Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.19UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.15UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.68LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.85LIKELY
Extraversion
0.3UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.85LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Always Yes in Christ
*/2 Corinthians 1:12–2:17/*
 
/Purpose:/  To discover the profoundly positive nature of the gospel and those who communicate it.
Contrary to what some misguided Christian parents think, affirming children does not make them proud and self-centered.
Rather, it meets a fundamental need of the human personality to receive the unqualified affirmation of a significant other.
But often our attempts to affirm each other backfire.
Such was Paul's experience with the Corinthians.
They regarded his change in travel plans and his tough love as a mixed signal, a yes and no.
Paul had already made two visits to Corinth, the first to found the church, and another “painful” visit to deal with a serious discipline problem.
The latter visit, combined with a difficult letter, resulted in an almost complete breakdown in Paul's relationship with the Corinthians.
Paul had promised to visit them again, twice in fact, first as he made his way to Macedonia and then on his way back.
But he changed his plans, delaying his visit and deciding to visit only once.
This led his opponents to claim that he was unreliable or fickle.
In the process of defending his actions, Paul points the Corinthians to the ultimate ground of our affirmation: the eternal “yes” spoken to us by God in Christ.
*1.
*Remember an experience of being recognized by another, possibly a parent or a good friend.
What made that word or action especially up-lifting for you?
 
 
*Question 1.* Encourage people to be /specific/ about some affirmation they have received: what was said, how and by whom.
What feelings and inner responses did they have to being affirmed?
*2.
*Based on 2 Cor 1:12–22, what do you think Paul's opponents were saying about his motives and ministry style?
*2 Cor 1:12  For our boasting is this: the testimony of our conscience that we conducted ourselves in the world in simplicity and godly sincerity, not with fleshly wisdom but by the grace of God, and more abundantly toward you.
13  For we are not writing any other things to you than what you read or understand.
Now I trust you will understand, even to the end  14  (as also you have understood us in part), that we are your boast as you also are ours, in the day of the Lord Jesus.
15  And in this confidence I intended to come to you before, that you might have a second benefit--  16  to pass by way of you to Macedonia, to come again from Macedonia to you, and be helped by you on my way to Judea.
17  Therefore, when I was planning this, did I do it lightly?
Or the things I plan, do I plan according to the flesh, that with me there should be Yes, Yes, and No, No?  18  But as God is faithful, our word to you was not Yes and No.  19  For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us--by me, Silvanus, and Timothy--was not Yes and No, but in Him was Yes.  20  For all the promises of God in Him are Yes, and in Him Amen, to the glory of God through us.
21  Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and has anointed us is God,  22  who also has sealed us and given us the Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee.*
*Question 2.* Almost every positive argument by Paul presumes some negative criticism.
Reading Paul's letters is often like listening to one end of a telephone conversation.
But it is not hard to gather from Paul's arguments what is being said on the other side.
*3.
*What reasons does Paul give for maintaining that his change of itinerary was not a change of mind about the Corinthians (vv.
12, 17)?
 
*2 Cor 1:12  For our boasting is this: the testimony of our conscience that we conducted ourselves in the world in simplicity and godly sincerity, not with fleshly wisdom but by the grace of God, and more abundantly toward you.*
*17  Therefore, when I was planning this, did I do it lightly?
Or the things I plan, do I plan according to the flesh, that with me there should be Yes, Yes, and No, No?*
 
*Matt 5:37  But let your Yes be Yes, and your No, No.
For whatever is more than these is from the evil one.
*
 
 
*Question 3.* “Yes and no” may refer back to the words of Jesus: “Let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No’ ” (Mt 5:37).
The mark of a worldly man (v.
17), whose decisions are made according to self-interest, is his saying “yes” and “no” with the same breath, promising to revisit Corinth but then calculating an expedient way to avoid it.
Eventually Paul reveals that it was to “spare them” that he delayed his visit, although he never failed in his love for them nor reversed his decision to visit them (2:1).
*4.
*Why do you think Paul directs their attention away from his travel plans to the unqualified yes or “amen” of the gospel (vv.
18–20)?
*2 Cor 1:18  But as God is faithful, our word to you was not Yes and No.  19  For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us--by me, Silvanus, and Timothy--was not Yes and No, but in Him was Yes.  20  For all the promises of God in Him are Yes, and in Him Amen, to the glory of God through us.*
*NOTE:*  In Christ all the promises of God find their fulfillment.
*Gal 3:8 And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, In you all the nations shall be blessed.
9  So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham.*
*Question 4.* Ralph Martin comments “that Paul has more to defend than his reputation.
It was bad enough that his enemies attacked him as weak and shifty…It was worse when they went on to insinuate that his message was just as unreliable and unsure.
The purpose of vv.
18–22 is to defend the apostolic ministry which, for Paul, was intimately bound up with the message God had entrusted to him and his co-workers.
Paul is convinced that Christ is the “Amen” (Rev 3:14), which means “let it be so,” the “true” (Rev 3:7).
Therefore /Amen/ is especially fitting in the context of public worship (1 Cor 14:16) and in pastoral relationships such as the one between Paul and the Corinthians.
*5.
*What aspects of Christian experience does Paul point to as evidence of God's “yes” in Christ (vv.
21–22)?
*2 Cor 1:21  Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and has anointed us is God,  22  who also has sealed us and given us the Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee.*
Which part is most meaningful to you now?
 
*1 John 2:20  But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you know all things.*
* *
*1 John 2:20 *(/Amplified/) *But you have been anointed by [you hold a sacred appointment from, you have been given an unction from] the Holy One, and you all know [the Truth] /or you know all things/.*
* *
*NOTE:*  Mature Christians need no teacher.
*1 John 2:27  But the anointing which you have received from Him abides in you, and you do not need that anyone teach you; but as the same anointing teaches you concerning all things, and is true, and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you will abide in Him.*
* *
*1 John 2:27* (/Amplified/)  *But as for you, the anointing (the sacred appointment, the unction) which you received from Him abides [permanently] in you; [so] then you have no need that anyone should instruct you.
But just as His anointing teaches you concerning everything and is true and is no falsehood, so you must abide in (live in, never depart from) Him [being rooted in Him, knit to Him], just as [His anointing] has taught you [to do].*
* *
Immature Christians need a teacher.
*Heb 5:12  For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food.
13  For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe.
14  But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.*
* *
 
*Question 5.* (1) /anointing/ means receiving an important function in Christ through the Spirit (1 John 2:20, 27); (2) /sealing/ means certifying ownership and pledging protection by the owner; (3) /guaranteeing/ means certifying that we will eventually receive our full inheritance in Christ.
These three practical convictions are reason enough to be confident that Paul, and other servants of Christ who live by such a message, can be trusted.
*6.
*What further reason does Paul now give for his change of travel plans (1:23–2:4)?
 
*2 Cor 1:23  Moreover I call God as witness against my soul, that to spare you I came no more to Corinth.
24  Not that we have dominion over your faith, but are fellow workers for your joy; for by faith you stand.
*
 
*2:1  But I determined this within myself, that I would not come again to you in sorrow.
2  For if I make you sorrowful, then who is he who makes me glad but the one who is made sorrowful by me?  3  And I wrote this very thing to you, lest, when I came, I should have sorrow over those from whom I ought to have joy, having confidence in you all that my joy is the joy of you all.
4  For out of much affliction and anguish of heart I wrote to you, with many tears, not that you should be grieved, but that you might know the love which I have so abundantly for you.*
*7.
*In 2:5–11 Paul refers to the discipline of a member of the church, possibly because of a gross sexual sin (see 1 Cor 5:1).
How does Paul's handling of this problem affirm his love not only for the Corinthians but also for the man who had sinned?
*2 Cor 2:5  But if anyone has caused grief, he has not grieved me, but all of you to some extent--not to be too severe.
6  This punishment which was inflicted by the majority is sufficient for such a man,  7  so that, on the contrary, you ought rather to forgive and comfort him, lest perhaps such a one be swallowed up with too much sorrow.
8  Therefore I urge you to reaffirm your love to him.
9  For to this end I also wrote, that I might put you to the test, whether you are obedient in all things.
10  Now whom you forgive anything, I also forgive.
For if indeed I have forgiven anything, I have forgiven that one for your sakes in the presence of Christ,  11  lest Satan should take advantage of us; for we are not ignorant of his devices.
*
 
*1 Cor 5:1  It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and such sexual immorality as is not even named among the Gentiles--that a man has his father's wife! *
 
 
*Question 7.* Many suggest that the offense was some sort of slander perpetrated, whether by word or deed or both, against Paul.
Especially relevant is the contrast of the punishments in view: in 1 Corinthians 5 the offender is to be cut off and left to the destructive powers of Satan, while in 2 Corinthians 2:6–8 the offender is to be forgiven and restored.
A majority of the Corinthian congregation has agreed to some sort of disciplinary action against him, but only after the seriousness and wider meaning of the offense has been brought home by Paul's tearful letter.
Confident now of the church's obedience, he writes again about the matter, this time urging that the offending party be forgiven and brought back into the Christian community.
Whichever interpretation is chosen, the important thing is to observe the depth of Paul's love for the Corinthians.
They wept because he first wept.
Their hearts were touched because his heart had first been touched.
*8.
*Why would Paul's approach to this disciplinary problem likely result in the offender's hearing God's affirmation, his “yes,” in Jesus?
 
 
*Question 8.* Dietrich Bonhoeffer said that church membership without church discipline is cheap grace.
If there is no repentance, no forgiveness will be experienced by the offender.
The easy “yes” of condoning sin is really a “no.”
Therefore, tough love requires confrontation.
What Satanic schemes (v.
11) was Paul aware of?
In this case Satan would have liked nothing better than to have the offender feel so overwhelmed with sorrow that he felt beyond forgiveness.
Therefore, both the apostle's and the community's forgiveness were crucial.
*9.
*Because Paul had no peace of mind in Troas, he couldn't take full advantage of the “door” the Lord had opened for him.
How was he able to speak of his triumph in Christ (v.
14) in the same breath as confessing his weakness?
*2 Cor 2:12  Furthermore, when I came to Troas to preach Christ's gospel, and a door was opened to me by the Lord,  13  I had no rest in my spirit, because I did not find Titus my brother; but taking my leave of them, I departed for Macedonia.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9