Untitled Sermon (7)
14 But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.
3:29–30. The next two questions cover the same issue of Jewish distinctiveness from a different angle. Because the Gentiles worshiped false gods through idols, the Jews concluded that Yahweh, the true and living God (Jer. 10:10), was the God of Jews only. That was true in the sense that the Jews were the only people who acknowledged and worshiped Yahweh (except for a few proselyte Gentiles who joined with Judaism). But in reality Yahweh, as the Creator and Sovereign of all people, is the God of all people. Before God called Abraham and his descendants in the nation Israel to be His Chosen People (Deut. 7:6) God dealt equally with all people. And even after God’s choice of Israel to be His special people, God made it plain (e.g., in the Book of Jonah) that He is the God of everyone, Gentiles as well as Jews. And now since there is “no difference” among people for all are sinners (Rom. 3:23) and since the basis for salvation has been provided in the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ, God deals with everyone on the same basis. Thus there is only one God (or “God is one”). Paul no doubt had in mind here the “Shema” of Israel: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD [Yahweh] our God [‘lōhîm], the LORD [Yahweh] is One” (Deut. 6:4). This one God over both Jews and Gentiles will justify all who come to Him regardless of background (circumcised or uncircumcised) on the same human condition of faith.
3:29–30. The next two questions cover the same issue of Jewish distinctiveness from a different angle. Because the Gentiles worshiped false gods through idols, the Jews concluded that Yahweh, the true and living God (Jer. 10:10), was the God of Jews only. That was true in the sense that the Jews were the only people who acknowledged and worshiped Yahweh (except for a few proselyte Gentiles who joined with Judaism). But in reality Yahweh, as the Creator and Sovereign of all people, is the God of all people. Before God called Abraham and his descendants in the nation Israel to be His Chosen People (Deut. 7:6) God dealt equally with all people. And even after God’s choice of Israel to be His special people, God made it plain (e.g., in the Book of Jonah) that He is the God of everyone, Gentiles as well as Jews. And now since there is “no difference” among people for all are sinners (Rom. 3:23) and since the basis for salvation has been provided in the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ, God deals with everyone on the same basis. Thus there is only one God (or “God is one”). Paul no doubt had in mind here the “Shema” of Israel: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD [Yahweh] our God [‘lōhîm], the LORD [Yahweh] is One” (Deut. 6:4). This one God over both Jews and Gentiles will justify all who come to Him regardless of background (circumcised or uncircumcised) on the same human condition of faith.
The purpose of the Mosaic Law is fulfilled and its place in God’s total plan is confirmed when it leads an individual to faith in Jesus Christ (cf. v. 20; Gal. 3:23–25).
27. In this and the following verses the apostle presents the tendency and results of the glorious plan of salvation, which he had just unfolded. It excludes boasting (verse 27); it presents God in his true character, as the God and Father of the Gentiles as well as of the Jews (verses 29–30); and it establishes the law (verse 31).
Paul moves quickly through several implications of and arguments for justification by faith.
The word boasting is used to express the idea of self-congratulation with or without sufficient reason.
Paul means to say that the result of the Gospel plan of salvation is to prevent all self-approbation and self-congratulation and exaltation on the part of the sinner. He
Paul means to say that the result of the Gospel plan of salvation is to prevent all self-approbation and self-congratulation and exaltation on the part of the sinner.
Since sin is odious in God’s sight, it is essential in any merciful plan that the sinner should be made to feel this and know that nothing done by him or for him can in any way diminish his sense of personal unworthiness caused by his transgressions. Obviously this result could not follow from any plan of justification that placed the basis of the sinner’s acceptance in himself or in any special advantages derived from his birth or ecclesiastical links. But his salvation is guaranteed by that plan of justification which places the basis of his acceptance completely outside himself and also requires, as the very condition of that acceptance, an act involving a penitent acknowledgment of personal unworthiness and exclusive dependence on the merit of someone else.
Since sin is odious in God’s sight, it is essential in any merciful plan that the sinner should be made to feel this and know that nothing done by him or for him can in any way diminish his sense of personal unworthiness caused by his transgressions. Obviously this result could not follow from any plan of justification that placed the basis of the sinner’s acceptance in himself or in any special advantages derived from his birth or ecclesiastical links. But his salvation is guaranteed by that plan of justification which places the basis of his acceptance completely outside himself and also requires, as the very condition of that acceptance, an act involving a penitent acknowledgment of personal unworthiness and exclusive dependence on the merit of someone else.
Paul deals with both classes on precisely the same principles. He offers salvation to both on exactly the same terms. Therefore in this teaching the foundation is laid for a universal religion which may be preached to every creature under heaven, which need not, as was the case with the Jewish system, be confined to any one sect or nation. This is the only teaching which suits the character of God and his relation to all his intelligent creatures on earth. God is a universal and not a national God; and this is a method of salvation which is universally applicable. These sublime truths are so familiar to our minds that to some extent they have lost their power. But for the Jew imprisoned all his life in these narrow national and religious prejudices, these truths must have filled his whole soul with wonder, gratitude, and joy. We Gentiles may now look up to heaven and confidently say, “You are our Father, though Abraham does not know us, and though Israel does not acknowledge us.”
Certainly, the centrality of the law in the Jewish religion rendered Jews very susceptible to such a tendency; but all people, being fallen, exhibit the same tendency: Greeks, boasting in their wisdom (cf. 1 Cor. 1:19–31); Americans, boasting in their “American way of life”; and all too many Christians, boasting in their “good deeds” instead of in the grace of God.
the faith that gains a standing with God is explicitly distanced from the Mosaic law (“apart from the law”; “apart from works of the law”).
A second interpretation is, then, to be preferred: that Paul is contrasting two different “laws.” On this view, the word nomos, in both its actual occurrences in the verse, has a metaphorical sense: “principle,” or “rule.”
Rather than being entirely metaphorical, then, Paul’s use of nomos embodies a “play on words,” in which the characteristic demand of the Mosaic covenant—works—is contrasted with the basic demand of the New Covenant (and of the OT, broadly understood; cf. chap. 4)—faith.
A serious erosion of the full significance of Paul’s gospel occurs if we soften this antithesis; no works, whatever their nature or their motivation, can play any part in making a sinner right with God.
29–3
A serious erosion of the full significance of Paul’s gospel occurs if we soften this antithesis; no works, whatever their nature or their motivation, can play any part in making a sinner right with God.
For, in Judaism, God was the God of Gentiles only by virtue of his creative work, while only the Jews enjoy any meaningful relationship with God; this is expressed in later Jewish text: “I am God over all that came into the world, but I have joined my name only with you [Israel]; I am not called the God of the idolaters, but the God of Israel.” Only by accepting the torah could Gentiles hope to become related to God in the same way as Jews
A second objection is more serious. That Paul sees in the OT a witness to his teaching about justification by faith is clear. But when denoting that function of the OT, he uses “the law and the prophets” (v. 21) or the “Scripture” (Gal. 3:8). Nowhere does he use “law” by itself to indicate this witnessing role of the OT. Even in Rom. 4, “law” is used in a negative sense and is not linked with the “witness” of Gen. 15:6. Perhaps most significant is 4:3, which introduces the quotation of this verse by asking, not “What does the ‘law’ say?” but “What does the Scripture say?” These points do not make it impossible that Paul refers here to the testifying role of the law—but they make it unlikely.
If people are set right with God through faith, what room is there for boasting? In this context “boasting” should be taken not in the sense of unwarranted self-adulation for meritorious achievement but as justifiable pride on the part of the Jewish nation for having been chosen by God for a special role in the drama of redemption (Rom 3:2; 9:4–5).