Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.61LIKELY
Sadness
0.5UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.73LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.35UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.58LIKELY
Extraversion
0.13UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.42UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.65LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Parable of the Growing Seed
Introduction:
Today we focus on the Gospel of Mark, and also begin to transition to the Gospel of Luke.
Up to this point we have noticed that Matthew is very rich with the Kingdom theme.
But the other Gospels have a lot to say as well.
To begin with our study, I want to mention a few things about the Gospel of Mark, to get a general context about its composition:
Mark, as should be obvious to all, is the shortest of all the gospels.
But although it is the shortest, it is widely considered to be the first and oldest Gospel.
(Before Matthew, Luke and John, Mark was written) Throughout the many studies that have been made of the relationship between the Synoptic gospels, some scholars have noted that Matthew reproduces about 90% of Mark, while Luke reproduces about 50% of Mark.
We should also remember that it is only Matthew that uses the phrase “Kingdom of Heaven.”
Mark and Luke generally will use the phrase “Kingdom of God.”
Ultimately, because we are focusing on the Kingdom theme, and not a direct study on the synoptics, we note these facts about Mark, but will not spend much time on them.
In reality, we will not spend much time in the book of Mark, simply because we have covered a lot of the material in the prior studies.
But today I want us to look at two things unique to Mark about related to the Kingdom theme.
And then we will look at something that is found in all three gospels, that has always raised a lot of questions: The Transfiguration of Jesus.
(Let us pray)
Pretty much all of the Kingdom parables in Mark are found in the book of Matthew.
But there is one parable that is worth noting, because it is not found in Matthew, nor in Luke, but does refer specifically to the Kingdom of God.
This parable is found in , known as the Parable of the Growing Seed
It is possible that this is one of the more obscure parables found in the gospels, most likely because it is tucked away in the Gospel of Mark, and not repeated in the other gospels.
(If 90% of what Mark wrote was reproduced by Matthew, this parable falls under the 10%).
It is truly unique to Mark.
But as obscure as this parable may be, Ellen White actually dedicates an entire chapter to the understanding of this parable, found in Christ Object Lesson, chapter 4.
Although this parable is not found in the other gospels, for the Spirit of Prophecy to dedicate 1 chapter alone to it’s teaching says something about the importance of the parable.
First, to understand this parable, we must begin understanding the context in which it was given.
The parable that begins this chapter is none other than the parable of the sower (or the parable of the different soils).
We find this in
After the disciples ask Jesus about this parable, Jesus gives us the key to understanding that parable: - Key —> The seed represents the word of God.
Three Step process of the Kingdom:
“seed fell on good ground” = “those who hear the word , accept it, and bear fruit”
First the word is “scattered” - That is, the gospel is shared to others.
So the premise behind the Parable of the Growing seed is that the scattering of the seed is in fact the scattering of the word of God (aka the sharing of the gospel, the preaching of the word).
The seed/gospel produces growth in the people that receive it.
Understanding this premise, we also see that the parable is really focused on the three step process of the Kingdom of God:
Lastly, the growth reaches maturity, and when the people are ripe, the harvest comes.
First the word is “scattered” - That is, the gospel is shared to others.
The seed/gospel produces growth in the people that receive it.
Lastly, the growth reaches maturity, and when the people are ripe, the harvest comes.
Lessons from the Parables:
We are called to share the gospel.
We are not called to change people.
First, we have a very specific calling: We are called to share the gospel.
We are not called to change people.
The scatterer does nothing to make the seed grow.
His job is to scatter seed.
God’s job is for it to grow.
Too often we try to change people, but the power of change only lies within God.
Second lesson: Growth in the Kingdom is a process, not a next day thing: The plant grows from blade, to head, full grain.
To expect immediate changes without the pains of growth is to forget how the Kingdom of God works in our life.
Important to remember a child in our spiritual lives, vs someone who has been in the gospel for so long.
We expect them to behave like we do.
Third lesson: The ultimate purpose of the scattering of the seed/sharing the gospel is to be harvested at the end of time.
Ultimately, the growth that God does in us is to prepare us for the harvest, where he can take us back home with him.
The growth and change that the gospel produces is not about glory here on earth, but it is to partake of the glory up in heaven.
Growth in the Kingdom is a process, not a next day thing.
The purpose of sharing the gospel is to be ready for the harvest.
“The object of the Christian life is fruit bearing—the reproduction of Christ’s character in the believer, that it may be reproduced in others.”
Christ’s Object Lessons (p.
67).
“When the character of Christ shall be perfectly reproduced in His people, then He will come to claim them as His own.”
Christ’s Object Lessons (p.
69).
Closeness to the Kingdom
The Same Story found in Matthew
This same story is found in .
But you will notice in Matthew that the conversation ends once Jesus completes his initial response.
Mark presents to us a confirmation of Jesus’ response by the scribe that asked the question.
This is unique to Mark.
And Jesus response to the Scribe’s response is also not found in Matthew, unique to Mark.
Jesus final response to the scribe was: “You are not far from the kingdom of God.”
Why was this scribe “not far” from the Kingdom?
What stopped him from living “in the Kingdom?”
Truth: There is one God, and no other Gods.
We are to love God with everything.
And we are to love our neighbor as one self.
These things are better than burnt offerings and sacrifices.
Who was Joseph of Arimathea?
***Comparison***
Notice that “waiting for the Kingdom of God” is equivalent to being a “a disciple of Jesus.”
“Now when evening had come, there came a rich man from Arimathea, named Joseph, who himself had also become a disciple of Jesus.”
“50 Now behold, there was a man named Joseph, a council member, a good and just man.
51 He had not consented to their decision and deed.
He was from Arimathea, a city of the Jews, who himself was also waiting for the kingdom of God.”
“After this, Joseph of Arimathea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly, for fear of the Jews, asked Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus; and Pilate gave him permission.
So he came and took the body of Jesus.”
The Transfiguration
Notice that “waiting for the Kingdom of God” is equivalent to being a “a disciple of Jesus.”
In other words, to be living in the Kingdom and to be getting ready for the Kingdom, you must be a follower of Jesus, nothing less.
Notice the similarities between the scribe and Joseph of Arimathea.
They were both religious leaders among the Jews.
Most likely they were both council members (members of the Sanhedrin) And they both recognized the wisdom and understanding in the teachings of Jesus.
The one big difference between Joseph and the scribe is that Joseph was a disciple of Jesus, an active follower and believed him to be the Messiah.
The scribe did not.
It is true the scribe believed in one God, and believed in loving God and neighbor.
And he also believed that these three things were more important than any sacrifice one could give (obedience is greater than sacrifice).
He was near the Kingdom of God.
But he needed to take one extra step to be “in” the Kingdom of God: To become a follower of Jesus, a disciple.
What an important lesson for us!
That we may know so much about God and the Bible, but unless we go out and follow Jesus, none of it ultimately matters.
The Transfiguration
The story of the Transfiguration is found in .
What is important in this story is the way the story begins: Jesus begins by telling HIs disciples “Assuredly, I say to you that there are some standing here who will not taste death till they see the kingdom of God present with power.”
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9