Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.52LIKELY
Sadness
0.58LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.75LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.36UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.69LIKELY
Extraversion
0.38UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.59LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Last week we talked about the Bereans and how they studied the scriptures to make sure that what Paul and Silas were telling them was actually true.
And we talked about how we should emulate the example of these Berean believers.
Everything we hear from the pulpit, or read in a book, or discuss in a conversation with friends, should be verified against the truth of scripture.
But as usual in the life of the early church, when the gospel was preached to a new area, controversy arose.
At the end of our passage last week we saw the Jews from Thessalonica had followed Paul and Silas and Timothy to Berea and they agitated the crowds so the believers sent Paul on while Silas and Timothy stayed on there in Berea.
The very last verse we read last week said.
INTRODUCTION
So that’s where we’ve left Paul.
Alone in Athens waiting for Silas and Timothy to join him.
But before we get into reading the passage for this week:
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
1.
In Acts so far we have seen several examples of gospel preaching.
a.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9