Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.46UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.71LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.2UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.96LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.52LIKELY
Extraversion
0.07UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.54LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.58LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Trinity
Scripture is emphatically clear: there is only one God, and He is one (, , , , , , , , , , ).
With equal clarity God reveals His existence in the unity of the Godhead (, ).
That is that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit exist in the triune Godhead as distinct persons (, , , ), yet with one substance (, , , , , ) and that they therefore are co-equal () and co-eternal.
This is the essence of the Trinity.
If we, with human eyes, are unable to fully comprehend this inestimable mystery, it is not an indictment of its theological truth, but rather a reality of the limitations of our nature.
We may not unblinking stare into the brilliance of our sun, and we certainly are unable to gaze deeply into the revelation of the Trinity, with its blinding, divine, and glorious light.
Error to Avoid: Modalism
Modalism- the belief that God does not exist as three distinct persons within the triune Godhead, but instead asserts that God merely reveals Himself in three different forms (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) as He wills.
Such a view is definitively unbiblical, and therefore heretical, diminishing the persons of God into mere masks that He both dons and discards at will.
Modalism puts its adherents into the frightful position of being simultaneously idolatrous (holding to a view of God less than who He is and inconsistent with His self-revelation) and blasphemous (it demonstrates an intellectual contempt for God in the way He has revealed Himself).
God the Son
The Person of Christ:
1.
The Two Natures: Human and Divine
What it means:
Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God and second person of the trinity necessarily posses the full nature of divinity (), as He is of one substance with the other persons of the Godhead (, ) .
Christ Himself testifies to His own divinity(, , , ), as do the Father (, , , ) and the Spirit () in addition to the prophets () and apostles ().
Through the mystery of the incarnation (God became man by virgin birth) (, ), Christ subjected Himself to the Father by being made fully man(, ), for the purpose of our righteousness by His sacrificial obedience (, ), and yet did so without compromising, suspending, or forfeiting His divine nature.
In short Christ was,is, and will be forevermore, both fully God, and fully man.
a) The Divinity of Christ
Where we find it:
, , ,
, , , , ,
,
What it means:
In order for us to receive salvation, Christ must be fully God, for without His divine nature He would be unable to overcome sin and death.
Further, the ability to forgive sins is the divine right of the One whose holiness sin offends.
Consider Peter’s magnificient evangelistic sermon in , in which he affirms the legitimacy of Christ’s finished work as savior on the basis:
› Scripture is emphatically clear: there is only one God, and He is one (, , , , , , , , , , ).
With equal clarity God reveals His existence in the unity of the Godhead (, ).
That is that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit exist in the triune Godhead as distinct persons (, , , ), yet with one substance (, , , , , ) and that they therefore are co-equal () and co-eternal.
This is the essence of the Trinity.
of God’s attesting of His power manifested in Christ through miracles (2:22)
of the inability of death to hold Christ (2:24)
that David prophesied that the Father would exalt Christ to His the heavenly throne (2:25-33)
that God has made Jesus both Lord and Christ (2:34-36) (see also: , , )
Additionally, God alone has the power to forgive sins, a reality the scribes understood when they thought Christ blasphemous for doing so in .
Yet Christ did do so (), and forgiveness of sin is possible through faith in His blood alone (, ).
“Q: Why must the Redeemer be truly God?
A: That because of his divine nature his obedience and suffering would be perfect and effective; and also that he would be able to bear the righteous anger of God against sin and yet overcome death.”-
New City Catechism
A: That because of his divine nature his obedience and suffering would be perfect and effective; and also that he would be able to bear the righteous anger of God against sin and yet overcome death.
The great love of God could never be more clearly manifested than by God the Son Himself taking on the form of man and offering Himself as the sacrifice for our sin.
If Christ were simply a man, than His death would hardly be of greater cost to God than the death of any of the prophets or saints.
Yet God is said to demonstrate the great depth of His love for us uniquely in the offering of His Son (, ).
There will be a fuller discussion of the love of God revealed in the incarnation in the section titled “The Humanity of Christ.”
The divinity of Christ firmly establishes His Lordship over all things, commanding our love, worship, and obedience.
Lest we think that Christ was a man alone, and not God the Son, the writer of Hebrews (by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit) sets as his thesis the preeminence of Christ over all.
Christ is a greater leader than Moses ()
Christ is a greater high priest ()
Christ is greater than angels ()
Christ is the express image of the person of God () (see also: , )
Therefore, for the glory of His person, and for His obedience to the Father’s will, God the Father has given to God the Son all authority (, , ,
Our response to Christ must reflect the reality that He is not merely our Savior, deserving our faith and praise, but He is also our Lord, deserving our obedience and glory.
Common questions to consider:
Jesus, while he may have been a good moral teacher, was most definitely not God.
He did not think of himself as God, nor did his disciples or early followers.
Instead the supposed divinity of Christ is a modern tradition of the church.
While the popularity of opinions such as these continues to grow, it demonstrates a profound animosity to the revelation of God in Scripture, and a dishonest assessment of the teachings of Christ, His apostles, and of Scripture as a whole.
Christ’s birth is presented in the gospels as the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophetic word “Immanuel” (God with us).
(, )
On numerous occasions the religious leaders understood Christ to be making statements or preforming actions that must be considered blasphemous if not done by God Himself (, , ).
The words of Christ himself, both in his earthly ministry (, -25, , ) and in the Revelation given to John (, , ) make clear His divine nature and incommunicable attributes.
Any depiction of Christ as a “good moral teacher” that denies His divinity is incoherent, as Christ would then have either been lying about His Lordship, or was crazy.
“I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God.
That is the one thing we must not say.
A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher.
He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell.
You must make your choice.
Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse.
You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher.
He has not left that open to us.
He did not intend to.” -C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God.
Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God.
That is the one thing we must not say.
A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things
That is the one thing we must not say.
A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things
Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher.
He would either be a lunatic — on the level with
Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher.
He would either be a lunatic — on the level with
the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell.
You must make
the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell.
You must make
your choice.
Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something
your choice.
Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something
worse.
You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can
worse.
You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can
fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense
fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense
about his being a great human teacher.
He has not left that open to us.
He did not intend to.”
about his being a great human teacher.
He has not left that open to us.
He did not intend to.”
-C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9