Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.79LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.33UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.79LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.55LIKELY
Extraversion
0.1UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.37UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.4UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
TEXT: Eccl.
1:1-11
Illustration: Waking up students with cold water at camp
No one really likes or wants a wake up call.
The alarm always seems so rude.
“Wake up Call” = a person or thing that causes people to become fully alert to an unsatisfactory situation and to take action to remedy it
So we are going to be getting some wake up calls.
In the book of Ecclesiastes we get several wake up calls that alerts us to reality and challenges us to make a change.
Ecclesiastes: a strange book, seemingly morbid, some have wondered why its in the Bible at all
Written by Solomon, a part of wisdom literature (doesn’t talk about redemptive plan but gives practical advice for living in redemption)
Gives us Solomon’s self experiment—see if it is possible to find meaning and fulfillment in this life (“under the sun”—30x’s =life without God)
In the book of Ecclesiastes, Solomon gives us a harsh challenge to really consider what our lives are about.
He conducts an experiment in his life to find out what it's all really about.
And in the end, he uses himself as a personal guinea pig in order to teach what life is really about.
Why?
Because he knows how easy it is to just live our lives, busying ourselves to the point where we never really ask the tough questions.
First Wake Up Call: All of Life is Vanity … and if so, how should we live?
All of Life is Defined by Vanity
Ecc.
1:2
​What is he saying here?
It’s important because he uses this word 38 times in twelve chapters.
Many translations say “meaningless”.
This sounds like what you may have heard in your freshman philosophy class.
That life is all there is.
All we know is what we can observe and measure (call empiricism).
So therefore there is no meaning beyond this life as we know it.
This in fact the the story of modern western thought … 1) no God 2) all we know is this life 3) no meaning so we need to create it [we’ll get to this later]
And Ecclesiastes certainly speaks to this philosophy.
But Solomon is saying something simpler, more practical.
“Vanity” here is the work hevel in the Hebrew.
It comes from the word breath, wind, vapor.
So the term “vanity” is better than “meaningless”
Def.
Vanity-can mean “inflated pride in oneself or one's appearance” but also can refer to someone that relies on empty things like appearance or reputation.
Vanity points to ...
Life is short —Ps.
39:5-6; 11
a vapor or whiff of smoke … doesn’t last long at all
Life is Elusive
Illustration: smoke rings … can’t grab it
Life is repetitious & monotonous
Eccl.
1:6-10
Life is profitless --- something left over
Eccl.
1:3-4 “What does a man gain by all the toil …?
Answer .... there isn’t any.
We will die and leave everything we’ve done behind
Eccl.
1:11
Solomon “sketches humankind’s place on the canvas of the entire universe to show, in graphic terms, just how and why there is nothing to be gained.
I leave only one thing behind, and that’s the earth I used to live on, remaining right where it was when I first arrived, only now it spins without me.”
Our Lives Should be Informed by Vanity
So in light of this, how should we live?
This is Solomon’s goal.
To help us consider how we will live.
Western secular philosophy has attempted to answer this question.
1) Humanist—make this world a better place—forgotten
2) Hedonist—just feel good and have fun—doesn’t last
3) Existentialist—live a moral, good life in the face of meaninglessness—who decides good, moral?
But here’s the thing, Solomon isn’t talking to modern secularists .... he’s talking to God’s people
Here’s the question then: are we are virtually doing the same thing?
Are we ignoring the reality that life is actually just a breath?
Are we busying ourselves, striving, toiling, and deep down hoping we can make this life what we think it should be?
Illustration: Matrix: Red Pill or the Blue Pill
Solomon wants us to let the reality of our short life and death sink into our bones and lodge deep into our hearts.
So Solomon asks the question: “What does man gain by all the toil at which he toils under the sun?”
Is there?
The good news is that, Yes, there can be “gain”.
This is the good news of the gospel.
1 Cor.
15:56-58
And we are also told that “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”
(Romans 8:28)
Tim Keller makes a good point that either every moment in this life means something or every moment means nothing.
The good news of the gospel is that God somehow redeems every moment in our lives.
Conclusion
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9