Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.63LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.72LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.26UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.99LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.74LIKELY
Extraversion
0.22UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.5LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.7LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Inspiration of Scripture
THE UNIQUENESS OF THE BIBLE
The Bible is unique!
It is not enough to say that it is a unique Book, for it is a collection of sixty-six ancient Books.
Moreover, this unique collection of Books is bound together by a central theme and a unity of purpose which makes the books into One Book.
The One Book tells of the ways in which God revealed Himself to mankind over a period of several thousand years.
This account of the ways in which God has intervened in human history provides us with a description of the nature and the attributes of God completely different from the concept of God found anywhere else in the entire world of literature.
The Bible is history, but history strikingly different from ordinary history.
Secular history tells of the rise and fall of nations, of great wars and battles, and of the ways in which men and nations have affected the peoples of surrounding territories.
But the Bible goes further than that.
The Bible is an interpretation of history, showing how men (as individuals and as nations) have either been blessed or punished by God for their attitude to Him and His holy laws.
It is this unique explanation of the moral and spiritual factors behind the historical narrative, which makes the Bible so relevant to us today.
The Bible enables us to discover the will of God for our lives—because this divine will is made plain in hundreds of real-life illustrations in the Bible.
You and I have a responsibility to examine the scripture, exegete the text, but we are also to allow the scripture to examine us; let the text exegete us.
First, we must answer some of the questions many people have in their minds as they begin to read the Bible.
Some say, for example, “Why should I read a book which is merely Jewish mythology?”
Jewish mythology is quite different from what we find in the Bible.
In fact the truth of the Bible will be quite evident to us as we continue our study.
Others ask, “How could such an ancient Book still be relevant?”
True, people today are much better educated than ever before; yet the Bible (in part or the whole) ranks as the “world’s best-seller.”
Every year more than one hundred million copies are sold!
So, when you read the Bible you are in good company, for millions of modern people are reading it!
Moreover, it is not being read only by people in Western lands!
The Bible (either in part or the whole) is being read today in more than twelve hundred languages.
The Bible is being sold today in the languages of 97% of the world’s population and is being read in almost every country and island on earth.
For this reason alone, no person is really educated if he has not studied the most widely read Book in the literature of the world.
The Old Testament begins with a concise account of the creation of the world.
This unique narrative begins in the undated past, and records how God the Almighty Creator prepared the world, stage-by-stage, to be a home for mankind.
When all was ready, God created man.
From this logical beginning, the story continues for thousands of years until we reach the end of the Old Testament in the days of Malachi about 400 B.C.
The New Testament covers a relatively short period from the birth of Jesus to the death of the Apostles.
It was completed about 100 A.D.
INSPIRATION OF SCRIPTURE “All Scripture is inspired by God” (2 Tim.
3:16 HCSB).
B. B. Warfield argued that the compound word (theopneustos), translated “inspired by God,” misleadingly borrows from the Vulgate (Lat., divinitus inspirata).
Instead of an inspiration (i.e., a breathing into by God), Paul’s Greek suggests that Scripture is a divine “spiration” (that which God has breathed out, the product of His creative breath).
Paul’s point, then, is not that Scripture is inspiring to read (it is that), or that the authors were inspired (they were), but that Scripture’s origin means it is the very Word of God.
Moreover, the verse is sometimes incorrectly translated as “every Scripture which is inspired,” perhaps implying that Paul did not believe all Scripture is inspired.
But in the preceding verse, he alludes not to just a portion but to the entire OT as the “sacred Scriptures.”
For Paul and the writers of the Bible, the Scriptures are “the spoken words of God” (Rom.
3:2 HCSB).
When Scripture speaks, God speaks (1 Cor.
6:16; Heb.
3:7; 10:15).
Theories of Inspiration Historically, biblical inspiration has been reckoned in four ways.
(1) The Bible is only inspired like other good books with human authors.
This is neither what Scripture says nor what the church has believed.
(2) The Bible is only partially inspired by God.
Proponents hold that only the theological (not the scientific or historical) portions of Scripture are inspired, or that Scripture is just a record of God’s saving historical acts, or that the Bible contains the word of God rather than being that word.
But inspiration ensures that Scripture itself is the revealed word of God, not only testifying of God’s redemptive work but also interpreting it.
(3) The Bible is divinely inspired without use of human authors.
Mechanical dictation theory renders Scripture analogous to myths regarding the origins of the Koran or Book of Mormon, and runs contrary to what the Bible says of its origins.
(4) The Bible is divinely inspired because God concurrently worked with human authors to produce the very written message He desired.
This classical view teaches the Holy Spirit superintended more than 40 authors from widely divergent backgrounds (shepherds, kings, prophets, fishermen, etc.), spanning a period of approximately a millennium and a half, to produce with supernatural congruity not just the thoughts but the very words of God to mankind.
Mode of Inspiration The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978) confesses that the “mode of divine inspiration remains largely a mystery to us.”
But certain inferences can be drawn.
For instance, the authors were divinely prepared to write God’s word in much the same way as the prophets were made ready to speak His word.
“Now the word of the LORD came to me saying, ‘Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you … all that I command you, you shall speak.…
Behold, I have put My words in your mouth” (Jer.
1:4–9 NASB; cp.
Exod.
4:11–16; 1 Sam.
3; Isa.
6:1–9; Ezek.
2:3–3:11; Amos 7:14–15; Gal.
1:15; Rev. 1:10–11, 19).
New Testament apostles were received as authoritative by the early church in the same way as OT prophets under inspiration (1 Cor.
2:9–13; 14:37; Col. 4:16; 1 Thess.
2:13; 5:27; 2 Thess.
3:6; 2 Pet.
3:2).
Peter referred to the writings of Paul as Scripture (2 Pet.
3:15–16; inferred also in Jude 17–18).
God Himself wrote the Decalogue (Exod.
24:12; 31:18; 32:16), and the writers of Scripture occasionally wrote what God dictated (Exod.
34:27–28; Rev. 1:10–11).
But normally God used His chosen writers’ personalities, theological meditations, and literary styles.
Inspiration was not always continuous in the writers’ minds (Jer.
1:2; 14:1; 25:1; 26:1).
The divine inscripturated message often surpassed the author’s understanding (Dan.
12:8–9; Luke 10:23–24; 1 Pet.
1:10–12).
Biblical authors were not always aware that divine inspiration was at work in them (Luke 1:3, Luke’s historical research).
The apostles could write divinely inspired letters in responding to questions and by stating their opinions (1 Cor.
7:1, 25).
The Holy Spirit saw to it that each biblical book actually has two authors, one human and one divine.
Thus the divine superintendence of Scripture guarantees its inerrancy.
Inerrancy P. D. Feinberg defined inerrancy as “the view that when all the facts become known, they will demonstrate that the Bible in its original manuscripts and correctly interpreted is entirely true and never false in all it affirms, whether that relates to doctrine or ethics or to the social, physical, or life sciences” (Evangelical Dictionary of Theology).
Inerrancy extends only to the original biblical writings, the autographa (Chicago Statement: “Copies and translations of Scripture are the Word of God to the extent that they faithfully represent the original”).
Though this stress by conservatives upon the autographa is often ridiculed, the emphasis is critical and sensible.
Compared to a later copyist or translator, the author of the original text had a supernatural task for which the total superintendence of the Holy Spirit was needed.
Only once for all time the text was written.
Should the autograph be corrupted by errors, the following copies and translations of it would never be able to arrive at God’s revealed truth.
Therefore, the evangelical who emphasizes the inerrancy of the original manuscript does not undermine copies or translations, rather the undermining is done by those who deny the inerrancy of the autographa.
The obvious order of transmission is from the original to copy to translation.
Biblical faith, then, must not admit of error in the autographa but must be diligently aware of the possibility for error in copy or translation.
This awareness has led to careful study of the textual transmission process and the original languages.
Thankfully, divine providence has overseen the transmission of scriptural copies for 3,000 years.
The remarkable conserving work of the OT accomplished by Masoretic scribes is well documented, and NT copies abound more than any other work of antiquity, lending great confidence that we have what the apostles wrote.
(It is simply not true that use of modern critical texts as opposed to the Textus Receptus will obscure or corrupt biblical doctrine.
The widespread consensus among conservative textual scholars is that variants in the copies are insignificant regarding doctrine.)
English readers are especially well served by an abundance of translations that faithfully make available the Word of God in the vernacular.
Inerrancy is a matter of faith and is not demonstrable by scholarship.
But many attacks upon the veracity of Scripture are wrongheaded from the outset by those who insist upon arbitrary criteria for inerrancy.
As the Chicago Statement notes, inerrancy is not undermined “by Biblical phenomena such as a lack of modern technical precision, irregularities of grammar or spelling, observational descriptions of nature, the reporting of falsehoods, the use of hyperbole and round numbers, the topical arrangement of material, variant selections of material in parallel accounts, or the use of free citations.”
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9