Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.18UNLIKELY
Joy
0.47UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.54LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.64LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.58LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.72LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.77LIKELY
Extraversion
0.15UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.65LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.73LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Last week we talked about Philip’s witness in Samaria.
This is the beginning of the second phase of Jesus mission to the church.
The gospel has moved out of Jerusalem and is going to other areas of the country.
It’s reaching other people besides the core of the Jewish faith in Jerusalem.
Our passage this week will show us that spread of the gospel going even further.
It’s still reaching people who follow the Jewish faith, but it’s beginning to spread even further away.
So let’s start reading with verse 26 of chapter 8.
Now let’s stop right there for just a minute.
Acts 8:26-30Now let’s stop right there for just a minute.
Now let’s stop right there for just a minute.
This passage starts off with an angel telling Philip to get up and go south to the road from Jerusalem to Gaza.
Now as always there’s a debate among biblical scholars about whether the angel spoke to Philip in Samaria or if Philip left with the apostles in verse 25 and traveled back to Jerusalem.
They make arguments on both sides and I’m sure they are all very well researched and very well written, but my question to all of these arguments is “Why does it matter?”
Does it make any difference to the story whether Philip was still in Samaria or if he had already returned to Jerusalem?
About the only difference I can think of is that the journey to the Gaza road would have taken less time if he was already in Jerusalem.
Now let’s stop right there for just a minute.
But you know this is the problem too often in life.
Just like these scholars focused on where Philip started out we often focus too much on where we came from.
We think, God can’t use me because I used to go out to bars every weekend, or I used to lie, or I used to steal, or whatever it was that we used to do.
We focus on the past instead of the future.
Now don’t get me wrong, the past is important.
I’m sure we’ve all heard the phrase, “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
The actual quote comes from the philosopher George Santayana and it goes, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
So knowing history, knowing our past is important, but even Santayana was only looking at the past as a bridge to a better future, one in which the mistakes of the past are not repeated.
I think what we need to focus on more here in this passage is the beginning of the next verse.
Verse 27 starts off with the sentence, “So he got up and went.”
This passage is not about where Philip was coming from.
It’s not even really about where he was going.
It’s about his obedience to the call of God and what that obedience led to.
Philip obeyed the voice of God when the angel told him to go down to the Gaza road.
Notice, the angel didn’t give him a reason.
He didn’t tell him that he would be meeting an Ethiopian official.
He didn’t say anything about why he was telling him to go or what he would do when he got there.
But Philip went anyway.
He didn’t question, he didn’t complain or bargain or come up with a thousand reasons why he should go somewhere else instead.
He just got up and he went.
He was obedient to the voice of God, and God honored that obedience.
What about us?
I ask this question pretty regularly in here but let me ask it again, “What is God calling you to do?” God has a plan and a purpose for each and every one of us.
Like I’ve said before, He doesn’t always show us the whole plan, in fact, rarely does He show us the whole plan because He knows that we wouldn’t be able to handle it.
He typically only shows us a very small part of His plan for our lives.
He tells us something along the lines of “Get up and go south to the road that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.”
Or maybe he says “Go back to school to finish your degree.”
That’s one I heard a few years back after I got out of the Army and it led to another degree and another and eventually to me standing here in front of you today.
Or maybe it’s as simple as, “Go next door and say hello to that new family that just moved in.”
That simple act of saying hello might lead to a wonderful friendship, or more importantly it might lead to the opportunity to share the gospel with someone and change their lives forever.
The key is not how big or how small we think the thing that God is calling us to do is, the key is there at the beginning of verse 27, “So he got up and went.”
The key is obedience.
What is God calling you to do today and will you be obedient to that call?
Will you get up and go?
Next the passage tells us that Philip met this official from the Ethiopian royal court.
Now this man was obviously a convert to the Jewish faith because the end of verse 27 tells us that, “He had come to worship in Jerusalem.”
So this was a foreigner, an Ethiopian who had converted to Judaism and had come to worship at the Temple Mount and now he’s heading home, but he’s still pouring over the scriptures.
And again the voice of God tells to Philip and says, “Go and join that chariot.”
Now let’s continue reading with verse 30.
Acts 8:30-
Again we see Philip obeying the voice of God without hesitation.
He runs up to the chariot and hears the Ethiopian official reading aloud from the book of Isaiah.
So he asks him, “Do you understand what you’re reading?”
The man says, “How can I, unless someone guides me?”
In many other versions of the Bible this verse is translated “unless someone explains it to me.”
But however you translate it, that’s just what Philip does here.
He picks up with the verses that the Ethiopian was reading and he explains them.
He shows him how Jesus fulfills this prophecy and so many others from the scriptures.
He guides him from one scripture to the next to show him that Jesus is the Messiah and that he came to earth, died on the cross to pay the penalty for our sins, was buried, but then rose again on the third day conquering death for all who place their faith in Him.
And then let’s pick up reading with verse 36.
Here we see that the Ethiopian believes the message that Philip is sharing with him because when they come to a body of water he asks to be baptized right then and there.
Now why is that so significant?
Well first let me set the stage here.
Most of the time when we read this passage, or when we see pictures depicting the scene, we see Peter and a lone Ethiopian man.
And if that’s the case then the baptism is still important as a sign of obedience to God, but let me tell you why I don’t think that’s the case.
First, back in verse 27 when the Ethiopian official is first introduced it says that he is a “high official of Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, who was in charge of her entire treasury.”
Let’s put it in today’s language.
This is the Secretary of the Treasury for Ethiopia who has travelled to another country.
Can you imagine anyone in a cabinet level position in this country travelling outside the country without some type of official escort?
Yeah, it didn’t happen in ancient Ethiopia either.
Luke only mentions the official because he is the head of the delegation, and because he is the focus of the story but there were inevitably other people there.
The second reason I say they were not alone comes in this passage we just read.
In verse 38 it says, “So he ordered the chariot to stop.”
If it were just the two of them, if the official had been driving the chariot before Philip got there, then he would have stopped it, not ordered it to stop.
OK, so what’s the big deal?
Why does it matter that they were not alone when Philip baptized the Ethiopian official?
Well, for those who have been around a while you’ve heard me describe baptism in New Testament times as compared to how we view it today.
For us, in most evangelical churches, we walk down the aisle and make a “public profession of faith” in front of the church members.
Then some time later on we’ll go back in front of the church members to be baptized.
But for the people we’re reading about here in the New Testament, baptism was their “profession of faith.”
And it couldn’t have been any more public because they did it out in lakes and rivers, in the town square, wherever there was enough water.
They didn’t have baptismal pools in their churches, because they didn’t have church buildings.
They met in homes.
When they were baptized they were telling their family, their friends, their neighbors, and anyone else who happened to be around that they were declaring that Jesus is the Messiah they had all been waiting for.
This Ethiopian official was baptized in front of his subordinates.
In front of the chariot driver, and the scribes, and the soldiers that were likely travelling with him.
He was making a public profession of his faith in front of them, and then he would travel on, with all these people knowing something was different.
We don’t have anything else in the Bible specifically telling us what happened to him, but many scholars believe that this eunuch is the person mentioned later in which says,
In his book Against the Heresies, the church father, Irenaeus writes this, “This man (Simeon Bachos the Eunuch) was also sent into the regions of Ethiopia, to preach what he had himself believed, that there was one God preached by the prophets, but that the Son of this (God) had already made (His) appearance in human flesh, and had been led as a sheep to the slaughter; and all the other statements which the prophets made regarding Him."
If this was the same man, then he eventually went home to Ethiopia preaching the gospel there.
As the passage closes they come up out of the water and suddenly Philip just isn’t there anymore.
It says the Spirit of the Lord carried Philip away and he appeared in Azotus which is modern day Ashdod and was something like 30 miles away from where the baptism took place.
The Gaza road was somewhere in the desert, in the interior of the country while Ashdod is along the coast of the Mediterranean.
And it says he then traveled and preached in all the the towns until he came to Caesarea.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9