Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.55LIKELY
Joy
0.17UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.14UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.57LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.15UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.64LIKELY
Extraversion
0.15UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.27UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.65LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction:
Illustration -
a
In the days of the pioneers, when men saw that a prairie fire was coming, what would they do?
Since not even the fastest of horses could outrun it, the pioneers took a match and burned the grass in a designated area around them.
Then they would take their stand in the burned area and be safe from the threatening prairie fire.
As the roar of the flames approached, they would not be afraid.
Even as the ocean of fire surged around them there was no fear, because fire had already passed over the place where they stood.
[Michael P. Green, 1500 Illustrations for Biblical Preaching (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2000), 207.]
When the judgment of God comes to sweep men and women into hell for eternity, there is one spot that is safe.
[Michael P. Green, 1500 Illustrations for Biblical Preaching (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2000), 207.]
Main Thought: Thoughts of God’s wrath on sinners should be disturbing to your “comfort zone.”
Sub-intro:
Note - I here defer to Dr. Thomas Strouse’s eloquent summary of the immediate context for review:
a
Chapters four and five focused on the Throne Room in heaven, and allowed for a transition between the local church age on earth, and the Tribulation on earth known as “Jacob’s trouble” (cf.
).
With chapter six, and going to nineteen, Daniel’s seventieth week (a unit of seven years) begins, as God uses Seal, Trumpet, and Vial Judgments to deal with both Israel and the nations (cf. ) concerning “the things which shall be hereafter” ().
According to the OT prophet Daniel, the Roman prince (i.e., Antichrist) “shall confirm the covenant with many for one week, and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease…” (vv.
26-27).
The Lord Jesus Christ expounded on the Tribulation period in response to His disciples’ queries, giving details of the sequence of events of this “one week” (cf.
; vide also ; and ).
In , Christ listed characteristics of the first half of the Tribulation, and in verses 15-28 he listed descriptions of the second half.
He built His eschatology upon Daniel’s prophecy concerning the mid-point of the Tribulation and “the abomination of desolation” (v.
15; cf.
).878
To the Saviour, recognizing the mid-point of the Tribulation was the pivotal hermeneutical principle for those in the Tribulation to understand the “when” and “what” of the Lord’s coming (cf.
).
With Daniel’s prophecy as a foundation, the Lord Jesus Christ gave His complementary explanation of events of the Tribulation (.) which John received ().
For instance, both passages give in the same order the following: war (; ), famine (; ), death (; ), martyrdom (; ), cosmic activity (; ), and judgment (; ; ).
Further, Christ divided the Tribulation period into the two halves to which Daniel (cf. ; ) and John ( et al) alluded, 1) “the beginning of sorrows” (), the intervening mid-point with “the abomination of desolation” (), and 2) the “great tribulation” ().
The Lord’s Olivet Discourse () harmonized with the [Apocalypse] that the Apostle John received from the Saviour (.).
873 Luther called it der Angst in Jakob and the Vulgate rendered the Hebrew as tribulationis est Iacob.
874 Cf.
Strouse, But Daniel Purposed in His Heart: An Exegetical Commentary on Daniel, pp.
137-143.
875 The Saviour constantly employed the temporal adverb to,te (“then,” vv. 9, 10, 14, 16, 21, 23, 30 [2], and 40), the temporal conjunction o[tan (“when,” vv.
15, 32, 33), and the temporal adverb euvqe,wj (“immediately,” v. 29) to emphasize the chronological development of events.
876 The Lord did not believe Daniel’s prophecy was fulfilled in Antiochus Epiphanes (175-164 BC).
877 The Greek to.
bde,lugma th/j evrhmw,sewj also occurs in .
Christ borrowed the term “abomination[s]” from ; ; .
878 Apparently, the Saviour knew that during the Tribulation “many shall run to and fro” attempting to find a copy of the Book of Daniel, and that “knowledge [eschatological] shall be increased” ().
879 Scripture employed various ways to express either half of the Tribulation.
For instance, the expression “forty and two months” (; ) is the same as “a thousand two hundred and threescore days” (; ), or “a time and times and the dividing of time” (), or “a time, times, and an half” (), or “a time, and times, and half a time” ().
Apparently, the Tribulation calendar will be based on the thirty day month, albeit Antichrist will attempt to change the times (cf.
), perhaps based on a sexagesimal six-day week (cf.
; ).
880 The Tribulation is “as a woman that travaileth” (), and Matthew’s Greek expression wvdi,nwn is the equivalent to Isaiah’s Hebrew !Wl+yxiy> hd"ÞleAYK.
Since the warning of wars, famines, pestilences, and earthquakes () is included in the first half of the Tribulation, these are not “signs” for church age saints prior to the Rapture!
[Thomas M. Strouse, To the Seven Churches: A Commentary on the Apocalypse of Jesus Christ, Selected Works of Dr. Thomas M. Strouse (Bible Baptist Theological Press, 40 Country Squire Rd., Cromwell, CT 06461, 2013), 255–257.]
Body:
I. THE FALSE MESSIAH ().
a
The Lamb, the one worthy to open the seals, has taken the scroll.
As the seals are opened, they progressively expose and inaugurate God’s final plan to rid the world of evil.
Yet these are preliminary judgments, as the scroll will not be fully open until all seven seals have been released.
When the Lamb opens each of the first four seals, one of the four living beings from 4:6–8 calls forth the famous “four horsemen,” showing that every part of these events comes by order from the throne of God.
The theme of this section is the absolute depravity of humankind.
Each of the horsemen demonstrates the descent of humankind deeper and deeper into sin, and together they show the self-destructive nature of sin.
Yet three times in this section God gives authority to the riders (6:2, 4, 8), showing God’s absolute power over the entire process.
Even the forces of evil act only by divine permission.
[Grant R. Osborne, Revelation: Verse by Verse, Osborne New Testament Commentaries (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016), 122–123.]
A. Heaven's Messiah ()
1.
The Crucified (1a)
See above verses in chs.
4-5 concerning the “Lamb, standing, as it had been slain...”
2. The Conqueror (1b)
See also above chs.
4-5 concerning John’s weeping and the Lamb’s prevailing to open the book...
3. The Call (1c)
Note - “and see” rightly belongs in the text.
Barnes Notes does justice to what John may have “seen”:
a
And I saw, and behold.
A question has arisen as to the mode of representation here: whether what John saw in these visions was a series of pictures, drawn on successive portions of the volume as one seal was broken after another; or whether the description of the horses and of the events was written on the volume, so that John read it himself, or heard it read by another; or whether the opening of the seal was merely the occasion of a scenic representation, in which a succession of horses was introduced, with a written statement of the events which are referred to.
Nothing is indeed said by which this can be determined with certainty; but the most probable supposition would seem to be that there was some pictorial representation in form and appearance, such as he describes in the opening of the six seals.
In favour of this it may be observed, (1) that, according to the interpretation of ver. 1, it was something in or on the volume—since he was invited to draw nearer, in order that he might contemplate it.
(2) Each one of the things under the first five seals, where John uses the word “saw,” is capable of being represented by a picture or painting.
(3) The language used is not such as would have been employed if he had merely read the description, or had heard it read.
(4) The supposition that the pictorial representation was not in the volume, but that the opening of the seal was the occasion merely of causing a scenic representation to pass before his mind, is unnatural and forced.
What would be the use of a sealed volume in that case?
What the use of the writing within and without?
On this supposition the representation would be that, as the successive seals were broken, nothing was disclosed in the volume but a succession of blank portions, and that the mystery or the difficulty was not in anything in the volume, but in the want of ability to summon forth these successive scenic representations.
The most obvious interpretation is, undoubtedly, that what John proceeds to describe was in some way represented in the volume; and p 138 the idea of a succession of pictures or drawings better accords with the whole representation, than the idea that it was a mere written description.
In fact, these successive scenes could be well represented now in a pictorial form on a scroll.
[Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: Revelation, ed.
Robert Frew (London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 137–138.]
Note - How one interpret’s the identity of this first rider matters greatly:
...one’s viewpoint of the first horseman seems to be determinative for identifying whether the basic agency of all four is divine or satanic.
Respective advocates of each view cite an impressive array of Scriptural evidence and logic; ironically, those holding opposing viewpoints often use the same O.T. and N.T. Scriptures for support and seek to bolster their argument with parallels from antiquity.
[Gwyn Pugh, “Commentary on the Book of Revelation,” in 1, 2, 3 John & Revelation, ed.
Robert E. Picirilli, First Edition., The Randall House Bible Commentary (Nashville, TN: Randall House, 2010), 229.]
one’s viewpoint of the first horseman seems to be determinative for identifying whether the basic agency of all four is divine or satanic.
Respective advocates of each view cite an impressive array of Scriptural evidence and logic; ironically, those holding opposing viewpoints often use the same O.T. and N.T. Scriptures for support and seek to bolster their argument with parallels from antiquity.
[Gwyn Pugh, “Commentary on the Book of Revelation,” in 1, 2, 3 John & Revelation, ed.
Robert E. Picirilli, First Edition., The Randall House Bible Commentary (Nashville, TN: Randall House, 2010), 229.]
Gwyn Pugh, “Commentary on the Book of Revelation,” in 1, 2, 3 John & Revelation, ed.
Robert E. Picirilli, First Edition., The Randall House Bible Commentary (Nashville, TN: Randall House, 2010), 229.]
Note - I tend to agree with Grant Osborne regarding whether or not these judgments are sequential (as Strouse) or parallel:
...there is debate among interpreters about the relationship between the seals, trumpets, and bowls.
Many believe that these three sets of judgments should be understood as successive, with the seventh of each set encompassing the next set, which flows out of it.
In this case, there would be 21 successive events during the last phase of human history, called “the great tribulation” after 7:14 (“come out of the great tribulation”).
One drawback to this approach is that it does not explain the exact repetition in the order of the first four trumpets and first four bowls, which parallel each other in progressing from earthly to oceanic to fresh water to heavenly body judgments (8:6–12 = 16:2–9).
It also does not explain the fact that the seals, trumpets, and bowls all seem to end at the eschaton.
It is more likely that these are not successive events but three parallel cycles that recapitulate one another.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9