Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.22UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.57LIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.58LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.31UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.85LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.87LIKELY
Extraversion
0.05UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.73LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.73LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Retaliation
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’
39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil.
But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
40 And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.
41 And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
42 Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.
We’ve now reached Jesus’ fifth teaching concerning the law of God as he endeavors to rightly explain the meaning and intention of God’s law, particularly, on subjects that had often been distorted by the oral traditions and teachings of the religious leaders in Israel.
This time Jesus addresses the teaching of the rabbis that had stemmed from the OT teaching, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.”
Equitable Justice
In the OT we see this phrase used at least three times in the books of Exodus, Leviticus and Deuteronomy.
In all three instances the phrase is used to express the Biblical command for equitable justice.
Or to put it another way, this phrase was used to communicate that justice ought to be fair.
While many often point to the OT and remark of its harshness, instead what we find is a justice system that is remarkably fair.
If we were to require a punishment for a crime that exceeded the severity of that crime we would have an unequitable or unfair justice system.
We read in ,
22 “When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman’s husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23 But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
Similarly in we read,
17 “Whoever takes a human life shall surely be put to death.
18 Whoever takes an animal’s life shall make it good, life for life.
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, as he has done it shall be done to him, 20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; whatever injury he has given a person shall be given to him.
21 Whoever kills an animal shall make it good, and whoever kills a person shall be put to death.
22 You shall have the same rule for the sojourner and for the native, for I am the LORD your God.”
What we have here are hypothetical cases where the OT scriptures emphasis over and over again that the punishment or payment exacted against the offender ought never to exceed the severity of the crime committed.
Lamech is vengeful and unfair
This is important because the sinful propensity of mankind is often to exact punishments that are greater in severity than the crimes committed.
And if you’ll remember, one of the descendents of Cain in Genesis was a man by the name of Lamech, and in he brags to his two wives of how much more vengeful he was than Cain.
23 Lamech said to his wives:
“Adah and Zillah, hear my voice;
you wives of Lamech, listen to what I say:
I have killed a man for wounding me,
a young man for striking me.
24  If Cain’s revenge is sevenfold,
then Lamech’s is seventy-sevenfold.”
Lamech was not carrying out justice, he was vengeful and unfair.
Lamech was not carrying out justice, he was vengeful and unfair.
Religious leaders permit personal vengeance
Which leads us to Jesus’ point in Matthew.
What the religious leaders in Israel had done was give license to the people to seek personal vengeance as long as their vengeance was perceived to be fair, or equitable.
But this isn’t how the texts in Exodus and Leviticus were meant to be used.
They were not guidelines for personal retaliation or vengeance, they were guidelines for the justice system of Israel.
They were principles that judges were to follow when making judgments.
It’s why Jesus says,
39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil.
But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Jesus is talking about personal ethics
Jesus isn’t saying that the justice system should be done away with, no, he’s not talking about the justice system at all.
He’s teaching his disciples how they ought to respond when an offense has been committed against them personally.
He’s talking about personal ethics.
Do not resist the one who is evil
The one who has commited evil against us is not to be resisted, not to be opposed, or retaliated against, rather we are to patiently endure the the injuries we receive.
More than that, we’re to strive to even forget the wrongs committed against us so that we aren’t inclined to break out against others in hatred and injury.
Paul’s letter to the Romans is helpful for us to see what it is Jesus means here.
Turn with me to starting in verse 17,
17 Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all.
18 If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.
19 Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.”
20 To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.”
21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
14 Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them.
15 Rejoice with those who rejoice, weep with those who weep.
16 Live in harmony with one another.
Do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly.
Never be wise in your own sight.
17 Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all.
18 If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.
19 Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.”
20 To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.”
21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
Do not repay evil for evil
Notice the beginning of verse 17 again, “repay no one evil for evil”, that’s at the heart of what Jesus is saying here.
He is teaching his disciples, and by extension us, that we are not permitted to take justice into our own hands, instead that’s the job of the judicial system and ultimately God himself.
When we are slandered, ridiculed or treated unfairly our job is never to repay evil with evil.
Our job is to patiently endure, not to resist, not to retaliate.
Which is exactly the example our Lord sets for us.
When he was being spit upon, ridiculed, and afflicted by his accusers during his crucifixion he was as Isaiah writes,
7  He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,
yet he opened not his mouth;
like a lamb that is led to the slaughter,
and like a sheep that before its shearers is silent,
so he opened not his mouth.
And we ought to follow in the footsteps of our Lord.
Turn the other cheek
Jesus uses the analogy of someone striking us on the right cheek and then us offering up our other cheek so as to be struck again.
Notice that Jesus specifically says “the right cheek” and not the left.
Most people are right-handed, and in order for most people to slap someone on the right cheek the slap would have to be back-handed.
Such an action is an ancient gesture of insult, even today there’s a perceived difference when someone strikes another with the back of their hand as opposed to the palm of their hand.
So Jesus is talking here about insult and slander, that if we are slandered, rather than retaliating, we we ought to again make ourselves vulnerable to slander.
It isn’t that we’re searching out slander or insult but as Jesus says here that we are not resist it - we are not to retaliate.
We are to be a submissive people, a people willing to patiently endure insult.
Hard teaching
This is probably one of the hardest teachings from the mouth of our Lord, but I want you to think about Jesus’ crucifixion for a moment.
If there’s anyone in all the world who has the right to open his mouth in the midst of the wicked affliction of his accusers, it’s Jesus.
He’s God in the flesh, very God of very God, the creator of the universe, sovereign over all, yet he submitted himself to his Father’s will despite the pain and injustice it would require him to endure.
So in the same way we ought to trust in the promise that God will one day make everything right, that there will be vindication for the righteous, that the wicked will be judged and held accountable.
God is indeed a just God and will not abide forever with the injustices that plague our world.
Vengeance is mine!
I will repay.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9