
Although he appears to the external observer as one who is scrupulous in his civic obedience, his obedience is only external, and he doesn’t care at all about what the law is actually all about.
This second kind of legalism obeys the externals while the heart is far removed from any desire to honor God, the intent of His law, or His Christ.
This second type of legalism can be illustrated by the Pharisees who confronted Jesus over healing on the Sabbath day (Matt.
12:9–14).
They were concerned only with the letter of the law and avoiding anything that might look like work to them.
These teachers missed the spirit of the law, which was directed against ordinary labor that is not required to maintain life and not against efforts to heal the sick.
The third type of legalism adds our own rules to God’s law and treats them as divine.
It is the most common and deadly form of legalism.
Jesus rebuked the Pharisees at this very point, saying, “You teach human traditions as if they were the word of God.”
We have no right to heap up restrictions on people where He has no stated restriction.
Each church has a right to set its own policies in certain areas.
For example, the Bible says nothing about soft drinks in the church’s fellowship hall, but a church has every right to regulate such things.
But when we use these human policies to bind the conscience in an ultimate way and make such policies determinative of one’s salvation, we venture dangerously into territory that is God’s alone.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9