Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0UNLIKELY
Disgust
0UNLIKELY
Fear
0UNLIKELY
Joy
0.07UNLIKELY
Sadness
0UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.9LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.42UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.63LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.18UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.13UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.41UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.12UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Definitions—nothing worse than something defined as something that it really isn’t.
Customer Service
Warranty
Deceivers in Jude
A Epistolary Introduction: Participants and Threefold Characterization of Receptors (1)
B Salutation—Threefold Benediction (2)
C Purpose Introduced—Appeal (3)
D Motivation, First Mention—False Teachers (4)
E Reminder—Warning from Old Testament Times (5–7)
F Description—Heretics: 3 Attributes (8)
G Extracanonical example (Ancient)—Michael (9)
H Description—Heretics: 3 Attributes (10)
I Woe Oracle: 3 Archetypes from Old Testament (11)
H’Description—Heretics: 6 Attributes (12–13)
Extracanonical Prediction (Ancient)—Enoch (14–15)
Description—Heretics: 3 Attributes (16)
Reminder—Warning from New Testament Times (17–18)
Motivation, Final Mention—False Teachers (19)
Purpose Elaborated—Appeal (20–21)
Commission—A Threefold Assignment (22–23)
Epistolary Conclusion (24–25)
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9