Sermon Tone Analysis

Introduction

We are quickly becoming a Biblically illiterate society

Americans both consider the Bible to be a divinely authored book and at the same time see the Bible as a book that fails to measure up to twenty-first century sensibilities.

This issue is crucial for evangelicals.

The authority of the Bible is the first and fundamental domino.

If it falls, so falls the whole chain of beliefs.

43% of people who agreed that God is the author of Scripture also say that modern science discredits the claims of the Bible

Creation is a huge part of this

A 2014 survey by the Barna Group found

30% believe the Bible is the inspired word of God, has no errors but that some verses are meant to be symbolic

23% believe the Bible is the actual word of God and should be taken literally word for word

18% believe that it is just another book

15% believe it is the Inspired word of God but that it contains factual and historical errors

10% not inspired at all

Clearly there is an issue with the authority of the Bible not only in society at large, but more troublesome is that it is in the church

Thankfully this is not new - although we are going to find that this new challenge is a little different

Scripture Alone in the 1500’s

It is important to note that Martin Luther did not set out initially to split the church but to reform it from within

After he nailed the 95 theses to the door of the church in Wittenburg his teachings came under attack from the Roman Catholic Church

In 1519 he traveled to Leipzig to debate with Johann Eck - a prominent Catholic apologist

It was during this debate that the ideal of Scriptural authority and the authority of the church came in to direct conflict

Eck accused Luther of espousing the teachings of John Hus

Luther tried to refuse this moniker because Hus had been condemned as a heretic 100 years prior

Luther reviewed what Hus had actually taught and realized that he was more like Hus and that Eck was correct

Eck challenged Luther as to whether he was the only person who had any knowledge

“I answer that God once spoke through the mouth of an ass.

I will tell you straight what I think.

I am a Christian theologian, and I am bound, not only to assert, but to defend the truth with my blood and death.

I believe freely and will be a slave to the authority of no one, whether council, university or pope”

Luther was forced to choose - he chose Scripture

What Sola Scriptura was (and is) not

It doesn’t mean that other things cannot inform our theology - past theologians, commentaries, etc have value

What it does mean is that when we have to choose Scripture alone is our ultimate authority

What the Catholic Church teaches

The Catechism of the Catholic Church published in 1992 says:

As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone.

Both Scripture and tradition must be accepted and honored with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence

The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the magisterium of the Church, that is to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.

Today - the same view is espoused by the Jehovah’s Witnesses

“The Bible is an organizational book and belongs to the Christian congregation as an organization, not to individuals, regardless of how sincerely they may believe that they can interpret the Bible…the Bible cannot be properly understood without Jehovah’s visible organization in mind”

Interestingly enough this is the same view espoused by the Pharisees

It was not enough just to keep the laws given through Moses - they made it necessary to keep the “oral” traditions as well

The Pharisees were invalidating the Word of God by their traditions

A challenge to the authority of the Word of God

Calvin said this

“The difference between us and the papists (Catholics) is that they believe that the church cannot be the pillar of the truth unless she presides over the Word of God.

We, on the other hand, assert that it is because she reverently subjects herself to the Word of God that the truth is preserved by her, and passed on to others by her hands.”

There was a confusion of the source of authority

Scripture is not like a treaty signed as an agreement between God and men

The Constitution of the United States has authority because the government ratified it and accepted it and then subjects itself to what it says

Scripture because it was written by God carries with it the authority of the author

This was taken even further to apply to the preaching of God’s Word

It is not the office of a pastor that gives him his authority.

His authority comes from God’s Word.

The Second Helvetic Confession says this of the preaching of the Word of God

Wherefore when the Word of God is now preached in the church by preachers lawfully called, we believe that the very Word of God is proclaimed and received by the faithful; and that neither any other Word of God is to be invented nor is to be expected from heaven: and that now the Word itself which is preached is to be regarded, not the minister that preaches; for even if he be evil and a sinner, nevertheless the Word of God remains still true and good.

Ulrich Zwingli said it this way “If he teaches you in accordance with the Word of God, it is not he that teaches you, but God who teaches him.”

There is also a warning - “If he teaches you in accordance with his own thoughts and mind his teaching is false.”

For the reformers the preaching of God’s Word was to hear the voice of God

“Would to God that we would gradually train our hearts to believe that the preachers words are God’s Word” ~ Martin Luther

To be careful - this raises our view of preaching not of preachers...

What does the Bible say about itself?

2 Timothy 3:16; Romans 10:14; Psalm 119:105; Hebrews 1:1-2

Scripture Alone today

As we have seen the major challenge to the authority of Scripture during the Reformation was tradition

That is not so today

Today it is experience - that we don’t need to read or subject ourselves to what Scripture says but simply follow our feelings, our expriences

Rob Bell in his recent book “What is the Bible” says this:

"The problem, of course, is that the folks who talk the most about the authority of the Bible also seem to talk the most about things like objective and absolute truth, truth that exists independent of relational realities."

So there is no absolute truth - the Bible is subject to your own individual interpretation of what it means

Bill Johnson from Bethel Church in Redding California says:

“Those who feel safe because of their intellectual grasp of Scriptures enjoy a false sense of security.

None of us has a full grasp of Scripture, but we all have the Holy Spirit.

He is our common denominator who will always lead us into truth.

But to follow Him, we must be willing to follow off the map - to go beyond what we know.”

There’s just enough truth in that statement to make it dangerous and seriously undermine the authority of Scripture.

We don’t have a FULL grasp of Scripture

We do all have the Holy Spirit

But that doesn’t mean we abandon the book and go off on our own to try and find the way

We need to continue to be a bastion of Scriptural authority and inerrancy - Scripture alone - in our church and personal lives

When challenges to our faith come we shouldn’t respond from church tradition, the latest social study or our own ideas but rather we should proudly proclaim “This is what the Bible says”....

Conclusion

The Bible is not just true; it is truer than anything else